San Diego Considers Ban on Flavored Tobacco Sales

Apr.25.2022
A proposed law in San Diego could end the sale of flavored tobacco products targeting youth, with controversy surrounding its potential impact.

According to a report by the TIMES of SAN DIEGO, the SAAFE Act proposed by San Diego City Council member Marni von Wilpert would ban the sale of flavored straws, flavored cigars, and minty cigarettes targeted at youth if passed. Hookah, premium flavored cigars, flavored loose tobacco, and non-flavored tobacco products would still be available for sale on store shelves.

 

With the proposal of the bill, an end to tobacco sales in San Diego is on the horizon, bringing relief to school districts, youth service organizations, healthcare workers, and parents.

 

The San Diego City Council will discuss the ordinance on Monday, April 25th. Experts predict that the meeting will be very lively.

 

The Neighborhood Market Association, a local tobacco industry lobbying group, has strongly opposed this regulation and cited a study from San Francisco, which found that removing flavored e-cigarettes from retail environments could lead to young people replacing them with traditional cigarettes.

 

Jonathan Winickoff, the Director of Pediatric Research at the esteemed Tobacco Research and Treatment Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, reviewed the study and disagreed with its findings. He pointed out that the study was conducted before the full implementation of the spice tobacco ban in San Francisco, and at the time of the research, only 17% of retailers were complying with the ban. Therefore, the analysis and results cited by opponents are invalid.

 

Winickoff and his colleagues cited data from Oakland that revealed a decrease in the use of regular cigarettes after the restriction of tobacco flavoring. More importantly, they highlighted research indicating that sales restrictions on tobacco flavors in San Francisco resulted in an overall reduction of almost 18% in tobacco use by young people aged 18-24.

 

Therefore, this study demonstrates that halting the sale of flavored tobacco is meaningful. The following facts should be taken into consideration:

 

Children are attracted to flavors. Young people are naturally attracted to sweet, fruity, and minty flavors. When addictive substances such as nicotine are hidden in flavors like passion fruit or sour apple, they are more likely to try them without hesitation.

 

Each vaping device of every flavor contains an amount of nicotine equivalent to one to ten packs of cigarettes. The nicotine content in each device is highly concentrated, and some teenagers consume an entire e-cigarette per day, effectively consuming the nicotine content of 20 to 200 cigarettes.

 

Teenagers' brains are more susceptible to addiction than adults' brains because they are still developing.

 

These facts emphasize why a survey showed that 4 out of every 10 high school students in the San Diego Unified School District have smoked.

 

Editor: Leung Ka-wai

 

Source: Times of San Diego

 

I apologize, but as an AI language model, I cannot provide a direct translation for that link as it is already written in journalistic English. The website, timesofsandiego.com, is a news publication that covers various stories and events happening in the San Diego area using standard journalistic language and style. Is there a specific article or content you need assistance with?

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
Following recent FDA authorizations for JUUL2 and ZYN ULTRA, 2Firsts Compliance Solutions held an online PMTA briefing on Sept. 4 to examine what the decisions may signal about review efficiency, scientific evidence and U.S. market access. Nearly 30 participants from brands, manufacturers, compliance service providers and investment firms joined the discussion.
2Firsts Events
Sep.06
Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands Acquires Helwit Owner Yoik Group for SEK 515 Million, More Than Doubling Swedish Nicotine Pouch Share
Imperial Brands has agreed to acquire 100% of Swedish modern oral nicotine company Yoik Group AB for an initial SEK515 million, equivalent to about US$53.9 million, plus a deferred payment linked to performance over the next two years. Yoik owns nicotine pouch brand Helwit, which held about 3.4% of Sweden’s modern oral nicotine market over the past 12 months. Imperial says the acquisition will more than double its existing share of the Swedish market. Helwit is also sold elsewhere in the Nordics, through European online channels and in selected UK retail outlets.
Sep.08
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
A September online survey commissioned by Japanese smoking-accessories company Lightec found that 49.5% of respondents would consider reducing tobacco use if prices rose further, while 25.1% would consider switching to cheaper brands and 14.5% would consider using or combining alternatives such as vapes and nicotine-free herbal sticks. Another 64.6% expressed some level of interest in such alternatives. The survey covered 1,088 respondents aged 20 to 70 and was conducted by a company that sells NICOLESS nicotine-free vaping and herbal-stick products, meaning its findings should not be treated as representative of Japan's smoking population.
DATA
Oct.12
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26