California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products

Nov.10.2022
California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
California voters support a law to end the sale of flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and flavored cigars.

Californians have voted in support of a state government law to end the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars.


On November 9th, Proposition 31, which upholds the law, was leading with a 65% to 35% advantage. According to the Associated Press, official results will take more time to be confirmed. The state mailed ballots to all active voters and ballots postmarked on Election Day have a week to arrive.


In 2020, California lawmakers passed a ban prohibiting all flavored nicotine products except for hookah, loose-leaf tobacco (used for pipes), and premium cigars. Mint-flavored products are also included in the legislation.


The Proposition 31 is the antidote to the candy-flavored poison that big tobacco companies sell to our children and communities of color in California," said Jerry Hill, the author of the original bill that became Proposition 31 and former senator. "With the implementation of Proposition 31, there is now a strong defense against tobacco companies' ability to lure children into smoking and a lifelong addiction to nicotine; Californians will live longer and healthier because of this.


Opponents of the ban collected over a million signatures, forcing the state to hold a referendum on the issue. The legislation, originally slated to take effect on January 1, 2021, was subsequently suspended until the vote on November 8.


Advocates of Proposal 31 argue that these restrictions will prevent children from using tobacco by eliminating flavors such as bubblegum, cotton candy, and cherry that are popular among young people.


Opponents argue that the ban will eliminate electronic nicotine delivery systems, which they see as an effective tool in the effort to quit traditional smoking, and unfairly target certain communities. For instance, black smokers are more likely to use menthol cigarettes.


Supporters of the ban had a significant lead over opponents prior to the vote. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, as of mid-October, billionaire anti-smoking and anti-vaping activist Michael Bloomberg had contributed $15.3 million of the $17.3 million raised by the committee supporting the ban. In contrast, opponents had raised just over $2 million, with nearly all of it coming from donations by Philip Morris USA ($1.2 million) and R.J. Reynolds ($743,000).


California, along with Massachusetts and Washington D.C., has banned the sale of flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars. Three other states - New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island - have also banned the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. With local laws included, 25% of the U.S. population is now covered by laws ending the sale of flavored e-cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of its contents. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry-related research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accurate information.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government's stances and statements on domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and international matters.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to have it removed.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania has opened IQOS Boutique Victoriei in Bucharest, expanding the country’s IQOS retail network to 120 points of sale and advancing a Retail 2.0 concept that combines design, technology, interactive art and urban culture.
PMI
Jul.13
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
DOJ Trade Fraud Task Force Tops $1 Billion in Cases, Putting Vape Supply Chains at Risk of Fraud Enforcement
DOJ Trade Fraud Task Force Tops $1 Billion in Cases, Putting Vape Supply Chains at Risk of Fraud Enforcement
According to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Fox News and other reports, the DOJ’s Trade Fraud Task Force (TFTF) has been linked to more than $1 billion in recoveries, penalties, forfeitures and publicly charged losses in less than one year. The task force focuses on trade fraud issues including country-of-origin fraud, illegal transshipment, false declarations and tariff evasion. While vape products are not the main source of the $1 billion figure, the industry’s reliance on global manufacturing and cross-border supply chains places it within broader U.S. trade enforcement scrutiny. The development suggests that U.S. oversight of cross-border vape products may increasingly extend beyond product authorization into import compliance, supply-chain transparency and corporate accountability.
Jul.23
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
A new Indiana law restricting the sale of foreign-made vape products has taken effect, requiring retailers to adjust inventory and sourcing practices. According to The Sun, WDRB and other reports, some local vape shops are reviewing product origins and supplier information to comply with the new requirements. The measure represents a broader shift in U.S. vape regulation, with oversight expanding beyond product authorization and sales rules toward manufacturing origin and supply-chain management.
Jul.24
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
South Korean Lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook Pushes Synthetic Nicotine Vape Probe, Highlighting Supply Chain and Tax Concerns
South Korean Lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook Pushes Synthetic Nicotine Vape Probe, Highlighting Supply Chain and Tax Concerns
South Korean lawmaker Jeong Jin-wook has again called for stronger government action against liquid synthetic nicotine vape manufacturers and sellers, alleging that some businesses may have avoided regulation through product labeling changes and corporate restructuring. According to Newsworks, JNILBO and other Korean reports, Jeong has held his third press conference on the issue, calling for a government-wide investigation. The dispute involves whether synthetic nicotine products should fall under tobacco regulations, tax implications and supply-chain transparency. South Korean government agencies have previously said some estimates of potential tax losses cannot be verified due to limited sales data.
Jul.27