Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.03.2024
Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers
According to Betterretailing, the Scottish government is planning to ban disposable e-cigarettes, with potential fines up to £10,000.

According to Betterretailing on April 2nd, the Scottish government is conducting a six-week public consultation on disposable e-cigarettes. The proposed regulations suggest that after the ban comes into effect on April 1, 2025, retailers selling disposable e-cigarettes may face fines of up to five levels, equivalent to £5,000 to £10,000.

 

This is different from England, where the first-time fine for a violation of the commercial practices law is 200 pounds. If the fine is paid within 28 days, the amount owed can be reduced to 100 pounds.

 

These regulations further clarify the definition of disposable e-cigarettes and set fines for businesses that continue to sell or supply disposable e-cigarettes after the ban is implemented. This ban is overseen by Scotland's independent regulatory authority and shares similarities with regulations in England.

 

The Scottish government has provided a detailed explanation of its definition of disposable e-cigarettes for the first time. According to this definition, disposable e-cigarettes are designed for single use only, with no option for refilling or replacing the disposable cartridge. Additionally, the battery and coil of disposable e-cigarettes cannot be replaced or recharged.

 

During the negotiations, a £30 million enforcement budget was mentioned, with the Scottish government stating that they will provide additional funding to HMRC and the Border Force to "support enforcement in Scotland.

 

ACS chief executive officer James Lowman stated:

 

The ban on disposable e-cigarettes will greatly impact black market dealers who sell illegal products to meet the demand of a quarter of e-cigarette users. We support the Scottish government's decision to heavily penalize these actions, but the £30 million execution budget seems insufficient for regulating all of the UK's customs, tax, and border departments.

 

If the UK government wants to support responsible retailers and remove illegal products from the streets, it needs to provide more local law enforcement funding and set harsh sanctions for those committing such crimes.

 

Simultaneously with the implementation of this consultation, crackdown on retailers not offering e-cigarette recycling services in stores has begun. In early 2024, e-cigarettes were removed from the WEEE distributor take-back scheme (phase 7), meaning any retailer selling any quantity of e-cigarettes will need to provide one-to-one recycling services.

 

In response to the issue, the ACS has provided relevant advice to help businesses provide recycling services.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

PMI reports full-year 2025 results with net revenues of $40.6 billion and smoke-free net revenues were about $16.9 billion
PMI reports full-year 2025 results with net revenues of $40.6 billion and smoke-free net revenues were about $16.9 billion
Philip Morris International (PMI) released its Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 6, 2026. PMI reported full-year net revenues of $40,648 million ($40.6 billion), reported diluted EPS of $7.26 and adjusted diluted EPS of $7.54. PMI said smoke-free net revenues were $16.9 billion and represented 41.5% of total net revenues, with smoke-free products available in 106 markets and over 43 million estimated adult consumers.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Research Summary | NHANES Study: Smoking or E-Cigarette Use Linked to Higher Prevalence of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension
Research Summary | NHANES Study: Smoking or E-Cigarette Use Linked to Higher Prevalence of Elevated Blood Pressure and Hypertension
A cross-sectional analysis based on the US NHANES 2021–2023 cycle, including 6,262 participants aged over 12, found that compared with people who neither smoke nor vape, those who smoke and/or use e-cigarettes had a higher prevalence of elevated blood pressure and hypertension. After full adjustment, smoking/vaping was associated with elevated blood pressure (aOR 1.34) and hypertension (aOR 1.46), and with a 1.05 mmHg higher diastolic blood pressure.
Feb.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
CBSA discloses seizure of 212,000 nicotine pouches at Pigeon River port of entry
CBSA discloses seizure of 212,000 nicotine pouches at Pigeon River port of entry
The Canada Border Services Agency said officers inspecting an incoming vehicle at the Pigeon River port of entry in June found 212,000 nicotine pouches and seized more than 29,000 Canadian dollars (about 21,170 U.S. dollars) in currency and cheques. A CBSA spokesperson disclosed the seizure this week in a Newswatch interview about enforcement operations over the past year.
Dec.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nicotine Becomes Second-Largest Revenue Source for Couche-Tard in Fiscal 2025
Nicotine Becomes Second-Largest Revenue Source for Couche-Tard in Fiscal 2025
Alimentation Couche-Tard reported that nicotine products accounted for 9% of total revenue in fiscal 2025, making it the company’s second-largest revenue source after fuel, according to its latest Business Strategy Update.
Market
Feb.19
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia proposes extending voluntary labeling pilot for reusable e-cigarettes to Aug. 31, 2026
Russia’s Ministry of Industry and Trade has proposed extending a voluntary labeling pilot covering reusable e-cigarettes and similar personal electric vaporizing devices until August 31, 2026. A draft government decree has been published on the unified portal for posting drafts of normative legal acts.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
A Seoul court has annulled South Korea’s health-levy assessments imposed on multiple importers of nicotine liquids used for vaping. While the court agreed the nicotine could be treated as “tobacco” because it was found to be leaf-derived, it ruled the levy—stacked with other taxes and calculated on a blunt, volume-only basis—was so severe it effectively deprived businesses of the ability to operate, breaching constitutional proportionality and equality standards.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai