Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York

Dec.07.2022
Challenges of Legal Marijuana Consumption in Vermont and New York
Vermont legalized personal marijuana use for adults, but public consumption is prohibited, making it one of the least friendly states.

In 2018, the state of Vermont passed bill number 86 which legalized the cultivation, possession and consumption of small amounts of marijuana for adults aged 21 and over in their homes. This was two years prior to legislators passing bill number 164 in 2020 which legalized commercial marijuana.


However, it remains one of the least friendly states towards legal consumption.


Who will be most affected by Vermont's cannabis consumption law, why has New York gained recognition for its new consumption law, and what can Vermont's lawmakers do to make the state more cannabis-friendly for its residents and tourists?


The states of Vermont and New York.


In Vermont, it is illegal to consume marijuana in public places. Renters, including those using short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb, must obtain permission from the landlord or property owner before smoking or growing marijuana in their homes, even if they are registered medical marijuana patients or caregivers.


The consumption of marijuana in Vermont is defined as any form of use, such as smoking, vaping, or consuming edibles, all of which are prohibited in public places and subject to civil penalties.


In the state of New York, it is legal to consume marijuana in any public place where smoking is allowed. Tenants and non-property owners are also allowed to consume and cultivate medical marijuana in their homes unless the landlord explicitly prohibits it.


Although New York has not yet legalized adult recreational marijuana cultivation at home, it does allow for medical cultivation and has taken impressive measures to protect the rights of medical patients and caregivers. For example, if a landlord prohibits smoking, patients are allowed to consume marijuana in other forms.


Lawmakers in New York state have placed the responsibility for compliance with their marijuana consumption law on the landlords, while lawmakers in Vermont have placed the responsibility on the tenants.


Who is protected by Vermont state law?


The state of Vermont's law limits marijuana consumption to the private residences of homeowners and tenants who have obtained explicit permission from their landlords. Therefore, homeowners are the main group protected by the law, and looking at who owns the property will tell us who is legally allowed to consume.


According to the latest US Census data, homeownership rates in Vermont by race/ethnicity are as follows: Black - 21.1%, Hispanic - 38.6%, American Indian/Alaska Native - 45.6%, Asian - 50.5%, and White - 72.6%.


Compared to other states, Vermont ranks fifth in terms of the disparity in homeownership rates for Black households nationwide. This data reveals that Black, Indigenous, and people of color communities in Vermont are least likely to own homes, and therefore have the least legal protection when it comes to consuming cannabis.


Apart from the low homeownership rate among BIPOC communities in Vermont, a report by the ACLU has found that despite the legalization of cannabis in 2018, black individuals in Vermont are arrested more frequently than their white counterparts for cannabis-related offenses, even though usage rates are similar.


Providing legal marijuana consumption spaces for all Vermont residents is an urgent public safety issue.


Tourists and visitors to Vermont are also affected by the law, as public consumption is prohibited and short-term rentals, hotels, and Airbnb require clear permits under the law. The tourism industry, which annually welcomes more than 13 million visitors, is an important sector in Vermont. If adults visiting Vermont can responsibly enjoy tobacco legally, then they should also be able to enjoy marijuana in the same way.


How can Vermont lawmakers improve the law?


Due to the recent midterm elections, the Democratic and Progressive Parties of Vermont now hold a majority in the state legislature and have the power to veto the governor's decisions.


We are calling on Vermont legislators to reexamine the marijuana consumption law during the 2023 legislative session and legalize public marijuana consumption in any location where tobacco is allowed, such as New York State. We also propose allowing non-homeowners, such as renters, to consume, possess, and grow marijuana unless explicitly prohibited by their landlord or property owner. Additionally, we suggest creating a new license category to allow consumption establishments and events, providing some form of direct-to-consumer access for growers and manufacturers.


The communities in Vermont have historically been targets of prohibition, and even with legalization, they continue to be targeted by law enforcement, not protected under the state's marijuana consumption laws. This is harmful public policy. Additionally, adult visitors to Vermont find themselves in a contradictory position, legally able to purchase marijuana and marijuana products but with no legal place to consume them.


New York lawmakers have begun securing the right for their residents and visitors to consume marijuana. Lawmakers in Vermont should follow suit by 2023, while also addressing the numerous flaws in the adult-use market, rather than replacing other jobs.


2FIRSTS will continue to track and report on this issue, with updates available on the '2FIRSTS APP.' Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
KIWI has launched the Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro refillable pod systems in Germany at official prices of €18 and €29, respectively. Spark 2 uses an 800mAh removable lithium-ion battery in a pen-style body, while Spark 2 Pro features a 1,400mAh removable battery, a box-shaped design and vibration feedback every 20 puffs. Both devices use the same 2ml Spark V2 pods in 0.8Ω and 1.2Ω versions, with AirSync airflow adjustment and a choice between Cotton Tips and conventional Drip Tips. The new pods also remain compatible with the original KIWI Spark.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Special Report|CrossBar's High-Puff Vapes Draw Attention on Pennsylvania's 163-Product Directory as Link Between Earlier 1.3mL PMTA Filings and New 13mL Products Remains Unclear
Pennsylvania began enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. Among 163 product listings recorded before enforcement, four CrossBar 20K disposables stood out with 13mL capacity, advertised puff counts of up to 20,000 and a flattened design distinct from conventional pod systems and compact disposables. Historical records identify earlier 1.3mL CrossBar products associated with Romo LLC, while newer 13mL products appeared in several state directories beginning in 2025 under entities including Blue Nine LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K identified amendments and application ownership transfers as possible regulatory mechanisms, although neither has been confirmed in this case. Separately, Reynolds' $7.5 million acquisition of 16 PACHA products and related assets illustrates the commercial value of products linked to historic PMTA submissions.
Special Report
Oct.22
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi on Oct. 6 questioned the FDA over its plan to reassess and potentially replace the 2021 PMTA regulatory framework, asking the agency to identify provisions it may change or eliminate, state whether current scientific evidentiary standards will be maintained, and disclose communications with Altria, Reynolds and other parties challenging the rule. Krishnamoorthi led a congressional investigation into JUUL and youth vaping in 2019 and has since remained active on e-cigarette regulation and enforcement.
Regulations
Oct.08
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
A U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an initial determination on October 20, 2026, finding that certain Glas vaping devices, cartridges and components infringed 12 claims across two patents asserted by JUUL, constituting a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against the Glas respondents. Five months earlier, the FDA authorized four Glas e-cigarette pods, including mango, blueberry and two menthol variants. The patent investigation concerns device and cartridge structures and is separate from FDA premarket review. The proposed import restrictions have not become final, and their product-level scope remains unresolved.
company
Nov.05