Debunking Myths: E-cigarettes Are Safer Than Tobacco Smoking

Oct.04.2022
Debunking Myths: E-cigarettes Are Safer Than Tobacco Smoking
Forbes emphasizes that electronic cigarettes are less harmful than traditional tobacco products and can aid in quitting smoking.

Forbes emphasizes that while both tobacco and electronic cigarette products contain nicotine, which can lead to addiction, the former is deadly while the latter is not. They also highlight the fact that all the deadly components found in cigarettes, such as tar, are not present in electronic cigarettes.


The editor went on to mention countries like the United Kingdom that strongly recommend these products for smoking cessation and tout them as more effective than nicotine patches, gum, and lozenges. He emphasized the fact that anti-vaping groups have been focused on the increase in youth e-cigarette use over the past decade. However, they have overlooked the fact that this increase has led to a decrease in youth smoking rates.


Misinformation about e-cigarettes is harming public health.


According to Forbes, the dissemination of misinformation is causing significant harm to public health. Supporting this argument, a new study published in BMC Public Health examined data from the US PATH survey (2014-2019) and found that "risk misconceptions" about e-cigarettes are still on the rise. Despite all scientific evidence suggesting the relative safety of the product, unfortunately, in 2019, 83% of US smokers erroneously believed that e-cigarettes were as harmful as or even more harmful than smoking.


It is not surprising that smokers who hold these inaccurate beliefs about electronic cigarettes are unlikely to try and/or switch to e-cigarettes. However, smokers who are aware of the safety of e-cigarette products are 134% more likely to try using e-cigarettes and 127% more likely to quit smoking.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of its contents. The article's translation is only intended for industry-related communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not completely reflect the original, so please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and foreign-related discourse and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belarus Proposes Criminal Liability for Selling Vapes to Minors
Belarus Proposes Criminal Liability for Selling Vapes to Minors
Belarus is discussing the introduction of criminal liability for selling vapes and related nicotine-containing products to minors. During a meeting of the expert council, a draft law regulating tobacco and non-tobacco nicotine products received support from most members.
Dec.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thailand Seizes Over 42,000 Illegal Vapes Worth USD 340,000
Thailand Seizes Over 42,000 Illegal Vapes Worth USD 340,000
Thai authorities announced the seizure of more than 42,000 smuggled vapes worth approximately THB 10.87 million (USD 340,000).
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
China officially cancels e-cigarette export tax rebate, putting manufacturing under cost and risk pressure.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China to Cancel VAT Export Rebates on E-Cigarette Products from April 1, 2026
China to Cancel VAT Export Rebates on E-Cigarette Products from April 1, 2026
China’s Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration have announced adjustments to export tax rebate policies, placing nicotine-containing non-combustible inhalation products within the scope of items subject to rebate cancellation. The measures will take effect from April 1, 2026.
Regulations
Jan.10
Malaysian Sabah GOF seizes e-cigarettes, vapes and e-liquids worth over  USD 156,333 in seven-district operation
Malaysian Sabah GOF seizes e-cigarettes, vapes and e-liquids worth over USD 156,333 in seven-district operation
In Sabah, Malaysia’s General Operations Force (GOF) seized thousands of e-cigarette devices, vapes and e-liquids worth more than RM635,000 and detained 23 people during a simultaneous integrated operation across seven districts.
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai