FDA Grants MRTP Orders for 20 ZYN Nicotine Pouches

Jul.01
FDA Grants MRTP Orders for 20 ZYN Nicotine Pouches
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued modified risk granted orders to Swedish Match USA for 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products, allowing the already-authorized products to be marketed with a specific claim that using ZYN instead of cigarettes lowers the risk of mouth cancer, heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Key Points

  • FDA granted MRTP orders for 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products.
  • The products were previously authorized through PMTA in January 2025.
  • The orders allow one specific lower-risk marketing claim.
  • The authorization lasts five years and requires postmarket surveillance.

2Firsts

July 1, 2026

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it has issued modified risk granted orders to Swedish Match USA for 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products, allowing the products to be marketed in the United States with a specific modified risk claim.

20 ZYN Products Receive MRTP Orders

FDA said the authorization covers 20 ZYN nicotine pouch products. The products were previously authorized for sale in the United States through the premarket tobacco product application, or PMTA, pathway in January 2025.

The MRTP orders allow the products to use the following claim: “Using ZYN instead of cigarettes puts you at a lower risk of mouth cancer, heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis.”

The authorized products cover 10 flavors, each in two nicotine strengths, 3 mg and 6 mg, for a total of 20 products. The flavors are ZYN Chill, ZYN Cinnamon, ZYN Citrus, ZYN Coffee, ZYN Cool Mint, ZYN Menthol, ZYN Peppermint, ZYN Smooth, ZYN Spearmint and ZYN Wintergreen.

FDA said a modified risk tobacco product order applies to specific products, not an entire tobacco product class or nicotine pouch category.

FDA Review Covered Consumer Understanding and Youth Risk

FDA said its scientific review considered several factors: the products’ relative health risks to individuals who use tobacco, consumer understanding and perception of the products marketed with the modified risk claim, youth-risk data and the potential impact on the population as a whole.

The agency concluded that Swedish Match had demonstrated that the specific modified risk claim is scientifically accurate for these ZYN products, that consumers understand the claim and that marketing the products with the claim would benefit the population as a whole.

Bret Koplow, acting director of FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, said FDA’s review of modified risk products is intended to ensure that adult users have clear, science-based information about the relative harms of tobacco products so they can make informed choices.

FDA also said it considered recommendations from the January 22, 2026, Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee meeting, public comments, data and information submitted to the agency, and other scientific information identified by FDA.

PMTA and MRTP Are Different Pathways

FDA stressed that PMTA authorization and MRTP authorization are separate regulatory pathways.

Authorization through the PMTA pathway allows a new tobacco product to be legally sold in the United States. The MRTP pathway is optional and allows a company, if it meets a higher scientific standard, to communicate FDA-authorized relative-risk information about specific products.

The ZYN products had already received PMTA authorization and therefore could be sold in the U.S. market. The new MRTP orders further allow these specific products to use a specific modified risk claim reviewed by FDA.

This distinction is important for the industry. Under the U.S. regulatory system, “authorized for sale” and “authorized to communicate lower-risk information” are not the same. Companies seeking to make relative-risk communications must go through the MRTP pathway and obtain separate authorization.

Five-Year Orders With Postmarket Requirements

FDA said the authorization requires Swedish Match USA to conduct postmarket surveillance and studies, including assessments of MRTP users’ behaviours and their understanding of risk-related information.

The orders will expire in five years. Before expiration, the company may request and receive FDA authorization to continue marketing the products as modified risk tobacco products.

FDA also said it may withdraw the orders if it determines at any point that continued MRTP marketing no longer benefits the health of the population as a whole, including if there is a significant increase in youth uptake.

FDA emphasised that there is no safe tobacco product and that people who do not use tobacco products should not start. For adults who currently smoke cigarettes, fully quitting all tobacco products would most benefit their health. However, switching completely from cigarettes to FDA-authorized nicotine pouches may reduce exposure to many harmful chemicals found in cigarettes.

To date, FDA has authorized 26 nicotine pouch products. These products have undergone scientific review and were found by FDA to meet the applicable public health standard.

Industry Impact and Next Steps

From an industry perspective, FDA’s decision sends three signals.

First, the regulatory position of nicotine pouches in the U.S. market is becoming clearer. ZYN had already received PMTA authorization, and the new MRTP orders show that some nicotine pouch products may obtain limited modified-risk communication rights if they meet the evidentiary standard.

Second, MRTP authorization may become an important regulatory asset for nicotine pouch brand differentiation. For companies, marketing authorization is the entry point; the ability to lawfully use relative-risk claims may affect brand communication, consumer education and channel strategy.

Third, youth risk remains a central FDA constraint. The authorization does not mean regulatory relaxation. Companies must continue to demonstrate that the products and related marketing do not significantly increase youth use or undermine population health.

For the nicotine pouch industry, ZYN’s MRTP authorization may encourage other brands to consider modified-risk applications. However, FDA made clear that MRTP orders apply only to specific products and specific claims, not to the entire category. Other companies would still need to submit their own data and undergo case-by-case review.

Key issues to watch include how Swedish Match uses the authorized modified risk claim in the U.S. market, how the claim appears on packaging, websites, retail materials and consumer communications, and how FDA evaluates postmarket surveillance data.

Overall, FDA’s decision is not a broad endorsement of the nicotine pouch category. It is an authorization for 20 specific ZYN products, one specific claim and a specific body of evidence. It moves U.S. nicotine pouch regulation from the question of market entry toward the question of reviewed and authorized relative-risk communication.

Follow 2Firsts for the latest updates on global tobacco harm reduction, nicotine products and regulatory developments.

Cover image:generated by AI


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana Halts Sales of Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG and iJOY Vapes Under Foreign-Adversary Rules; Some Products Return After Compliance Filings
Indiana's Alcohol and Tobacco Commission (ATC) ordered tobacco certificate holders in September to remove certain vaping products marketed under Elf Bar, Lost Mary, MR FOG, iJOY and other brands from inventory under the state's foreign-adversary product law. The agency later listed 257 MR FOG products and 77 Lost Mary product entries as lawful for sale. The Lost Mary revision expressly stated that compliance evidence had been received for 20 additional products. 2Firsts compliance expert Kurt said potential filings could include e-liquid and ingredient-origin records, U.S. nicotine-analog supply-chain documentation and FDA premarket application status.
Regulations
Oct.08
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09