California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products

Nov.10.2022
California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
California voters support a law to end the sale of flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and flavored cigars.

Californians have voted in support of a state government law to end the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars.


On November 9th, Proposition 31, which upholds the law, was leading with a 65% to 35% advantage. According to the Associated Press, official results will take more time to be confirmed. The state mailed ballots to all active voters and ballots postmarked on Election Day have a week to arrive.


In 2020, California lawmakers passed a ban prohibiting all flavored nicotine products except for hookah, loose-leaf tobacco (used for pipes), and premium cigars. Mint-flavored products are also included in the legislation.


The Proposition 31 is the antidote to the candy-flavored poison that big tobacco companies sell to our children and communities of color in California," said Jerry Hill, the author of the original bill that became Proposition 31 and former senator. "With the implementation of Proposition 31, there is now a strong defense against tobacco companies' ability to lure children into smoking and a lifelong addiction to nicotine; Californians will live longer and healthier because of this.


Opponents of the ban collected over a million signatures, forcing the state to hold a referendum on the issue. The legislation, originally slated to take effect on January 1, 2021, was subsequently suspended until the vote on November 8.


Advocates of Proposal 31 argue that these restrictions will prevent children from using tobacco by eliminating flavors such as bubblegum, cotton candy, and cherry that are popular among young people.


Opponents argue that the ban will eliminate electronic nicotine delivery systems, which they see as an effective tool in the effort to quit traditional smoking, and unfairly target certain communities. For instance, black smokers are more likely to use menthol cigarettes.


Supporters of the ban had a significant lead over opponents prior to the vote. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, as of mid-October, billionaire anti-smoking and anti-vaping activist Michael Bloomberg had contributed $15.3 million of the $17.3 million raised by the committee supporting the ban. In contrast, opponents had raised just over $2 million, with nearly all of it coming from donations by Philip Morris USA ($1.2 million) and R.J. Reynolds ($743,000).


California, along with Massachusetts and Washington D.C., has banned the sale of flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars. Three other states - New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island - have also banned the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. With local laws included, 25% of the U.S. population is now covered by laws ending the sale of flavored e-cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of its contents. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry-related research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accurate information.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government's stances and statements on domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and international matters.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to have it removed.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Product | Philip Morris Korea Launches TEREA Limona Pearl, Expanding Fresh Blend Capsule Lineup to Five
Philip Morris Korea launched TEREA Limona Pearl in South Korea on August 31, 2026, expanding the TEREA Fresh Blend capsule tobacco stick lineup from four variants to five. Designed for the IQOS ILUMA series, the new stick combines a capsule with what the company calls a Fresh Filter. Philip Morris Korea describes the product as offering an aromatic, refreshing flavor profile with a cooling sensation, with an additional fresh note released when the capsule is crushed. The recommended retail price is KRW 4,800 per pack, with sales through IQOS stores and convenience stores nationwide. No reliable evidence has been found that the same Limona Pearl SKU was previously officially launched in another major IQOS market.
Sep.01
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
Russian Strikes Destroy JTI and Imperial Brands Ukraine Warehouses, With Losses Reaching Tens of Millions of Hryvnias
According to Ukrainska Pravda, Russian strikes on the Kyiv region during the night of Aug. 4-5, 2026, damaged warehouses storing products of Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and Imperial Brands Ukraine. JTI said a finished goods warehouse in Kyiv Oblast was destroyed, with no employees injured, and that it did not expect disruptions to retail supplies. Imperial Brands Ukraine said products stored at warehouses of distributors and retail partners were affected and estimated losses from the strikes at “tens of millions of Ukrainian hryvnias” (roughly hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars).
JTI
Aug.07
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
Indiana’s Foreign-Made Vape Ban Takes Effect, Forcing Brands and Retailers to Adjust Supply Chains
A new Indiana law restricting the sale of foreign-made vape products has taken effect, requiring retailers to adjust inventory and sourcing practices. According to The Sun, WDRB and other reports, some local vape shops are reviewing product origins and supplier information to comply with the new requirements. The measure represents a broader shift in U.S. vape regulation, with oversight expanding beyond product authorization and sales rules toward manufacturing origin and supply-chain management.
Jul.24
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
According to Swiss media outlet Blick, local authorities are strengthening compliance checks on vape products, nicotine pouches and other tobacco-related products following the implementation of Switzerland’s revised Tobacco Products Act. A Basel laboratory tested 32 disposable vapes and e-liquids, with only three meeting regulatory requirements and 21 products banned from sale. Swiss authorities are also expanding retail inspections, laboratory testing and youth purchase checks to enforce the new tobacco and nicotine product rules.
Aug.12