S. Korean Court Nears Final Ruling on $35M Claim Against PMI, BAT, KT&G

Apr.23.2025
S. Korean Court Nears Final Ruling on $35M Claim Against PMI, BAT, KT&G
South Korea’s National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) filed a lawsuit seeking about 50 billion won (approximately USD 35 million) in damages against Korea Tobacco & Ginseng (KT&G), Philip Morris International Korea, and British American Tobacco Korea, arguing that these companies should reimburse the treatment costs for patients with smoking-related cancers . Originally lodged in April 2014, the case has spanned 11 years and has now entered the final oral-argument phase at the appellate level.

Key points:

Background and scale of the case: The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) of South Korea has filed a lawsuit since 2014 against KT&G, Philip Morris International (PMI) Korea (Philip Morris Korea), British American Tobacco Korea (BAT Korea), and others, seeking compensation of 533 billion Korean won (approximately 38 million US dollars). The reason for the lawsuit is that NHIS has paid for treatment expenses for patients suffering from smoking-related cancers.

 

First instance and second instance results: The first instance court found it difficult to confirm a direct causal relationship between smoking and cancer, supporting the tobacco company's position. In the second instance, the healthcare organization presented testimonies from an 86-year-old patient, asserting that there were no other contributing factors to their cancer besides a long history of smoking, in an attempt to strengthen the causal relationship.

 

Controversy over ingredients and court ruling: The first trial also involved a dispute over the responsibility of tar and nicotine in tobacco. The court believed that nicotine is a core attribute of tobacco products and cannot be used as a basis for establishing liability for infringement.


According to N. News, the South Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) has entered the final stage of a lawsuit seeking approximately 500 billion Korean won (approximately 35 million US dollars) in compensation from multiple tobacco companies. The Chief Judge of the Civil 6-1 Division of the Seoul High Court will hold a final round of debates on May 22, after which the date for the ruling on the case will be determined.

 

The case has been ongoing for 11 years since it was filed in April 2014. NHIS is seeking a claim of approximately 533 billion Korean won from KT&G, Philip Morris International (PMI) Korea, and British American Tobacco Korea to reimburse the medical expenses paid by the organization from 2003 to 2013 for 3,465 patients with lung cancer (small cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma) and throat cancer (squamous cell carcinoma).

 

The central dispute of the lawsuit focuses on the causal relationship between smoking and the development of cancer, as well as whether tobacco companies should be held legally responsible for this.

 

In November 2020, the Seoul Central District Court ruled in the first instance that it is difficult to establish a direct causal relationship between smoking and cancer, therefore rejecting all claims of NHIS. The court believed that cancer may be caused by genetics, lifestyle, or other environmental factors. In the first instance, NHIS also argued that tobacco companies did not effectively reduce tar and nicotine levels, but instead added flavor enhancers to enhance the taste. However, the court considered that consumers actively seek the pharmacological sedative effects of nicotine, so this component is inherent to tobacco products and it is difficult to hold tobacco companies accountable for it.

 

NHIS subsequently filed an appeal in December of the same year. In the second trial, NHIS submitted a statement from lung cancer patient A, who is over 80 years old, as additional evidence, attempting to prove that A's lung cancer had no other obvious causes besides smoking. The statement pointed out that A had been smoking for decades since his twenties, although he quit smoking in the late 1990s, he was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2010, and had no relevant family medical history.

 

Currently, South Korean judicial authorities tend to attribute the responsibility for diseases caused by smoking to individuals. In 2014, the South Korean Supreme Court ruled in a similar lawsuit filed by 30 patients against KT&G that smokers must bear the health consequences themselves and did not support their compensation claim.

 

In 1998, the government of all 50 states in the United States jointly filed a lawsuit against tobacco companies including Philip Morris International (PMI) and Reynolds Tobacco, eventually reaching a $246 billion settlement agreement. This result was partially influenced by the "Tobacco Industry Documents," released by internal researchers in 1994, prompting the public to reassess the addictive nature and harm of tobacco products.

