Illicit Vape and Nicotine Pouch Seizures Concentrated in UK Hotspots, New Data Shows

Jun.16
Illicit Vape and Nicotine Pouch Seizures Concentrated in UK Hotspots, New Data Shows
Freedom of Information (FOI) data from the UK shows that more than 3,000 seizures of illegal nicotine products were recorded in the 2024/25 financial year, with Hull, Liverpool and Bolton emerging as the most active enforcement hotspots — highlighting that the problem of illicit vapes, nicotine pouches and smokeless tobacco products persists across many parts of the country.

Key Points

  • Hull ranked first
  • Over 3,000 annual incidents
  • Vapes and pouches involved
  • Hotspots persisted over five years

2Firsts

June 16, 2026 — According to Talking Retail, Freedom of Information (FOI) data analysed by nicotine pouch retailer and information platform Haypp shows UK councils recorded more than 3,000 seizure incidents involving illicit nicotine-containing products in 2024/25, covering vapes, nicotine pouches, smokeless tobacco and other nicotine products.

Hull City Council recorded the highest level of seizure activity in 2024/25, with 318 incidents. The figure accounted for nearly two-fifths, or 39%, of the council’s total seizures over the past five years. The council said it seized more than 2.9 million illicit nicotine items during the year, including more than 2.8 million cigarette sticks and 38,740 e-cigarettes and vapes. The seizures took place at locations including newsagents and vehicles and resulted in 24 enforcement actions.

Liverpool City Council ranked second with 183 seizure incidents. The council reported seizing more than 46,300 illegal nicotine-containing products in 2024/25, with all incidents taking place at convenience stores. The enforcement actions resulted in 30 closure orders. Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council ranked third with 170 seizures and more than 752,000 illicit nicotine items seized from premises including off-licences and vape shops. The seized items included 3,294 nicotine pouch products, 9.27 kilograms of smokeless tobacco, 748,873 cigarette sticks and 239.03 kilograms of hand-rolling tobacco.

Other councils in the top 10 for 2024/25 included Kent County Council with 169 seizure incidents, Stoke-on-Trent City Council with 166, Lancashire County Council with 134, Warwickshire County Council with 93, Coventry City Council with 91, Southwark Borough Council with 85 and Lincolnshire County Council with 85.

Over the five-year period from 2020/21 to 2024/25, Hull City Council also recorded the highest number of seizure incidents, with a total of 815. The council said it seized more than 10.7 million illegal nicotine-containing products during the period, with the highest annual total, almost 4.8 million items, recorded in 2022/23. The number of seizure incidents rose year on year, from 38 in 2020/21 to 318 in 2024/25, an increase of 737%.

Liverpool City Council ranked second over the five-year period with 428 seizure incidents. During that time, the council reported seizing more than 102,130 illicit nicotine items, including more than 88,180 vapes. Lancashire County Council ranked third with 426 incidents and has seized approximately 255,225 illegal nicotine-containing products since 2020/21 from locations including convenience stores, vape shops, barbers, petrol stations and private vehicles.

Marina Murphy, senior director of scientific affairs at Haypp, said illicit nicotine-containing products are a growing issue in the UK. She said such products may include items that have not entered the UK through regular channels or products that do not meet required safety or labelling standards. Because illicit products are manufactured or imported outside regulated channels, consumers cannot be certain about their ingredients or nicotine levels, she said, which may expose them to poor-quality or unsafe products.

Murphy said some products may show clear warning signs of non-compliance, including inconsistent packaging, missing compliance information or sales in unregulated environments such as car boot sales. However, she said it can be difficult to identify an illicit nicotine product, and improving public understanding of these indicators is an important step in raising awareness and helping consumers recognise and avoid non-compliant products.

The data points to a concentration of enforcement activity in certain parts of the UK. For legal retailers and compliant brands, the circulation of illicit products may affect market order and consumer trust. For local enforcement authorities, the increase in recorded seizures also underscores the overlap between vapes, nicotine pouches, smokeless tobacco and traditional tobacco products in retail compliance enforcement.

Follow 2Firsts for the latest updates on global tobacco harm reduction, nicotine products and regulatory developments.

Cover image:talkingretail


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Warns 1,500 Tobacco Retailers Over Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches
Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox has sent notices to more than 1,500 tobacco retailers and distributors warning them against selling vape and nicotine pouch products that lack authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the Alaska Department of Law, businesses were advised to verify products against FDA authorization databases and avoid selling unauthorized nicotine products. The action highlights how state-level enforcement is increasingly extending federal product authorization requirements to retail channels.
Jul.24
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
German prosecutors and customs authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into an alleged cross-border organised vape network. Authorities say that between January 2024 and March 2025, four employees of an unnamed Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer allegedly built a network of sales agents and wholesalers that brought more than 7.6 million nicotine disposable vapes into Germany, causing an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses. The manufacturer has not been named. Some products visible in enforcement images have packaging resembling products from FUMOT’s portfolio. European regulatory records from 2024, FUMOT’s public overseas-sales materials and records involving German vape importer and distribution company Zamu-Pro GmbH also show FUMOT/RandM products and German distribution activity during the period covered by the investigation.
Sep.21
EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
A 12-week European Commission consultation on revising the Tobacco Products Directive and Tobacco Advertising Directive is due to close on Aug. 14, 2026. The Commission has identified e-cigarette flavours, disposable vapes, tobacco heating devices, nicotine pouches, nicotine-free e-cigarettes, packaging and digital marketing among areas for possible new EU rules. National regulations already vary significantly across the bloc, a fragmentation the Commission says creates internal-market barriers and distorts competition. No formal revised TPD/TAD legislative text has yet been published, with the Commission currently indicating December 2026 for the legislative initiative.
Aug.14
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
Chinese authorities have disclosed the country’s first reported criminal case involving counterfeit vapes marketed as “medical nebulizers” and “zero-nicotine” products. Authorities determined that the products involved were counterfeit vapes and pursued criminal charges for producing and selling counterfeit goods. According to the report, the case resulted in the seizure of 347,000 counterfeit vape pods and 53,700 vape devices, with physical goods valued at 22.13 million yuan.
Aug.04