Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York

Dec.07.2022
Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York
Vermont legalized personal marijuana use for adults, but public consumption is prohibited, making it one of the least friendly states.

In 2018, the state of Vermont passed bill number 86 which legalized the cultivation, possession and consumption of small amounts of marijuana for adults aged 21 and over in their homes. This was two years prior to legislators passing bill number 164 in 2020 which legalized commercial marijuana.


However, it remains one of the least friendly states towards legal consumption.


Who will be most affected by Vermont's cannabis consumption law, why has New York gained recognition for its new consumption law, and what can Vermont's lawmakers do to make the state more cannabis-friendly for its residents and tourists?


The states of Vermont and New York.


In Vermont, it is illegal to consume marijuana in public places. Renters, including those using short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb, must obtain permission from the landlord or property owner before smoking or growing marijuana in their homes, even if they are registered medical marijuana patients or caregivers.


The consumption of marijuana in Vermont is defined as any form of use, such as smoking, vaping, or consuming edibles, all of which are prohibited in public places and subject to civil penalties.


In the state of New York, it is legal to consume marijuana in any public place where smoking is allowed. Tenants and non-property owners are also allowed to consume and cultivate medical marijuana in their homes unless the landlord explicitly prohibits it.


Although New York has not yet legalized adult recreational marijuana cultivation at home, it does allow for medical cultivation and has taken impressive measures to protect the rights of medical patients and caregivers. For example, if a landlord prohibits smoking, patients are allowed to consume marijuana in other forms.


Lawmakers in New York state have placed the responsibility for compliance with their marijuana consumption law on the landlords, while lawmakers in Vermont have placed the responsibility on the tenants.


Who is protected by Vermont state law?


The state of Vermont's law limits marijuana consumption to the private residences of homeowners and tenants who have obtained explicit permission from their landlords. Therefore, homeowners are the main group protected by the law, and looking at who owns the property will tell us who is legally allowed to consume.


According to the latest US Census data, homeownership rates in Vermont by race/ethnicity are as follows: Black - 21.1%, Hispanic - 38.6%, American Indian/Alaska Native - 45.6%, Asian - 50.5%, and White - 72.6%.


Compared to other states, Vermont ranks fifth in terms of the disparity in homeownership rates for Black households nationwide. This data reveals that Black, Indigenous, and people of color communities in Vermont are least likely to own homes, and therefore have the least legal protection when it comes to consuming cannabis.


Apart from the low homeownership rate among BIPOC communities in Vermont, a report by the ACLU has found that despite the legalization of cannabis in 2018, black individuals in Vermont are arrested more frequently than their white counterparts for cannabis-related offenses, even though usage rates are similar.


Providing legal marijuana consumption spaces for all Vermont residents is an urgent public safety issue.


Tourists and visitors to Vermont are also affected by the law, as public consumption is prohibited and short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb require clear permits under the law. The tourism industry, which annually welcomes more than 13 million visitors, is an important sector in Vermont. If adults visiting Vermont can responsibly enjoy tobacco legally, then they should also be able to enjoy marijuana in the same way.


How can Vermont lawmakers improve the law?


Due to the recent midterm elections, the Democratic and Progressive Parties of Vermont now hold a majority in the state legislature and have the power to veto the governor's decisions.


We are calling on Vermont legislators to reexamine the marijuana consumption law during the 2023 legislative session and legalize public marijuana consumption in any location where tobacco is allowed, such as New York State. We also propose allowing non-homeowners, such as renters, to consume, possess, and grow marijuana unless explicitly prohibited by their landlord or property owner. Additionally, we suggest creating a new license category to allow consumption establishments and events, providing some form of direct-to-consumer access for growers and manufacturers.


The communities in Vermont have historically been targets of prohibition, and even with legalization, they continue to be targeted by law enforcement, not protected under the state's marijuana consumption laws. This is harmful public policy. Additionally, adult visitors to Vermont find themselves in a contradictory position, legally able to purchase marijuana and marijuana products but with no legal place to consume them.


New York lawmakers have begun securing the right for their residents and visitors to consume marijuana. Lawmakers in Vermont should follow suit by 2023, while also addressing the numerous flaws in the adult-use market, rather than replacing other jobs.


2FIRSTS will continue to track and report on this issue, with updates available on the '2FIRSTS APP.' Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

France’s Top Administrative Court Suspends Nicotine Pouch Decree
France’s Top Administrative Court Suspends Nicotine Pouch Decree
France’s Council of State has suspended a government decree that was set to ban the manufacture, production and export of nicotine pouches from April 2026. The court ruled that companies were not given sufficient time to reorganise their operations. A final decision on the legality of the decree is expected by June 2026. The court noted that the commercial sale of nicotine pouches is already restricted under existing public health laws.
Dec.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT CEO: to ramp up ‘next-generation’ tobacco capacity in Italy, plans €500 mln investment in Trieste plant by 2027
BAT CEO: to ramp up ‘next-generation’ tobacco capacity in Italy, plans €500 mln investment in Trieste plant by 2027
British American Tobacco (BAT) CEO Tadeu Marroco said the group will continue to invest in equipment and technology in Italy and expand capacity for next-generation tobacco products such as e-cigarettes and heated tobacco. BAT’s Trieste innovation hub is slated to receive a total investment of 500 million euros by 2027 and add 16 new production lines.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK Disposable Vape Ban Fallout: Convenience Vape Units Down 20.8%, Retailers Hit by a “Triple Whammy,” Talysis Says
UK Disposable Vape Ban Fallout: Convenience Vape Units Down 20.8%, Retailers Hit by a “Triple Whammy,” Talysis Says
UK convenience insight agency Talysis says vape unit sales in convenience stores have fallen 20.8% and value sales 12.7% nearly eight months after the disposable vape ban took effect.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s Tobacco and Vape Retail Licensing Regime Takes Effect; BAT Says It Should Cover Nicotine Pouches
Ireland’s retail licensing system took effect on Feb. 2, 2026, charging annual fees per point of sale and enforced by the Health Service Executive (HSE). British American Tobacco’s local unit, BAT Ireland, said excluding nicotine pouches could leave a regulatory gap.
Feb.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
British American Tobacco to close South Africa cigarette plant by end-2026, citing illicit trade squeezing legal market
British American Tobacco to close South Africa cigarette plant by end-2026, citing illicit trade squeezing legal market
British American Tobacco South Africa (BATSA) said it will halt local production of factory-made cigarettes and close its manufacturing plant in Heidelberg, Gauteng by the end of 2026, shifting to an import-led supply model. The company said illicit cigarettes now account for about 75% of South Africa’s market, making local manufacturing “unsustainable” and putting around 230 jobs at risk.
Jan.16
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
San Francisco reaches $1 million settlement with nicotine pouch retailer Lucy Goods
In the United States, California, San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu announced a $1 million settlement requiring online tobacco retailer Lucy Goods, Inc. to stop shipping illegal tobacco products into San Francisco.
Jan.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai