India's recent ban on e-cigarettes: A hasty decision?

Sep.06.2022
India's recent ban on e-cigarettes: A hasty decision?
Indian government bans e-cigarettes, citing concerns over adolescent addiction, but critics argue the ban is unfair and counterproductive.

In 2019, the Indian government implemented the "2019 Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes Act," which banned the production, import, export, transportation, sale, or advertisement of e-cigarettes, considered as an alternative smoking device. These products are sold globally and are subject to appropriate regulatory controls, serving as a viable and less harmful option for consumers compared to other legally available tobacco products in India. Why was this irrational ban hurriedly imposed? Why does this discriminatory measure restrict consumers' basic right to make informed choices and not include e-cigarettes on the list of existing tobacco products? We must pose these questions to legislators because this unjustified ban is not only arbitrary but also unfair to citizens.


The government's concern is justified as they have been implementing anti-tobacco measures relentlessly in line with the regulations set forth in the 2003 COTPA and the first global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), by introducing warning labels and educating people. One of the main concerns of the government is that alternative products are becoming a gateway for young people and will only lead to another form of addiction.


However, on the contrary, it has been observed that unreasonable bans encourage the acquisition of unsafe products and allow young people and legal consumers to use non-compliant products in an unregulated manner. The serious issue is that the government has lost all forms of control over these underground products. There are many reports indicating that India is selling unqualified and potentially dangerous products on the black market.


It has been observed that most countries have classified all such "substitutes" as products with less harm under regulatory supervision and "suitable for protecting public health". The recent development is in the Philippines, where the country's policy towards such products has made a 180-degree shift.


In the Philippines, the sale of such products is allowed but not regulated. E-cigarettes are classified as "health-related devices" and require medical approval from the FDA for regulation. However, due to the strict regulations imposed by agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration, obtaining the necessary license application has many limitations. If such products are not restricted from use by minors, they cannot be regulated as consumer goods. Therefore, some suggest that they be regulated similarly to tobacco products. Additionally, organizations such as the UK Public Health Department and the British Lung Foundation emphasize the importance of regulating e-cigarettes in a manner different from traditional cigarettes. Furthermore, the medical community acknowledges that widespread use of such alternative products can be a component of reducing harm.


The Philippines has established a comprehensive regulatory framework for the import, manufacture, sale, promotion, distribution, use, and dissemination of electronic cigarette products, including e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products. This framework reflects the principle of proportionate risk regulation. For example, it has established different health warnings for non-combustible products compared to cigarettes. The Department of Trade and Industry has been tasked with collaborating with the FDA to develop technical standards for the safety, consistency, and quality of electronic cigarette products. The DTI has also been authorized to regulate the devices for nicotine and non-nicotine-containing products, as well as new tobacco products made from tobacco or containing nicotine.


Statement:


This article is compiled based on third-party information and is for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the view of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the compiled article may not express the original text accurately. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS aligns completely with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, kindly contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
UK consumer goods group Supreme said its vaping revenue rose 15% to £148.1 million in the year to March 31, 2026, despite the UK disposable vape ban taking effect during the period, while the company identified the Vaping Products Duty due in October as the next major industry milestone.
Regulations
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
UK Proposes Stricter Vape Packaging Rules as Retailers Warn of £330 Million Impact
The UK government has launched a nationwide consultation on vape packaging, appearance and retail displays, proposing tighter rules to reduce youth appeal while industry groups warn of significant compliance costs.
Innovation
Jul.20
JAMA Issues First U.S. Clinical Guidance on Vaping for Smoking Cessation, Urging Complete Switch From Cigarettes
JAMA Issues First U.S. Clinical Guidance on Vaping for Smoking Cessation, Urging Complete Switch From Cigarettes
JAMA has published a Special Communication offering systematic recommendations for U.S.-based clinicians on the use of nicotine e-cigarettes in adult smoking cessation. Developed by the Harm Reduction Workgroup of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco’s Treatment Research Network, the paper recommends including e-cigarettes alongside FDA-approved cessation medications in risk-benefit discussions. It cites high-certainty evidence that nicotine e-cigarettes achieve higher quit rates than nicotine replacement therapy and evidence suggesting efficacy comparable to highly effective medications such as varenicline and cytisine. For adults who choose vaping to quit, the authors recommend FDA-authorized products, sufficient nicotine delivery and a rapid, complete transition away from cigarettes rather than prolonged dual use.
Aug.13
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives