Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives

Sep.09
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has named Bret Koplow permanent director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, ending his period as acting chief. Koplow has spent years working on tobacco regulation, law and policy inside the FDA and, while serving as acting director, pushed for faster PMTA reviews and nicotine pouch review pilots. HHS also said CTP will prioritize innovation and access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers while continuing efforts to protect youth.

Key Points

  • HHS formally appointed Bret Koplow as director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products after his acting tenure.
  • Koplow has worked at the FDA since 2011, with a long record in tobacco regulation, law and policy.
  • During his acting tenure, CTP said it reduced the PMTA backlog by about 70% in 2025 and accelerated review processes.
  • HHS said CTP will prioritize innovation and access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers alongside youth protection.

2Firsts

September 9, 2026

According to an announcement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on September 8, 2026, Bret Koplow has been formally appointed director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products.

Koplow had already been serving as acting director. The appointment ends the center’s acting-leadership period and places the agency’s tobacco and nicotine regulatory arm under a permanent director.

Longstanding FDA Tobacco Policy Background

Koplow has worked at the FDA since 2011.

Before joining CTP leadership, he served from 2020 as a senior adviser to the FDA commissioner, focusing heavily on tobacco regulation, policy and operations.

Earlier roles included positions in the FDA Office of Chief Counsel and the Office of Legislation.

Koplow has both legal and clinical psychology training, giving him a background centered on regulatory law, policy implementation and agency operations rather than a purely scientific or public-health track.

Acting Tenure Focused on Faster PMTA Reviews

During his time as acting CTP director, Koplow made product-review efficiency a visible priority.

In a May 2026 statement, he said CTP had reduced the PMTA backlog by roughly 70% during 2025 and had eliminated queues at the acceptance stage.

The center also said it was working to improve filing and scientific-review efficiency and develop faster review pathways for certain supplemental PMTAs.

Nicotine pouches were another major focus.

CTP launched a nicotine pouch PMTA pilot and said the first decisions were completed within three months of scientific review beginning. The center said lessons from that pilot would be applied more broadly to nicotine pouch applications.

2Firsts previously reported that Koplow’s May statement placed increased emphasis on innovation and review efficiency, signaling a stronger focus on accelerating regulatory decision-making for tobacco and nicotine products.

HHS Highlights Innovation and Lower-Risk Alternatives

HHS also used the appointment announcement to define CTP’s priorities under Koplow’s permanent leadership.

The department said Koplow will lead efforts to advance innovation and increase access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers while taking decisive action to protect American youth from tobacco and nicotine harms.

The wording places adult access to alternative products alongside youth protection as part of CTP’s formal priorities.

For vaping, nicotine pouch and heated tobacco companies, the statement indicates that product innovation and regulatory market access will remain central parts of the agency’s agenda.

Recent Authorizations Reflect Review Direction

During Koplow’s acting tenure, the FDA continued issuing decisions across several newer nicotine categories.

The agency advanced nicotine pouch reviews and authorized additional ZYN products and other pouches.

On August 28, the FDA also authorized the JUUL2 device and two 1.6% pods for marketing in the United States.

Those decisions are consistent with the center’s stated emphasis on improving review efficiency.

At the same time, the FDA has continued enforcement against unauthorized products, products with strong youth appeal and companies that violate marketing or sales requirements.

Koplow’s formal appointment therefore does not signal deregulation. It is more likely to continue the dual approach already visible under his acting leadership: faster review of compliant products combined with continued enforcement against unauthorized and youth-focused products.

CTP Enters a Permanent Leadership Phase

CTP oversees U.S. market authorization, product standards, marketing rules and enforcement for tobacco and nicotine products, making it one of the world’s most influential tobacco regulators.

Koplow’s move from acting to permanent director gives the center greater leadership continuity as it manages a large and evolving regulatory workload.

For industry, that stability also matters commercially.

PMTA, MRTP and other tobacco product regulatory pathways are lengthy, and companies depend heavily on predictable review standards, communication and enforcement timelines.

Under Koplow’s permanent leadership, the pace of review, treatment of innovative products and balance between adult access and youth protection will remain key regulatory signals for the U.S. vaping, nicotine pouch and heated tobacco markets.

Follow 2Firsts for timely updates on global tobacco and nicotine regulations, market developments and industry trends.

Cover Image:FDA


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18
UAE Sets Dh1-Per-ml Minimum Excise Price for Vape Liquids From Sept. 1 While Keeping 100% Tax Rate
UAE Sets Dh1-Per-ml Minimum Excise Price for Vape Liquids From Sept. 1 While Keeping 100% Tax Rate
The UAE Ministry of Finance will introduce a minimum excise price for e-liquids used in vaping and electronic smoking devices from September 1, 2026. The minimum excise price will be set at AED 1 per millilitre. The existing 100% excise tax rate will continue to apply to tobacco and electronic smoking products. The measure changes the minimum taxable base rather than the tax rate, with the UAE government saying it aims to establish unified tax standards, improve market compliance and prevent pricing loopholes.
Regulations
Aug.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
A new Indiana law restricting the sale of foreign-made vape products has taken effect, requiring retailers to adjust inventory and sourcing practices. According to The Sun, WDRB and other reports, some local vape shops are reviewing product origins and supplier information to comply with the new requirements. The measure represents a broader shift in U.S. vape regulation, with oversight expanding beyond product authorization and sales rules toward manufacturing origin and supply-chain management.
Jul.24
Former FDA Scientist Questions ZYN Review Over Pouch Material and Microplastic Risk
Former FDA Scientist Questions ZYN Review Over Pouch Material and Microplastic Risk
A former FDA toxicologist has questioned whether the agency fully assessed the material used in ZYN nicotine pouches before authorizing them for sale, raising concerns over possible microplastic exposure, according to STAT and The Examination.
Jul.16
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04