Bacolod City Recalls Anti-Smoking Task Force After Pandemic Hiatus

Sep.20.2022
Bacolod City Recalls Anti-Smoking Task Force After Pandemic Hiatus
Bacolod Mayor reactivates anti-smoking task force to enforce smoking ban after COVID-19 outbreak.

Bacolod City - Mayor Alfredo Abelardo Benitez has reconvened the Bacolod Anti-Smoking Task Force (BASTF) to suspend the implementation of the city's anti-smoking ordinance, which was in effect before the outbreak of the 2019 coronavirus pandemic.


BASTF had previously convened and formed an action group to carry out the regulation, but due to the emergence of the pandemic, the operation was ultimately stopped," said the chairperson of the task force, Bennetts. The vice chairperson, lawmaker Simplicia Distrito, served as the chairperson of the task force.


A copy of administrative order number 34-22, released by the city government on Monday, states that BASTF and new members will continue to implement, strengthen, and oversee the order, while ensuring protection against interference from the tobacco industry.


It will also conduct educational and promotional activities, information dissemination plans, and capacity-building initiatives, to provide voters with information and train law enforcement officials.


As the chairman of the working group, Benitez will oversee the implementation of all anti-smoking regulations, including the regulation of e-cigarettes, and supervise the operations of the enforcement officers and action teams.


The mayor has instructed city administrators to assist in monitoring implementation and enforcement, provide regular status updates, and oversee the destruction of noncompliant cigarette products.


He also tasked city health officials with issuing formal subpoena to law enforcement personnel, assigning a hotline or any other number for reporting violations, and appointing city legal officials to assist in reviewing reports and complaints, and provide any legal aid and regulations related to the matter.


Statement:


This article compiles information from third-party sources and is intended for industry-related discussions and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry-related exchange and research.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related expressions and stances.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Alberta Seeks to Add New Vape Restrictions on Top of Existing Tobacco Framework
Alberta Seeks to Add New Vape Restrictions on Top of Existing Tobacco Framework
A new Alberta bill aimed at reducing vaping rates, especially among young people, is moving into the legislative process. Bill 208, the Vaping Reduction Act, was introduced by United Conservative Party MLA Chelsae Petrovic and appears to build on the province’s existing Tobacco, Smoking and Vaping Reduction Act. Early reporting suggests the bill could focus on disposable vapes and impose further limits on youth access to vaping products.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Indonesian drug agency chief proposes ban on e-cigarettes and e-liquid containing harmful substances
Indonesian drug agency chief proposes ban on e-cigarettes and e-liquid containing harmful substances
Indonesian drug agency chief proposes ban on e-cigarette and e-liquid in new draft law, citing dangerous substances found.
Apr.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Serbian Parliament Passes Trade Laws Banning Sales of E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Products to Minors
Serbian Parliament Passes Trade Laws Banning Sales of E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Products to Minors
Serbia’s parliament has adopted a package of trade laws aimed at increasing consumer protection while introducing a range of changes for merchants and online platforms. One of the most important new measures is a ban on the sale of e-cigarettes and other nicotine products to minors, tightening youth protection rules.
Apr.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexico’s Coahuila State Passes Vape Ban Covering Non-Nicotine Devices and Heated Tobacco Products
Mexico’s Coahuila State Passes Vape Ban Covering Non-Nicotine Devices and Heated Tobacco Products
The Congress of Coahuila in Mexico has approved a ban on the sale, use and promotion of vapes and similar devices, citing their harmful effects on health and the environment.
Mar.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Labeled “Built in the USA” Up to 60,000 Puffs: DOJO PUREX 60K Launches on U.S. Sales Channels
Product | Labeled “Built in the USA” Up to 60,000 Puffs: DOJO PUREX 60K Launches on U.S. Sales Channels
DOJO unveiled the PUREX 60K e-cigarette at TPE 2026 held in Las Vegas, United States. The product is labeled “Built in the USA,” supports up to 60,000 puffs, and features 16ml e-liquid capacity, a 1000mAh battery, and ECO and SMART output modes. It has gone live on DOJO’s official website and select U.S. online sales channels at a price of $18.99.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul are asking a California federal court to pause an antitrust case while they appeal a class certification ruling to the Ninth Circuit. The case alleges that Altria’s 2018 investment in Juul, a $12.8 billion deal for a 35% stake.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai