Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory

Nov.20.2025
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
The High Court in Bangladesh has asked government bodies to explain why the approval granted to Philip Morris to establish a nicotine pouch factory should not be deemed illegal. Petitioners argue the decision contradicts existing policies and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling that restricts new tobacco-related enterprises. Authorities have ten days to respond.

Key Points

 

  • High Court seeks justification for BEZA’s approval of a Philip Morris nicotine pouch plant.
  • Approval issued on 27 April for domestic sales in Bangladesh.
  • Petitioners cite conflict with policy and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling.
  • Prior directives barred new tobacco-related company approvals.
  • Ministries and Philip Morris must respond within ten days.

 


 

2Firsts, November 20, 2025 — According to the report, the Bangladesh High Court has issued a rule seeking justification for the approval allowing Philip Morris to set up a nicotine pouch manufacturing plant in Sonargaon, Narayanganj.

 

The order followed a public interest writ filed by Sayera Nazabi Sayem, Advocate Sajidul Islam, and Mahir Chowdhury, represented in court by Barrister Asif Bin Anwar. The Ministry of Commerce, BEZA, the Ministry of Health, and Philip Morris were directed to respond within ten days.

 

Petitioners stated that BEZA approved the project on 27 April despite government policy and earlier Appellate Division directives restricting the establishment of new tobacco or tobacco-product companies. The approval notes the products would be sold domestically. They argued the decision has already raised concern among social and cultural organisations over potential health and environmental risks.

 

The writ referenced a 1 March 2016 Appellate Division judgment that issued six directives aimed at reducing tobacco use nationwide, including prohibiting new approvals for tobacco-related companies and encouraging existing firms to shift to other industries. Allowing a new nicotine product facility, petitioners said, contradicts these directives and the state’s constitutional obligation to protect public health.

 

The case has renewed scrutiny of regulatory compliance within the tobacco sector. Further proceedings will follow after respondents submit their explanations.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
An opinion article published by Stars and Stripes argued that the Pentagon’s January nicotine clinical guidelines overemphasize abstinence, fail to reflect the reality that about 30% of active-duty personnel use nicotine, and do not address nicotine pouches as potential harm-reduction products.
Industry Insight
Jun.08
Vietnam’s Vape Crackdown Expands From Ban Proposal to Grassroots Enforcement
Vietnam’s Vape Crackdown Expands From Ban Proposal to Grassroots Enforcement
Vietnam tightens e-cigarette rules. Health Ministry proposes banning production, trade, transport, storage, ads, promotion, sponsorship, and use of e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, and new products. Hanoi also urges residents to report illegal activities, showing enforcement moves from lawmaking to local action.
Jul.08
Opinion | As EU Reviews Tobacco Rules, Experts Warn Against Overlooking Smokers’ Alternatives
Opinion | As EU Reviews Tobacco Rules, Experts Warn Against Overlooking Smokers’ Alternatives
As the European Commission reviews its tobacco and advertising rules, two experts who provided written comments to 2Firsts argue that future EU policy should not overlook adult smokers’ alternatives. Dr Garrett McGovern and Dr Carmen Escrig say regulators should weigh relative risk, adult switching, flavours, consumer behaviour and scientific uncertainty alongside youth protection.
Industry Insight
Jun.01
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania Updates ENDS Certification List as Chinese-Linked Manufacturers Enter State Review
Pennsylvania’s June 26 Pending ENDS Certifications list includes 23 manufacturers under review, including Shenzhen Smoore, Shenzhen IVPS, YME Technology and China-linked Boulder International. The list shows state-level vape regulation moving beyond retail brands toward manufacturer-based market access alongside FDA oversight.
Regulations
Jul.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives
From Brands to Supply Chains: 2Firsts Builds a PMTA Compliance Service System for the U.S. Market
From Brands to Supply Chains: 2Firsts Builds a PMTA Compliance Service System for the U.S. Market
2Firsts supports new tobacco and nicotine companies entering the U.S. market with full-chain PMTA compliance services.
Jun.04
Tasmania Reports Annual Enforcement Results: 5.5 Million Illegal Cigarettes and Nearly 30,000 Vapes Seized, With IGET Products Visible in Official Images
Tasmania Reports Annual Enforcement Results: 5.5 Million Illegal Cigarettes and Nearly 30,000 Vapes Seized, With IGET Products Visible in Official Images
Tasmania reported its 2025/26 illicit tobacco enforcement results on July 14, with authorities seizing about 5.5 million illegal cigarettes, more than 2,500 kilograms of loose tobacco and nearly 30,000 vapes.
Jul.15