Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory

Nov.20.2025
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
The High Court in Bangladesh has asked government bodies to explain why the approval granted to Philip Morris to establish a nicotine pouch factory should not be deemed illegal. Petitioners argue the decision contradicts existing policies and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling that restricts new tobacco-related enterprises. Authorities have ten days to respond.

Key Points

 

  • High Court seeks justification for BEZA’s approval of a Philip Morris nicotine pouch plant.
  • Approval issued on 27 April for domestic sales in Bangladesh.
  • Petitioners cite conflict with policy and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling.
  • Prior directives barred new tobacco-related company approvals.
  • Ministries and Philip Morris must respond within ten days.

 


 

2Firsts, November 20, 2025 — According to the report, the Bangladesh High Court has issued a rule seeking justification for the approval allowing Philip Morris to set up a nicotine pouch manufacturing plant in Sonargaon, Narayanganj.

 

The order followed a public interest writ filed by Sayera Nazabi Sayem, Advocate Sajidul Islam, and Mahir Chowdhury, represented in court by Barrister Asif Bin Anwar. The Ministry of Commerce, BEZA, the Ministry of Health, and Philip Morris were directed to respond within ten days.

 

Petitioners stated that BEZA approved the project on 27 April despite government policy and earlier Appellate Division directives restricting the establishment of new tobacco or tobacco-product companies. The approval notes the products would be sold domestically. They argued the decision has already raised concern among social and cultural organisations over potential health and environmental risks.

 

The writ referenced a 1 March 2016 Appellate Division judgment that issued six directives aimed at reducing tobacco use nationwide, including prohibiting new approvals for tobacco-related companies and encouraging existing firms to shift to other industries. Allowing a new nicotine product facility, petitioners said, contradicts these directives and the state’s constitutional obligation to protect public health.

 

The case has renewed scrutiny of regulatory compliance within the tobacco sector. Further proceedings will follow after respondents submit their explanations.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

2Firsts Hosts UK Vape Duty Stamp Compliance Exchange in Shenzhen
2Firsts Hosts UK Vape Duty Stamp Compliance Exchange in Shenzhen
2Firsts held a UK vape duty stamp compliance exchange in Shenzhen on May 14, bringing together representatives from nearly 20 companies. The session addressed Vaping Products Duty, duty stamp applications, UK agency qualifications and warehousing, while introducing 2Firsts Compliance Solutions’ UK service.
Events
May.17
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
China has launched mandatory national standards work for heated cigarettes and nicotine pouches, further formalizing regulation of both categories. The move may help lay groundwork for future market entry, but does not signal imminent domestic commercialization.
Apr.15
New Mexico Attorney General Files Lawsuit Over Sales of Flavored Disposable E-Cigarettes
New Mexico Attorney General Files Lawsuit Over Sales of Flavored Disposable E-Cigarettes
The New Mexico Department of Justice announced that it has filed a lawsuit against major convenience store chains and distributors, alleging that they sold flavored disposable e-cigarettes and contributed to youth nicotine addiction across the state.
Apr.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Canada’s Federal Vape Flavor Restrictions Remain Unclear Five Years After Announcement
Canada’s Federal Vape Flavor Restrictions Remain Unclear Five Years After Announcement
Five years after Canada’s federal government announced plans to restrict vaping flavors nationwide, Health Minister Marjorie Michel has not said when or whether the measure will still proceed. In 2021, Health Canada said it planned to limit vaping flavors nationwide to mint, menthol and tobacco, citing evidence that fruity and sweet flavors appeal to youth.
May.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
 BAT London Shares Gain 13.99% as FDA Vape Decision Draws Market Attention
BAT London Shares Gain 13.99% as FDA Vape Decision Draws Market Attention
British American Tobacco’s London-listed shares rose 13.99% last week, as investors focused on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s recent authorization of flavored Glas e-cigarette products, the dismissal of a U.S. sanctions-related criminal case against BAT, and the company’s previously announced share buyback plan and newer nicotine business performance.
BAT
May.18
UK Retailers Call on Government to Better Resource Trading Standards to Fight Illicit Tobacco and Vape Trade
UK Retailers Call on Government to Better Resource Trading Standards to Fight Illicit Tobacco and Vape Trade
Retailers in the UK have called on the government to provide greater resources to Trading Standards in response to the growing trade in illicit tobacco and vapes. Fed national vice-president Hemanshu Patel made the call during a panel discussion at the National Convenience Show in Birmingham on April 15.
Apr.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai