California's Youth Smoking and Vaping Rates Decrease in 2021

Oct.18.2022
California's Youth Smoking and Vaping Rates Decrease in 2021
The CHKS report shows a decline in tobacco and e-cigarette use among California students, attributed to T21 law.

According to a report from the California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS), only 1% of 7th and 9th-grade students, and 2% of 11th-grade students reported smoking in 2021, defined as smoking "one or more days" within 30 days prior to the survey. The data also shows that since 2015, smoking rates have decreased by 50% among 7th-grade students, 75% among 9th-grade students, and 71.4% among 11th-grade students.


Furthermore, the use of e-cigarettes has also dropped. According to a survey, e-cigarette usage peaked in 2015, with 7% of students, 13% of 9th graders, and 14% of 11th graders reporting they had used e-cigarettes in the 30 days prior to the survey. However, in 2021, this rate hit an all-time low, with only 2% of 7th graders, 6% of 9th graders, and 10% of 11th graders reporting current e-cigarette use.


Earlier this year, additional data was released regarding the legal impact of California in 2016, which reported a positive trend. The law raised the legal age for tobacco sales from 18 to 21 (T21). In 2016, California passed a law that raised the age limit for tobacco sales from 18 to 21. The Pacific Research and Evaluation Prevention Research Center conducted a study called "New research investigating the impact of California's minimum age of 21 for tobacco sales.


Data compilation shows that the T21 law has had a positive impact on public health among 7th, 9th, and 11th grade students statewide. The survey results are summarized on News-Medical.


Reduce the prevalence of lifelong use of combustible tobacco and e-cigarettes, as well as the past month's use of combustible tobacco among the entire student population.


Over the past month, there has been an increase in the usage of electronic cigarettes.


Reduce lifetime and past 30-day use of all tobacco and nicotine products among Latinx youth.


Positive public health impacts on other racial and ethnic groups that are distinct.


Title: California's E-cigarette Usage Rates, T21, California Health Children Survey A recent survey in California has revealed significant statistics on the usage of electronic cigarettes, also known as e-cigarettes, in the state. The survey also examined the T21, a law that raises the minimum age for buying tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to 21. The survey, named California Health Children Survey, reported that 7% of surveyed high school students had used e-cigarettes at least once in the past 30 days. Moreover, 15% of 11th graders reported current usage of e-cigarettes. The survey also showed that T21 has resulted in a decrease in tobacco product usage among youths under 21 years old. There has been a significant drop in the usage of e-cigarettes, with a decrease of 6% in the past 12 months alone. Overall, the survey suggests that e-cigarette usage remains an issue in California, particularly among high school students. However, the implementation of T21 has shown a positive impact in decreasing tobacco usage among younger demographics, including e-cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry discussion and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of its contents. The translation of this article is intended only for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or international statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
Spanish newspaper El Confidencial interviewed Fred Monteiro, Regional Director for Americas and Europe at British American Tobacco (BAT). Monteiro said BAT supports setting regulatory limits for nicotine products but opposes Spain’s proposed 0.99mg nicotine-per-pouch limit, arguing that such a restriction could affect adult smokers’ transition to alternatives. He said nicotine regulation should be based on scientific evidence and harm reduction principles. Monteiro also said smoke-free products now account for around 25% of BAT’s Americas and Europe business and nearly 30% of its Europe business
BAT
Jul.30
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation party has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 75%, arguing that lower legal cigarette prices could narrow the gap with illicit tobacco and reduce demand for black-market products. The proposal comes as Australia continues expanding enforcement against illicit tobacco supply chains through border controls, retail inspections and organised-crime investigations. Supporters argue high taxes have contributed to illicit-market growth, while opponents warn that lower tobacco prices could undermine public-health goals. The proposal is a party policy position and has not been adopted by the Australian government.
Aug.18
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
The UK government has announced that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will carry out more than 30,000 interventions targeting businesses and retail premises during the 2026-2027 financial year. The actions will focus on tax fraud, illegal goods sales and businesses involved in unlawful activities through retail channels. The government said illegal tobacco and illegal vape sales remain areas of concern. The move shows that UK enforcement against illegal nicotine products is expanding from import and supply channels toward retail-level oversight, alongside the upcoming introduction of the Vaping Products Duty.
Jul.24
EU Trade Department Faces Scrutiny Over Contacts With Tobacco Industry
EU Trade Department Faces Scrutiny Over Contacts With Tobacco Industry
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has opened an inquiry into how the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Trade handles interactions with the tobacco industry. The case follows a complaint from a civil society organisation that alleges regular, unnecessary and non-transparent contacts between DG TRADE and tobacco industry representatives, raising questions over compliance with the EU’s obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The inquiry remains ongoing, and the Ombudswoman has not reached any finding of maladministration.
Aug.24
Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
U.S. nicotine pouch brand Sesh has emphasized its independence from Altria, Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco, along with backing from investors including 8VC, celebrity supporters and a retail footprint of more than 7,500 stores, as it seeks to differentiate itself in a market where major pouch brands are owned by large tobacco companies.
Regulations
Jul.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives