Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.03.2024
Scottish Government Considers Five-Figure Fine for Disposable E-cigarette Retailers
According to Betterretailing, the Scottish government is planning to ban disposable e-cigarettes, with potential fines up to £10,000.

According to Betterretailing on April 2nd, the Scottish government is conducting a six-week public consultation on disposable e-cigarettes. The proposed regulations suggest that after the ban comes into effect on April 1, 2025, retailers selling disposable e-cigarettes may face fines of up to five levels, equivalent to £5,000 to £10,000.

 

This is different from England, where the first-time fine for a violation of the commercial practices law is 200 pounds. If the fine is paid within 28 days, the amount owed can be reduced to 100 pounds.

 

These regulations further clarify the definition of disposable e-cigarettes and set fines for businesses that continue to sell or supply disposable e-cigarettes after the ban is implemented. This ban is overseen by Scotland's independent regulatory authority and shares similarities with regulations in England.

 

The Scottish government has provided a detailed explanation of its definition of disposable e-cigarettes for the first time. According to this definition, disposable e-cigarettes are designed for single use only, with no option for refilling or replacing the disposable cartridge. Additionally, the battery and coil of disposable e-cigarettes cannot be replaced or recharged.

 

During the negotiations, a £30 million enforcement budget was mentioned, with the Scottish government stating that they will provide additional funding to HMRC and the Border Force to "support enforcement in Scotland.

 

ACS chief executive officer James Lowman stated:

 

The ban on disposable e-cigarettes will greatly impact black market dealers who sell illegal products to meet the demand of a quarter of e-cigarette users. We support the Scottish government's decision to heavily penalize these actions, but the £30 million execution budget seems insufficient for regulating all of the UK's customs, tax, and border departments.

 

If the UK government wants to support responsible retailers and remove illegal products from the streets, it needs to provide more local law enforcement funding and set harsh sanctions for those committing such crimes.

 

Simultaneously with the implementation of this consultation, crackdown on retailers not offering e-cigarette recycling services in stores has begun. In early 2024, e-cigarettes were removed from the WEEE distributor take-back scheme (phase 7), meaning any retailer selling any quantity of e-cigarettes will need to provide one-to-one recycling services.

 

In response to the issue, the ACS has provided relevant advice to help businesses provide recycling services.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Alabama SB9 would treat vaping like smoking under indoor public-space restrictions
Alabama SB9 would treat vaping like smoking under indoor public-space restrictions
Alabama’s Senate Bill 9 would modernize the state’s indoor air quality laws by treating electronic nicotine delivery systems, including e-cigarettes and vape pens, the same as traditional tobacco smoking in indoor public spaces. Sponsored by Sen.
Jan.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Costa Rica Ruling Party Lawmaker Proposes Vape Ban as Experts Warn of Black Market Risks
Costa Rica Ruling Party Lawmaker Proposes Vape Ban as Experts Warn of Black Market Risks
A lawmaker from Costa Rica’s ruling party has introduced a bill to completely ban e-cigarettes and related products, covering their import, sale, use, and manufacturing, citing rising youth use and associated health risks. The proposal would repeal the current regulatory law and has raised concerns that a full ban, combined with weak enforcement, could fuel a black market.
Dec.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exclusive: Altria Confirms FDA Grants Marketing Authorization to on! PLUS, Ending More Than a Year of PMTA Review
Exclusive: Altria Confirms FDA Grants Marketing Authorization to on! PLUS, Ending More Than a Year of PMTA Review
Altria on December 19 confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products had received U.S. FDA marketing authorization, ending a PMTA review lasting more than a year after the company moved ahead with launch plans before clearance.
Regulations
Dec.20
Washington Policy Media Flags Surge: China’s Monthly Vape Exports Jump from 2.2M Kg to 14.8M Kg; Crackdown Effectiveness Questioned
Washington Policy Media Flags Surge: China’s Monthly Vape Exports Jump from 2.2M Kg to 14.8M Kg; Crackdown Effectiveness Questioned
The Washington Examiner on December 9, 2025, reported: China's vape export volume to the U.S. rebounded sharply from 2.2 million kilograms to 14.8 million kilograms despite the crackdown. This volatility, confirming the annual multi-billion dollar trade gap, is the "Bullwhip Effect" in action. It transfers massive inventory to the U.S. market, putting the working capital of Chinese manufacturers and the supply chain at severe risk of lock-up and failure. Regulatory escalation is now imminent.
News
Dec.11
U.S. Washington State to Bring Synthetic Nicotine Under the Tobacco Tax System, Applying a Unified Tax Starting January 2026
U.S. Washington State to Bring Synthetic Nicotine Under the Tobacco Tax System, Applying a Unified Tax Starting January 2026
Washington State will subject all nicotine-containing products to the Tobacco Products Tax starting January 1, 2026, taxing them at 95% of the selling price. The change covers both tobacco-derived and synthetic nicotine products and requires businesses to report their inventory when the new tax system takes effect.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai