Texas County Settles Lawsuit Against JUUL for $20 Million

Mar.23.2023
Texas County Settles Lawsuit Against JUUL for $20 Million
JUUL settles with Harris County for $20 million for marketing e-cigarettes to minors.

On March 22nd, Harris County in the state of Texas (hereinafter referred to as "Texas") announced that it had resolved its lawsuit with the e-cigarette company JUUL and would receive a settlement of $20 million.


According to reports, the county is the first government entity in Texas to file a lawsuit against JUUL in 2021. Harris County prosecutor Christian Menefee said that the county is accusing JUUL of marketing its electronic cigarettes to minors.


As the largest county in the state and the third largest in the country, we are very proud to be able to take a leadership role," he said.


JUUL gained notoriety for offering a variety of popular e-cigarette flavors, and the local settlement is part of a larger global settlement with JUUL. The total amount of the settlement in Texas is $42.8 million.


Menifee stated that the case was always about reducing nicotine addiction among youth in the community. "The settlement funds are intended to alleviate the impact of nicotine addiction among our young people, and we want to protect them.


In 2022, a study released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) revealed that nearly half of the surveyed students had used e-cigarettes for 20 days or more in the past 30 days. Admission statistics from UT Health showed that 1 in 5 children in Houston had tried using e-cigarette products.


Harris County commissioners will decide how to use funds from reconciliation.


Further reading:


JUUL has spent $18.2 billion in search of a settlement. Here's a breakdown of the amounts and conditions of settlements reached with various states.


Orange County in the United States will purchase electronic cigarette detectors following Juul's payment of a $5.4 million settlement.


References:


Harris County has reached a settlement in a lawsuit against JUUL Labs, alleging that the vaping company engaged in deceptive marketing tactics aimed at children.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
A report by KFF Health News says that as the Trump administration pursued a series of policies favorable to the nicotine and tobacco industry, President Donald Trump increased his holdings in tobacco companies while benefiting from substantial industry-linked political donations, prompting questions from public health advocates about potential conflicts of interest and regulatory direction.
Jun.12
LOST MARY Launches VIZ With Transparent Wraparound Pod and LED Display
LOST MARY Launches VIZ With Transparent Wraparound Pod and LED Display
LOST MARY announced VIZ on May 6, 2026, describing it as the brand’s first product with a transparent 360-degree wraparound pod.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Moscow Police Seize About 65,000 E-Cigarettes Worth More Than RUB 30 Million
Moscow Police Seize About 65,000 E-Cigarettes Worth More Than RUB 30 Million
Russian Interior Ministry spokesperson Irina Volk said on May 6 that police in Moscow seized about 65,000 nicotine-containing products from a man during searches of residential and warehouse premises. The products were valued at about RUB 30 million, or about USD 395,727 based on an exchange rate of USD 1 = RUB 75.81.
May.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Japan Tobacco Q1 2026 Financial Results: Revenue at $5.914 Billion,RRP Revenue Up 63.8% YoY
Japan Tobacco Q1 2026 Financial Results: Revenue at $5.914 Billion,RRP Revenue Up 63.8% YoY
Japanese Tobacco (JT) reports Q1 2026 revenue of 924 billion yen, a 15.2% increase; operating profit rises 24.7%.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France Vape Market 2026: Use Reaches 7.9% Amid Tax, Regulatory and Scientific Debate
France remains one of Europe’s active vape markets in 2026, with adult vaping prevalence rising to 7.9%; at the same time, e-liquid taxation, public-space restrictions, advertising compliance and health-risk debate are pushing the industry into a critical policy period.
Jun.23