ELFBAR Seeks Injunction Against U.S. Firm for Alleged Counterfeiting

BusinessElfbar by Ashe Wong
Jul.19.2023
ELFBAR Seeks Injunction Against U.S. Firm for Alleged Counterfeiting
Chinese e-cigarette maker iMiracle petitions for U.S. injunction against VPR Brands for alleged counterfeiting.

According to LAW360, renowned Chinese disposable e-cigarette brand ELFBAR's manufacturer, iMiracle, applied to a federal judge in Georgia, USA, seeking to ban American firm VPR Brands LP from selling its "low-quality", "counterfeit" e-cigarettes.

 

In its motion for a preliminary injunction against VPR Brands, iMiracle argued that for years, VPR Brands witnessed ELFBAR become one of the "most successful brands" in the country, but instead of attempting fair competition, VPR used "fraudulent" trademark registration to hinder iMiracle, rolling out its own "counterfeit products."

 

The company stated:

"Although VPR and its licensors just started selling their counterfeit products, it is clear from their branding as the 'original ElfBar' that VPR is capitalizing on iMiracle's good reputation and word-of-mouth."

 

VPR Brands initially brought a lawsuit in October 2022, claiming iMiracle and other companies infringed on the rights of the Elf name as the company held registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. It relied on its registration to convince U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon to issue a preliminary injunction against iMiracle and other companies in February 2023, banning them from selling e-cigarettes with the Elf name.

 

Following this, VPR Brands launched its own disposable e-cigarette line—Elfbar BP5000 and Elf VPR 7000. iMiracle alleges these products wholly mimic iMiracle's ELFBAR e-cigarettes, even including the same flavors, shape, and color scheme.

 

iMiracle asserts that VPR Brands' immediate launch of disposable e-cigarettes after being banned from using the Elfbar name was a clear attempt to confuse consumers and exploit the good relations iMiracle had established with customers. iMiracle is seeking to prohibit VPR Brands from selling products under the Elfbar name. They also requested the preliminary injunction bond be set at zero, pointing out VPR Brands cannot claim to have lost normal profits.

 

It is noteworthy that when Judge Cannon issued the injunction against iMiracle, she set the bond at $500,000, despite these companies claiming they would lose tens of millions of dollars due to the injunction.

 

In June 2023, iMiracle counter-sued, and another Chinese company, GD Sigelei, also claimed it first launched and sold the "Elf Tank" "sub-brand" in April 2016. Therefore, it has common law rights to the "Elf" name. These companies contend VPR Brands' "Elf" trademark is invalid.

 

Moreover, VPR's "Elf" trademark was "copied" during its interaction with another Chinese company, Clean Vapor Technology, in 2017. This company is a third-party manufacturer, not a litigant, and it is still a supplier to VPR, but they allege that VPR did not obtain the rights to use the name from the company.

 

VPR Brands has filed a motion to dismiss the Georgia counterclaim, stating it should not be compelled to deal with third-party counterclaims brought by foreign entities, asserting the first-to-file rule necessitates these suits to be heard in Florida.

 

Reference: 

[1] Chinese Vape Maker Urges Court To Bar Fla. Co.'s 'Elfbar' Use

*The content of this article is written after the extraction, compilation and integration of multiple information for exchange and learning purposes. The copyright of the summary information still belongs to the original article and its author. If any infringement is found, please contact us to delete it. 

Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
Trump’s Tobacco Investments and Industry Donations Draw Scrutiny as FDA Eases Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules
A report by KFF Health News says that as the Trump administration pursued a series of policies favorable to the nicotine and tobacco industry, President Donald Trump increased his holdings in tobacco companies while benefiting from substantial industry-linked political donations, prompting questions from public health advocates about potential conflicts of interest and regulatory direction.
Jun.12
FDA Tobacco Center Pushes Review-Efficiency Statement After Commissioner’s Exit
FDA Tobacco Center Pushes Review-Efficiency Statement After Commissioner’s Exit
FDA CTP issued a May 7 statement on accelerating product review and improving PMTA efficiency, but did not push it via official X and newsletter until May 13, one day after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary’s resignation was confirmed. FDA has not explained the delay, and no public evidence links it directly to the leadership change. The timing is notable given CTP’s usual 24-hour distribution practice.
Special Report
May.14
FDA Warns Retailers Over Unauthorized Nicotine Pouches Resembling Candy and Everyday Products
FDA Warns Retailers Over Unauthorized Nicotine Pouches Resembling Candy and Everyday Products
The FDA issued warning letters to eight retailers selling unauthorized nicotine pouches and dissolvable tobacco products resembling candy, breath strips and cough drops. The action highlights rising scrutiny of packaging, youth appeal and accidental ingestion risks, as the agency clarifies enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS and nicotine pouch products while maintaining PMTA as the legal market pathway.
Special Report
May.21
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
AP Questions FDA Rationale as Glas Fruit-Flavored Vapes Won Authorization Without Added Cessation Benefit
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized two fruit-flavored vaping products from Glas, but a newly released agency memo shows the products did not demonstrate greater smoking-cessation benefits than tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes. The Associated Press said the findings are likely to raise further questions about the FDA’s regulatory rationale and standards for flavored vaping products.
Jun.12
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
An opinion article published by Stars and Stripes argued that the Pentagon’s January nicotine clinical guidelines overemphasize abstinence, fail to reflect the reality that about 30% of active-duty personnel use nicotine, and do not address nicotine pouches as potential harm-reduction products.
Industry Insight
Jun.08
Altria’s USSTC to Close Nashville Plant and Shift Operations to Kentucky by 2028
Altria’s USSTC to Close Nashville Plant and Shift Operations to Kentucky by 2028
U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company (USSTC), a subsidiary of Altria Group, announced plans to close its Nashville manufacturing facility by 2028 and consolidate production operations at a new facility in Hopkinsville, Kentucky.
Market
Jun.02