Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.03.2024
Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers
According to Betterretailing, the Scottish government is planning to ban disposable e-cigarettes, with potential fines up to £10,000.

According to Betterretailing on April 2nd, the Scottish government is conducting a six-week public consultation on disposable e-cigarettes. The proposed regulations suggest that after the ban comes into effect on April 1, 2025, retailers selling disposable e-cigarettes may face fines of up to five levels, equivalent to £5,000 to £10,000.

 

This is different from England, where the first-time fine for a violation of the commercial practices law is 200 pounds. If the fine is paid within 28 days, the amount owed can be reduced to 100 pounds.

 

These regulations further clarify the definition of disposable e-cigarettes and set fines for businesses that continue to sell or supply disposable e-cigarettes after the ban is implemented. This ban is overseen by Scotland's independent regulatory authority and shares similarities with regulations in England.

 

The Scottish government has provided a detailed explanation of its definition of disposable e-cigarettes for the first time. According to this definition, disposable e-cigarettes are designed for single use only, with no option for refilling or replacing the disposable cartridge. Additionally, the battery and coil of disposable e-cigarettes cannot be replaced or recharged.

 

During the negotiations, a £30 million enforcement budget was mentioned, with the Scottish government stating that they will provide additional funding to HMRC and the Border Force to "support enforcement in Scotland.

 

ACS chief executive officer James Lowman stated:

 

The ban on disposable e-cigarettes will greatly impact black market dealers who sell illegal products to meet the demand of a quarter of e-cigarette users. We support the Scottish government's decision to heavily penalize these actions, but the £30 million execution budget seems insufficient for regulating all of the UK's customs, tax, and border departments.

 

If the UK government wants to support responsible retailers and remove illegal products from the streets, it needs to provide more local law enforcement funding and set harsh sanctions for those committing such crimes.

 

Simultaneously with the implementation of this consultation, crackdown on retailers not offering e-cigarette recycling services in stores has begun. In early 2024, e-cigarettes were removed from the WEEE distributor take-back scheme (phase 7), meaning any retailer selling any quantity of e-cigarettes will need to provide one-to-one recycling services.

 

In response to the issue, the ACS has provided relevant advice to help businesses provide recycling services.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
Canadian Court Allows Juul and Altria Vape Class Action to Move Forward Over Youth Marketing Claims
A Quebec Superior Court has allowed a class action lawsuit against Juul Labs and Altria Group related to vaping products to proceed, involving allegations concerning marketing practices, youth exposure and corporate responsibility. The ruling only allows the case to move forward and does not represent a finding that Juul or Altria are legally liable. The case highlights continued legal risks facing vape companies regarding product marketing, youth protection and corporate accountability.
Jul.28
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17
UK Reform Party Proposes Cap of 1,000 Vape Shops Under Plan to Tighten Retail Controls
UK Reform Party Proposes Cap of 1,000 Vape Shops Under Plan to Tighten Retail Controls
The UK Reform Party has proposed limiting the number of dedicated vape shops in the country to around 1,000 as part of a plan to tighten oversight of vape retail channels. The proposal was put forward by Reform UK deputy leader and MP Lee Anderson. The plan remains a political proposal and has not become UK government policy, with no detailed legislation, implementation timeline or allocation rules announced.
Aug.10
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australia’s Tobacco Tax Debate Intensifies as One Nation’s Barnaby Joyce Warns of Illicit Market Growth
Australian One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce has criticised continued tobacco excise increases, arguing that higher taxes are driving consumers toward illicit tobacco markets and benefiting organised crime groups.
Regulations
Jul.13 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law introducing mandatory licensing for wholesale and retail trade in tobacco and nicotine-containing products, with the system taking effect on October 1, 2026, and unlicensed operations banned from March 1, 2027, while vape and e-liquid retail may also face uncertainty from temporary regional sales-ban powers.
Jul.01
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06