India bans sale and manufacturing of tobacco products.

Sep.06.2022
India bans sale and manufacturing of tobacco products.
India's health ministry bans the sale and use of all tobacco and nicotine products under the Food Safety and Standards Act.

The Ministry of Health has announced a complete ban on the sale, manufacturing, distribution, or use of all tobacco and nicotine-containing products, including Gutkha, Pan Masala, Chhap Tobacco, Pure Tobacco, Kaini, Zarda, and Flavoured and flavoured tobacco, in accordance with the Food Safety and Standards Act of 2006, to protect public interest.


In a notice, V Vumlumang, the Food Safety Commissioner and Deputy Secretary General for Health and FW, stated that products containing tobacco and nicotine are harmful to human health. In accordance with regulations from the 2011 "Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restriction on Sales) Act," the sale of consumer products containing tobacco and nicotine as ingredients is prohibited.


In a recent ruling, India's Supreme Court stated that manufacturers are selling a product called pan masala (tobacco-free chewable tobacco) packaged in separate small packets with added spices in order to circumvent a ban on the sale of gutka. However, these products are typically sold together by the same supplier from the same place, allowing consumers to purchase both pan masala and spicy chewable tobacco and mix them together for consumption.


Therefore, the Supreme Court has instructed relevant legal institutions to comply with the legal authorization of the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restriction of Sales) Regulation 2.3.4 in 2011, and has directed all state and federal territory health ministers to ensure full compliance with the ban on the manufacture and sale of gutkha and pan masala containing tobacco and/or nicotine.


He reported that in order to protect public health, Manipur would ban the manufacture, storage, distribution, or sale of gutka and pan masala for a period of one year.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's contents. The translation of this article is only intended for internal industry research and communication purposes.


Due to the limitations in translation proficiency, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign statements and positions.


Copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If infringement occurs, please contact for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Singapore Experts warn “vitamin diffusers” are not a healthy alternative to vapes; HSA steps up enforcement
Singapore Experts warn “vitamin diffusers” are not a healthy alternative to vapes; HSA steps up enforcement
Driven by social media promotion, “vitamin diffusers” are being marketed online as a healthier substitute for e-vaporisers. Singapore respiratory and pharmacy experts caution that ingredient lists are unclear, heating can generate unknown degradants, and there is no medical evidence of health benefits from inhaled vitamins. The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) recently fined a man found with a vitamin diffuser and reminded the public that imitation tobacco products are illegal. Authorities have a
Sep.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
17 Anslow County store clerks sued for selling e-cigarette products to minors
17 Anslow County store clerks sued for selling e-cigarette products to minors
17 store clerks in Anslo County, USA, charged for selling e-cigarette products to minors, part of Operation Vape Zero crackdown.
Aug.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia’s Perlis and Terengganu Ban Vape Sales Starting August; Violators May Face Forced Closure
Malaysia’s Perlis and Terengganu Ban Vape Sales Starting August; Violators May Face Forced Closure
As of August 1, Perlis and Terengganu have enforced vape sales bans. Retailers violating the ban face immediate closure, with non-compliance leading to forced shutdowns. The move follows Islamic law rulings and aligns both states with Johor and Kelantan.
Aug.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakh Man Fined $146 for Illegal Sale of e-cigarettes in Uralsk
Kazakh Man Fined $146 for Illegal Sale of e-cigarettes in Uralsk
A man in Ural'sk, Kazakhstan, was fined 78,640 tenge (about 146 US dollars) for illegal e-cigarette sales. The police took swift action after the case was exposed.
Aug.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Research Abstract | Flavored E-Cigarettes Disrupt Placental Development and Pregnancy Outcomes Regardless of Nicotine Content
Research Abstract | Flavored E-Cigarettes Disrupt Placental Development and Pregnancy Outcomes Regardless of Nicotine Content
A new study shows that flavored e-cigarettes, even without nicotine, can interfere with embryo implantation and placental development, increasing the risks of miscarriage and fetal growth restriction, underscoring their potential threat to pregnancy safety.
Sep.01 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division has rejected Latvian company Baltic Trade Solutions’ application for the “Royal Smoke” trademark, intended for use on e-cigarettes and related products. The decision found the mark too similar to British American Tobacco’s “Royals” cigarette brand, creating a likelihood that average consumers would mistakenly believe the two are connected. Both marks cover products within the “smokers’ articles” category.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai