US Tobacco Companies Challenge California Flavored Tobacco Ban

Nov.30.2022
US Tobacco Companies Challenge California Flavored Tobacco Ban
Tobacco companies challenge California's ban on flavored tobacco products in the US Supreme Court.

On November 29th, tobacco company R.J. Reynolds, also known as Reynold Tobacco Holdings, joined other tobacco companies in a joint request to the United States Supreme Court. They requested an emergency order to block California's ban on flavored tobacco products.


Two years ago, the ban was initially passed by the state legislature, but it never went into effect after tobacco companies collected a significant number of "no" votes. However, nearly two-thirds of voters approved the prohibition of selling electronic cigarette products, and the law will take effect on December 21st.


Supporters of the ban state that this law is necessary to curb the increasing number of young people who smoke.


A study has found that one in six high school students in the United States use e-cigarettes or tobacco products.


Renault filed a federal lawsuit and raised objections to it, but the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Renault's emergency motion.


Tobacco giants argue that the authority to ban flavors belongs to federal law. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act grants the Food and Drug Administration the power to regulate tobacco. These companies are represented by Noel Francisco, who previously served as the top lawyer for the Trump administration at the Supreme Court.


California will become the second state in the United States to implement a ban on the sale of all flavored tobacco products, following in the footsteps of Massachusetts. Several cities in California, including Los Angeles and San Diego, have already implemented their own bans, and a few states have prohibited the sale of flavored electronic cigarette products.


2FIRSTS will continue to provide ongoing coverage of this issue, with updates available on the 2FIRSTS app. Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Washington State to Bring Synthetic Nicotine Under the Tobacco Tax System, Applying a Unified Tax Starting January 2026
U.S. Washington State to Bring Synthetic Nicotine Under the Tobacco Tax System, Applying a Unified Tax Starting January 2026
Washington State will subject all nicotine-containing products to the Tobacco Products Tax starting January 1, 2026, taxing them at 95% of the selling price. The change covers both tobacco-derived and synthetic nicotine products and requires businesses to report their inventory when the new tax system takes effect.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
In Nepal’s Mustang district, authorities seized 80 cartons of e-cigarettes valued at NPR 22,459,320 (approximately US$150,000) in Lomanthang Rural Municipality-4, Nechung, and detained a 32-year-old man, Pema Lama. The account says the e-cigarettes were allegedly brought illegally from China three to four days earlier and loaded near the Korala Nepal–China border point before being intercepted.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Tennessee’s “Tobacco Product Retail Licensing Act” Would Require New Licenses for Tobacco and Vapes
Tennessee’s “Tobacco Product Retail Licensing Act” Would Require New Licenses for Tobacco and Vapes
A newly introduced Tennessee bill, S.B. 2086, would create a statewide tobacco product retail licensing system, move oversight to the Tennessee Alcohol Commission, and impose fees and escalating penalties. The proposal also requires all tobacco product sales to occur as in-person, over-the-counter transactions at licensed locations—effectively banning direct-to-consumer shipping of cigars and potentially restricting curbside or phone-order pickup models.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alabama SB9 advances: Senate committee clears bill to treat vaping like smoking in enclosed public places
Alabama SB9 advances: Senate committee clears bill to treat vaping like smoking in enclosed public places
Alabama’s Senate Bill 9 advanced after clearing the Senate Committee on Healthcare, moving to the full Alabama Senate for consideration. The proposal would update the state’s 2003 Clean Indoor Air Act by including e-cigarettes and other vaping devices under the same restrictions that apply to smoking in most enclosed public places.
Jan.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Spain’s Competition Authority Questions Disposable Vape Ban
Spain’s Competition Authority Questions Disposable Vape Ban
Spain’s National Commission on Markets and Competition (CNMC) has issued an opinion on the draft reform of the Tobacco Law proposed by the Ministry of Health, urging reconsideration of several measures. These include a proposed ban on disposable e-cigarettes and the full alignment of vaping products with traditional tobacco regulation.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai