Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York

Dec.07.2022
Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York
Vermont legalized personal marijuana use for adults, but public consumption is prohibited, making it one of the least friendly states.

In 2018, the state of Vermont passed bill number 86 which legalized the cultivation, possession and consumption of small amounts of marijuana for adults aged 21 and over in their homes. This was two years prior to legislators passing bill number 164 in 2020 which legalized commercial marijuana.


However, it remains one of the least friendly states towards legal consumption.


Who will be most affected by Vermont's cannabis consumption law, why has New York gained recognition for its new consumption law, and what can Vermont's lawmakers do to make the state more cannabis-friendly for its residents and tourists?


The states of Vermont and New York.


In Vermont, it is illegal to consume marijuana in public places. Renters, including those using short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb, must obtain permission from the landlord or property owner before smoking or growing marijuana in their homes, even if they are registered medical marijuana patients or caregivers.


The consumption of marijuana in Vermont is defined as any form of use, such as smoking, vaping, or consuming edibles, all of which are prohibited in public places and subject to civil penalties.


In the state of New York, it is legal to consume marijuana in any public place where smoking is allowed. Tenants and non-property owners are also allowed to consume and cultivate medical marijuana in their homes unless the landlord explicitly prohibits it.


Although New York has not yet legalized adult recreational marijuana cultivation at home, it does allow for medical cultivation and has taken impressive measures to protect the rights of medical patients and caregivers. For example, if a landlord prohibits smoking, patients are allowed to consume marijuana in other forms.


Lawmakers in New York state have placed the responsibility for compliance with their marijuana consumption law on the landlords, while lawmakers in Vermont have placed the responsibility on the tenants.


Who is protected by Vermont state law?


The state of Vermont's law limits marijuana consumption to the private residences of homeowners and tenants who have obtained explicit permission from their landlords. Therefore, homeowners are the main group protected by the law, and looking at who owns the property will tell us who is legally allowed to consume.


According to the latest US Census data, homeownership rates in Vermont by race/ethnicity are as follows: Black - 21.1%, Hispanic - 38.6%, American Indian/Alaska Native - 45.6%, Asian - 50.5%, and White - 72.6%.


Compared to other states, Vermont ranks fifth in terms of the disparity in homeownership rates for Black households nationwide. This data reveals that Black, Indigenous, and people of color communities in Vermont are least likely to own homes, and therefore have the least legal protection when it comes to consuming cannabis.


Apart from the low homeownership rate among BIPOC communities in Vermont, a report by the ACLU has found that despite the legalization of cannabis in 2018, black individuals in Vermont are arrested more frequently than their white counterparts for cannabis-related offenses, even though usage rates are similar.


Providing legal marijuana consumption spaces for all Vermont residents is an urgent public safety issue.


Tourists and visitors to Vermont are also affected by the law, as public consumption is prohibited and short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb require clear permits under the law. The tourism industry, which annually welcomes more than 13 million visitors, is an important sector in Vermont. If adults visiting Vermont can responsibly enjoy tobacco legally, then they should also be able to enjoy marijuana in the same way.


How can Vermont lawmakers improve the law?


Due to the recent midterm elections, the Democratic and Progressive Parties of Vermont now hold a majority in the state legislature and have the power to veto the governor's decisions.


We are calling on Vermont legislators to reexamine the marijuana consumption law during the 2023 legislative session and legalize public marijuana consumption in any location where tobacco is allowed, such as New York State. We also propose allowing non-homeowners, such as renters, to consume, possess, and grow marijuana unless explicitly prohibited by their landlord or property owner. Additionally, we suggest creating a new license category to allow consumption establishments and events, providing some form of direct-to-consumer access for growers and manufacturers.


The communities in Vermont have historically been targets of prohibition, and even with legalization, they continue to be targeted by law enforcement, not protected under the state's marijuana consumption laws. This is harmful public policy. Additionally, adult visitors to Vermont find themselves in a contradictory position, legally able to purchase marijuana and marijuana products but with no legal place to consume them.


New York lawmakers have begun securing the right for their residents and visitors to consume marijuana. Lawmakers in Vermont should follow suit by 2023, while also addressing the numerous flaws in the adult-use market, rather than replacing other jobs.


2FIRSTS will continue to track and report on this issue, with updates available on the '2FIRSTS APP.' Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands has agreed to acquire 100% of Swedish modern oral nicotine company Yoik Group AB for an initial SEK515 million, equivalent to about US$53.9 million, plus a deferred payment linked to performance over the next two years. Yoik owns nicotine pouch brand Helwit, which held about 3.4% of Sweden’s modern oral nicotine market over the past 12 months. Imperial says the acquisition will more than double its existing share of the Swedish market. Helwit is also sold elsewhere in the Nordics, through European online channels and in selected UK retail outlets.
Sep.08
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
UK Vape Maker Riot Enters Clacton By-Election to Fight Government 'White Packaging' Proposals
British e-liquid manufacturer Riot Labs has introduced a fictional “candidate” called Riot Man around the Clacton parliamentary by-election, seeking to mobilize consumers and retailers against parts of the UK government’s proposed restrictions on vape packaging, device appearance and retail displays. Riot Man is not listed as an official candidate.
Aug.12
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is pushing a high street reform agenda that could give local authorities greater powers over commercial activity, including vape retail. The reforms could involve expanded planning powers and a potential vape retail licensing system, allowing councils to play a larger role in store locations and market access. The measures are part of the UK’s broader shift toward tighter vape regulation, although no nationwide vape retail restrictions have yet been implemented.
Aug.11
BAT’s Velo Study Finds 61% of Nicotine Users Feel More Comfortable Expressing Themselves When Others Do the Same
BAT’s Velo Study Finds 61% of Nicotine Users Feel More Comfortable Expressing Themselves When Others Do the Same
British American Tobacco’s (BAT) nicotine pouch brand Velo has released a global consumer study and launched its “Echoes of Tomorrowland” campaign with electronic music festival brand Tomorrowland. The research surveyed 2,009 nicotine users across the UK, Spain, Pakistan, Poland and Austria. Velo said 61% of respondents feel more comfortable expressing themselves when they see others doing the same, while 39% said building meaningful connections becomes harder with age. The campaign reflects how nicotine pouch brands are increasingly using music, communities and lifestyle marketing to build consumer engagement.
Aug.10
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16