FDA Authorizes Copenhagen Classic Snuff as Modified Risk Tobacco Product

Mar.17.2023
FDA Authorizes Copenhagen Classic Snuff as Modified Risk Tobacco Product
The FDA authorized Copenhagen Snuff as a modified risk tobacco product, claiming to reduce lung cancer risks compared to cigarettes.

On March 16th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized the sale of Copenhagen Classic snuff, a smokeless tobacco product, as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) by the US Smokeless Tobacco Company. Copenhagen's moist snuff smokeless tobacco product is an existing tobacco product that has been sold in the US for years without a modified risk message. Today's action now allows for the product to be sold as a modified risk product, claiming that "if you smoke, consider this product. Completely switching from cigarettes to this product can reduce the risk of lung cancer.


According to Dr. Brian King, MPH in Public Health, "There is no safe tobacco product, nor is there an 'FDA approved' product, so non-tobacco users should not start using them. However, tobacco products do pose a risk, with smokers being the most at risk. In this case, FDA scientific review found that if an adult smoker completely switches from cigarettes to this smokeless product, it will reduce their risk of lung cancer.


After rigorous examination of the available evidence, including recommendations from the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, public opinion, and other available scientific information, the FDA has determined that specific statements related to lung cancer risk with Copenhagen Classic Snuff are scientifically accurate. Data suggests that if current smokers were to switch entirely to this product, they would reduce their risk of developing lung cancer. The review also found that these public health benefits are not expected to be offset by non-users initiating use of the product.


The issued risk modification order from this agency prohibits the company from making any additional modified risk statements when selling the product, including statements related to any outcomes other than lung cancer risk, or conveying or possibly misleading consumers to believe that the product is approved or endorsed by the FDA, or that the FDA deems the product to be safe for consumers.


The company is required to conduct post-market surveillance and research, which includes evaluating the behavior and understanding of product users, examining any prior use of tobacco products, and assessing the long-term impact on public health through scientific modeling.


The revised risk grant will expire in five years, and the company must apply for and receive FDA authorization to continue selling the modified risk product. At any point, if the agency determines that this order is no longer advantageous for public health, it must be revoked.


The case is now in the hands of the company's court, and Dr. Jin explains that there will be market research and monitoring of its impact on consumers, with this information being submitted annually to the FDA. If scientific evidence shows that the net benefits of these products no longer outweigh the risks to the population, or if the company fails to conduct the necessary post-market surveillance and research, the FDA is committed to taking appropriate action, including issuing recalls, to protect public health.


The MRTP process outlined in the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act allows companies to submit applications for the FDA to evaluate whether tobacco products can be sold or distributed in order to reduce harm or the risk of tobacco-related illnesses. According to the law, the FDA must also ensure that the advertising and labeling of risk-modified products is clear in informing the public about the modified risks or exposure information and how it relates to overall health and all tobacco-related illnesses and health conditions.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Sweden Finds ZYN Ingredient Labels Noncompliant Over Generic Flavoring Disclosure, Swedish Match Faces SEK 2 Million Monthly Penalty
Sweden Finds ZYN Ingredient Labels Noncompliant Over Generic Flavoring Disclosure, Swedish Match Faces SEK 2 Million Monthly Penalty
Sweden's Public Health Agency has found ingredient labels on ZYN nicotine pouches sold by Philip Morris International subsidiary Swedish Match to be noncompliant, according to Dagens industri. The products' packaging listed 10 to 13 ingredients, compared with 11 to 42 in regulatory submissions, with multiple flavoring ingredients grouped under the generic term "aromer." The agency ordered corrective action, warning of a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. The order applies only to products manufactured after the decision becomes legally effective and does not require recalls. Swedish Match disputes the agency's interpretation and plans to appeal.
PMI
Oct.22
Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has named Bret Koplow permanent director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, ending his period as acting chief. Koplow has spent years working on tobacco regulation, law and policy inside the FDA and, while serving as acting director, pushed for faster PMTA reviews and nicotine pouch review pilots. HHS also said CTP will prioritize innovation and access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers while continuing efforts to protect youth.
Sep.09
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
Following recent FDA authorizations for JUUL2 and ZYN ULTRA, 2Firsts Compliance Solutions held an online PMTA briefing on Sept. 4 to examine what the decisions may signal about review efficiency, scientific evidence and U.S. market access. Nearly 30 participants from brands, manufacturers, compliance service providers and investment firms joined the discussion.
2Firsts Events
Sep.06
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03