Baltimore Sues Tobacco Companies Over Cigarette Litter Costs

Nov.23.2022
Baltimore Sues Tobacco Companies Over Cigarette Litter Costs
Baltimore city sues major tobacco companies for not properly disposing of cigarette waste. $5 million annually requested.

The city of Baltimore is suing several major tobacco companies, demanding up to $5 million per year to fund the cleaning of cigarette butt litter.


City government officials stated that over 12 million cigarette butts have been cleaned up from the waters surrounding Baltimore since 2014.


James Shea, a lawyer in Baltimore, stated that there are various cleaning issues, ranging from picking up cigarette butts to removing the chemicals they leave behind.


The lawsuit alleges that tobacco companies have refused to place warning labels on packaging on how to properly dispose of cigarette filters, and have chosen not to make filters biodegradable.


Shea said that based on the documents they have seen, the company did not switch to biodegradable filters because smokers prefer the suction devices that come with the filters.


Shea stated that the ultimate goal is to make these companies more environmentally friendly. "We hope to put an end to these practices, but at the same time, we want compensation for the costs of cleanup and fines related to violating various waste regulations." These companies have 30 days to respond in court.


Announcement:


This article has been compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry discussion and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's content. This article's compilation is solely intended for internal industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The compilation of information belongs to the original media and author, and if there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

JUUL Files ITC Complaint over Vaporizer Device Infringement
JUUL Files ITC Complaint over Vaporizer Device Infringement
The U.S. International Trade Commission has instituted a Section 337 investigation following a complaint filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. and VMR Products LLC. The complaint alleges that certain vaporizer devices, cartridges and related components infringe two U.S. patents. The investigation covers importation, sale for importation and post-importation sales in the United States, with the complainants seeking a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
Dec.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT Subsidiary Warns of Surge in Illegal Nicotine Pouches in Canada, Calls for Unified Regulatory Framework
BAT Subsidiary Warns of Surge in Illegal Nicotine Pouches in Canada, Calls for Unified Regulatory Framework
Imperial Tobacco Canada, a subsidiary of British American Tobacco, has urged the federal government to respond to the spread of illegal nicotine pouches by allowing approved products to be sold through a wider range of adult retail channels. The company is also calling for stronger retail inspections, enhanced digital tracking, and closer coordination among provinces to build a consistent regulatory framework and restore the accessibility of the legal market.
Dec.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangkok Police Bust Illegal E-Cigarette Warehouse, Seize Vapes Worth Over $112,000
Bangkok Police Bust Illegal E-Cigarette Warehouse, Seize Vapes Worth Over $112,000
Thai police raided an illegal e-cigarette warehouse, arrested a man accused of selling vapes online, and seized a large quantity of improperly imported products worth more than 4 million baht (about $112,000).
Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thailand’s health minister rejects vaping as a smoking cessation alternative
Thailand’s health minister rejects vaping as a smoking cessation alternative
Thailand’s Public Health Minister Phatthana Phromphat has reaffirmed that the government does not support cigarettes or e-cigarettes in any form and opposes the use of e-cigarettes as a substitute for smoking cessation.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exclusive | China Releases E-Cigarette Regulatory “Status Report”, First Comprehensive Disclosure of Oversight Framework and International Cooperation
Exclusive | China Releases E-Cigarette Regulatory “Status Report”, First Comprehensive Disclosure of Oversight Framework and International Cooperation
As 2025 draws to a close, China’s State Tobacco Monopoly Administration has released a white paper–style “Status Report” on e-cigarette regulation, systematically outlining its oversight framework, enforcement outcomes and international cooperation. 2Firsts provides exclusive in-depth reporting and analysis, offering insight into China’s regulatory logic and governance direction.
Dec.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Two Taunton Shops Closed After Seizure of Illegal Tobacco and Vapes
Two Taunton Shops Closed After Seizure of Illegal Tobacco and Vapes
Two shops in Taunton have been ordered to close for three months after authorities found illegal tobacco and vape products worth around £50,000. The seizures followed joint operations involving Trading Standards officers, police and tobacco detection dogs. Magistrates ruled that closing the premises was necessary to prevent further criminal activity.
Dec.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai