Exploring Vietnam's Electronic Cigarette Market

May.11.2023
Exploring Vietnam's Electronic Cigarette Market
2FIRSTS explores Vietnam's e-cigarette market, lacking dominant global brands and unclear regulations. Increasing usage, but still a grey market.

Special Statement:


This article is only intended for internal industry research and exchange, and does not make any brand or product recommendations. Minors are prohibited from accessing it.


Vietnam, with a population of over 99.5 million people, ranks 15th in the world and has the second largest population in Southeast Asia, after Indonesia and the Philippines. According to statistics from the Vietnamese Ministry of Health in 2022, the usage of e-cigarettes in 34 provinces and cities in Vietnam was only 0.2% in 2015. However, by 2022, this figure had increased 18-fold to reach 3.6%.


Vietnam's regulations for electronic cigarettes are unclear, leading many in the industry to refer to it as a "grey market". The current state of the electronic cigarette market in Vietnam is unfamiliar to outsiders, prompting 2FIRSTS to conduct field research by visiting over ten e-cigarette shops in Ho Chi Minh City. The findings revealed that global brands are already present in the Vietnamese market, but there is a lack of dominant brands.


There is currently no dominant brand in the market.


Walking into an electronic cigarette store in Ho Chi Minh City, shelves are lined with boxes of electronic cigarette products - many of which are vastly different from those found in Western markets, featuring several unfamiliar brands, alongside popular European and American brands such as ELFBAR and LOST MARY.


When requesting physical samples of brands such as ELFBAR and LOST MARY from the store clerk, they indicated that only the packaging boxes on the shelves were available.


The fourth floor features ELFBAR and LOST MARY products. Image source: 2FIRSTS.


At another electronic cigarette store, shelves displayed a wide variety of electronic cigarette products, including the Aspire brand, which were arranged by brand on different levels of the shelves.


The second row of Aspire packages in black | Image source: 2FIRSTS.


A characteristic of Vietnam's e-cigarette stores is the absence of a dominant global brand. In contrast to the saturated e-cigarette market in Russia, Vietnam lags behind both in product quantity and dominant brand presence.


Russian electronic cigarette store | Image source: 2FIRSTS


The sources of some products are a mystery.


At an electronic cigarette shop, promotional materials for the brand ZOVOO are displayed on the store counter, with a focus on their disposable electronic cigarette product, VINCIBAR.


In the promotional materials provided, three QR codes and a website were presented for scanning. After testing by 2FIRSTS, it was confirmed that the displayed QR codes and website were indeed ZOVOO's official account and website.


Shop promotional materials | Image source: 2FIRSTS


Main product | Image source: 2FIRSTS


Product promotional materials from RELX have been spotted in multiple e-cigarette stores, featuring discount promotions, and displayed in prominent locations.


RELX offers promotional deals. Image source: 2FIRSTS.


Promotional information from RELX | Image Source: 2FIRSTS


It is currently unclear whether domestic brand electronic cigarettes appearing in the Vietnamese market are genuine products from the original manufacturer, and whether the propaganda material suppliers for electronic cigarette shops are directly associated with the manufacturers. However, based on the degree of professionalism in the material production, it is unlikely that Vietnamese electronic cigarette shops are producing the materials in-house.


It is reported that the Vietnamese government does not allow the marketing and circulation of electronic cigarettes, and related legislation is still pending submission for discussion by the Ministry of Industry and Trade.


It is noteworthy that according to information obtained from product packaging by 2FIRSTS, some products sold in electronic cigarette stores are marked as designated for sale in the United States only (Sale only allowed in United States).


The image source, 2FIRSTS, has a notice indicating that the sale of the product is solely allowed in the United States.


2FIRSTS purchased an electronic cigarette brand called Dragbar, packaged under the name ZOVOO, from a vaping store. The product features a production date and batch information on its side.


Product Batch: Image sourced from 2FIRSTS.


Stay tuned for more updates on the electronic cigarette market in Vietnam from 2FIRSTS.


Cover image source: Unsplash library.


References:


Vietnam's Population


The use of electronic cigarettes has increased by 18 times after 5 years, causing numerous unpredictable health consequences.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
A September online survey commissioned by Japanese smoking-accessories company Lightec found that 49.5% of respondents would consider reducing tobacco use if prices rose further, while 25.1% would consider switching to cheaper brands and 14.5% would consider using or combining alternatives such as vapes and nicotine-free herbal sticks. Another 64.6% expressed some level of interest in such alternatives. The survey covered 1,088 respondents aged 20 to 70 and was conducted by a company that sells NICOLESS nicotine-free vaping and herbal-stick products, meaning its findings should not be treated as representative of Japan's smoking population.
DATA
Oct.12
Global Nicotine-Pouch E-Commerce Group Haypp Shuts Sweden’s Snusnetto Over Age Verification as Identity Checks Become Industry Infrastructure for New Nicotine Products
Global Nicotine-Pouch E-Commerce Group Haypp Shuts Sweden’s Snusnetto Over Age Verification as Identity Checks Become Industry Infrastructure for New Nicotine Products
Sweden's Supreme Administrative Court has declined to hear an appeal over age verification for tobacco and nicotine products collected from parcel lockers, leaving in place a lower-court ruling that geo-located BankID verification is insufficient to securely verify the actual recipient. Haypp Group has stopped tobacco and nicotine sales through Snusnetto and is deploying a new system across its other Swedish e-commerce sites to verify the age of the person who actually opens the locker and receives the shipment. The change comes as age verification across next-generation nicotine products expands from purchase checks into retail, delivery and, for some e-cigarettes, device access itself.
Regulations
Oct.20
New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York’s 75% Wholesale Tax on Nicotine Pouches Takes Effect Sept. 1, With Aug. 31 Inventory Subject to Floor Tax
New York State will extend its tobacco products tax to “alternative nicotine products,” including tobacco-free nicotine pouches, from September 1, 2026, at a rate of 75% of the wholesale price. Distributors, wholesalers and retailers must also inventory products held as of 11:59 p.m. on August 31 and pay a floor tax. Vapor products are excluded from the new category and remain subject to New York's separate 20% supplemental sales tax on the retail price.
Aug.26
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products detailed new PMTA review data and process changes at the 2026 FDLI conference. Pending PMTAs fell from about 450,000 at the start of 2025 to 135,000 by September 2026. CTP also discussed its 180-day review goal, current sPMTA pilot, alternate-supplier planning, more than 50,300 pending SE reports, and lessons from the nicotine pouch pilot already being applied to ENDS review.
Regulations
Oct.07