 

NHIS believes that this lawsuit is not only legally significant but also helps to raise public awareness on smoking cessation. NHIS is currently promoting a "1 million national support signature campaign" in order to create public opinion support for the upcoming second trial judgment.

 

The tobacco company, on the other hand, stated that they will participate in the second appeal process "honestly".

 

It is reported that the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) of Korea is a national public institution under the Ministry of Health and Welfare, responsible for the nationwide operation and management of health insurance. Its main duties include providing medical insurance services to the public, collecting insurance premiums, and overseeing settlements with medical institutions.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
The House-passed FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act includes a provision authorizing the defense secretary to conduct a one-year smoking-cessation pilot for active-duty service members. Section 707 lists counseling, nicotine gum and patches alongside what the bill calls "electric nicotine delivery systems," nicotine pouches and heat-not-burn products. A recent Washington Examiner op-ed cited ZYN as an example in arguing for the provision, but the legislation does not name any commercial brand or supplier. ZYN is made by PMI-owned Swedish Match USA, with specified products holding FDA marketing authorizations and modified risk orders.
Sep.20
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Imperial Brands' acquisition of Swedish Helwit owner Yoik Group AB has highlighted the professional-services firms supporting cross-border oral nicotine M&A. Latham & Watkins and KPMG advised Imperial, while PwC and TM & Partners advised Yoik. KPMG also appeared on Imperial's acquisition of Black Buffalo earlier in 2026, while PwC played an extensive role in KT&G's acquisition of Swedish nicotine-pouch company Another Snus Factory. Imperial's public disclosures put the global modern oral nicotine delivery market at approximately £8.8 billion in retail sales and 23.5 billion pouches in 2024
Sep.20
JTI’s Nordic Spirit Signs Co-op Live Partnership Ahead of New UK Nicotine Sponsorship Restrictions
JTI’s Nordic Spirit Signs Co-op Live Partnership Ahead of New UK Nicotine Sponsorship Restrictions
JTI nicotine pouch brand Nordic Spirit has entered a long-term partnership with Manchester’s Co-op Live, becoming the venue’s Official Nicotine Pouch Partner. The 23,500-capacity venue is the UK’s largest indoor live entertainment arena. Nordic Spirit will run in-venue activations for existing adult nicotine consumers and sell products at selected arena bars. The agreement was entered into before the relevant UK sponsorship restrictions were introduced, while the government intends to implement a comprehensive ban on advertising and sponsorship of vaping and nicotine products from June 1, 2027.
Sep.07
Imperial Brands Plans Thousands of Job Cuts Across U.S. and Europe in Cost Restructuring
Imperial Brands Plans Thousands of Job Cuts Across U.S. and Europe in Cost Restructuring
According to Reuters, citing Bloomberg News, British tobacco company Imperial Brands PLC plans to cut thousands of jobs across the United States and Europe as part of a cost reduction and organizational restructuring effort. The announcement drew market attention to the company’s shares. The move comes as global tobacco companies continue adjusting their operations amid slower cigarette market growth, changing consumer preferences and the transition toward next-generation nicotine products.
Aug.11
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia’s tobacco excise debate is increasingly exposing differences within the governing Labor Party. New South Wales Labor Premier Chris Minns reaffirmed on September 8 that he supports reducing tobacco excise, arguing that current tax settings are pushing consumers toward cheaper black-market cigarettes. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler continues to oppose an excise cut, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino have recently stopped short of ruling out future changes. The divergence follows the opposition Coalition’s proposal to cut tobacco excise by 80%.
Sep.08
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Capital is reassessing the global tobacco and modern nicotine industry as heated tobacco, vaping and nicotine pouches reshape demand, profitability and regulation. At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, investors and analysts examined whether smoke-free growth can sustain earnings, how regulation shapes startup value, and whether shareholder engagement can be more effective than divestment. The debate points to a broader shift: tobacco transition is increasingly becoming a capital-allocation, governance and valuation question.
Capital Markets
Oct.05