California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products

Nov.10.2022
California Votes to Ban Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
California voters support a law to end the sale of flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and flavored cigars.

Californians have voted in support of a state government law to end the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars.


On November 9th, Proposition 31, which upholds the law, was leading with a 65% to 35% advantage. According to the Associated Press, official results will take more time to be confirmed. The state mailed ballots to all active voters and ballots postmarked on Election Day have a week to arrive.


In 2020, California lawmakers passed a ban prohibiting all flavored nicotine products except for hookah, loose-leaf tobacco (used for pipes), and premium cigars. Mint-flavored products are also included in the legislation.


The Proposition 31 is the antidote to the candy-flavored poison that big tobacco companies sell to our children and communities of color in California," said Jerry Hill, the author of the original bill that became Proposition 31 and former senator. "With the implementation of Proposition 31, there is now a strong defense against tobacco companies' ability to lure children into smoking and a lifelong addiction to nicotine; Californians will live longer and healthier because of this.


Opponents of the ban collected over a million signatures, forcing the state to hold a referendum on the issue. The legislation, originally slated to take effect on January 1, 2021, was subsequently suspended until the vote on November 8.


Advocates of Proposal 31 argue that these restrictions will prevent children from using tobacco by eliminating flavors such as bubblegum, cotton candy, and cherry that are popular among young people.


Opponents argue that the ban will eliminate electronic nicotine delivery systems, which they see as an effective tool in the effort to quit traditional smoking, and unfairly target certain communities. For instance, black smokers are more likely to use menthol cigarettes.


Supporters of the ban had a significant lead over opponents prior to the vote. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, as of mid-October, billionaire anti-smoking and anti-vaping activist Michael Bloomberg had contributed $15.3 million of the $17.3 million raised by the committee supporting the ban. In contrast, opponents had raised just over $2 million, with nearly all of it coming from donations by Philip Morris USA ($1.2 million) and R.J. Reynolds ($743,000).


California, along with Massachusetts and Washington D.C., has banned the sale of flavored tobacco products, including flavored e-cigarettes, menthol cigarettes, and flavored cigars. Three other states - New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island - have also banned the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. With local laws included, 25% of the U.S. population is now covered by laws ending the sale of flavored e-cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of its contents. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry-related research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accurate information.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government's stances and statements on domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and international matters.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to have it removed.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
Sesh touts independence, 8VC backing and retail reach as it challenges tobacco-owned pouch brands
U.S. nicotine pouch brand Sesh has emphasized its independence from Altria, Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco, along with backing from investors including 8VC, celebrity supporters and a retail footprint of more than 7,500 stores, as it seeks to differentiate itself in a market where major pouch brands are owned by large tobacco companies.
Regulations
Jul.07 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Product | IVG Pro 15K Enters European Retail Channels, Expanding High-Capacity Pod System Segment
Product | IVG Pro 15K Enters European Retail Channels, Expanding High-Capacity Pod System Segment
UK vape brand IVG has introduced the IVG Pro 15K, a high-capacity pod system combining a 2ml prefilled pod with a 10ml refill container to deliver up to 15,000 puffs. Unlike conventional high-puff disposable vapes, the IVG Pro 15K adopts a reusable device structure, reflecting a broader shift in the European vape market toward longer-use-cycle products and reusable hardware ecosystems.
Jul.14
Germany Expands Take-Back Rules for Disposable Vapes From July 1
Germany Expands Take-Back Rules for Disposable Vapes From July 1
Germany has expanded take-back obligations for disposable vapes from July 1, 2026, requiring consumers to be able to return used devices at stores that sell such products, including kiosks, petrol stations and vape shops, as e-cigarette regulation extends from sales to waste management and lithium-battery safety.
Market
Jul.06 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Local Council Proposes £5 Refundable Deposit on Vape Devices
UK Local Council Proposes £5 Refundable Deposit on Vape Devices
Norwich City Council is set to debate a proposed vape deposit scheme that would require consumers to pay an extra refundable £5 per device at purchase, with the money returned when the device is handed back, as recent recycling-facility fires, including a major Widnes blaze reportedly very likely caused by a vape, draw greater attention to the risks of improperly discarded lithium-battery devices.
Jul.01
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives
French Anti-Tobacco Group Questions PMI’s IQOS “Curiosity” Campaign Over Potential Youth Appeal
French Anti-Tobacco Group Questions PMI’s IQOS “Curiosity” Campaign Over Potential Youth Appeal
According to French anti-tobacco group Générations Sans Tabac, Philip Morris International’s (PMI) IQOS “Curiosity” campaign has drawn attention from public health advocates. The group argues that the campaign uses themes including curiosity, exploration and lifestyle branding that could increase interest among younger audiences. PMI has positioned IQOS as a key part of its smoke-free product strategy, while France maintains strict restrictions on tobacco and nicotine product marketing. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between heated tobacco branding strategies and public health concerns in Europe.
Jul.24