MEPs seek Commission answers over EU trade officials’ contacts with PMI

Jan.15
MEPs seek Commission answers over EU trade officials’ contacts with PMI
POLITICO reports that five members of the European Parliament’s health committee want to invite the European Commission to answer questions about its contacts with Philip Morris International (PMI), following a POLITICO and The Examination investigation into extensive meetings between EU trade officials and tobacco lobbyists.

Key points

 

• Five health committee MEPs want the Commission invited to answer questions about contacts with PMI

• POLITICO and The Examination reported extensive meetings between EU trade officials and tobacco lobbyists

• Documents indicate discussions on overseas market barriers and at least three subsequent actions that would have benefited PMI

• WHO treaty obligations cited: interaction limited to “strictly necessary” and meetings must be transparent; not all were disclosed via normal channels

• A Tobacco Products Directive overhaul targeting vapes is due this year, a process expected to draw intensive lobbying

 


 

2Firsts, January 15, 2026 – According to POLITICO, the European Commission is facing rising pressure from lawmakers to explain its contacts with Philip Morris International (PMI) after a POLITICO and The Examination investigation reported extensive meetings between EU trade officials and tobacco lobbyists.

 

POLITICO reports that five members of the European Parliament’s health committee confirmed they want to invite the Commission to answer questions amid concerns it may have violated global rules on tobacco lobbying.

 

The report says documents show PMI discussed overseas market barriers for its tobacco and nicotine products with EU trade officials, who later took action at least three times that would have benefited the company. In one email, PMI thanked EU trade officials for the “great help” they had provided.

 

POLITICO notes the EU has signed a World Health Organization treaty stating governments should limit their interaction with the tobacco industry to what is “strictly necessary” in order to regulate the sector, and that any meetings must be transparent. The report adds that not all meetings were disclosed through the Commission’s normal channels.

 

The report says the issue comes as the Commission seeks to reassert itself as a global leader in tobacco control, with an overhaul of its Tobacco Products Directive to tackle vapes due to arrive this year — a process expected to attract intensive lobbying.

 

MEP Romana Jerković (S&D) is quoted saying commercial interests are winning over public health objectives and calling for a clear line between public policy and tobacco lobbying. The report also attributes the initial call for a Commission appearance to Nicolás González Casares (S&D), supported by Tiemo Wölken (S&D), Tilly Metz (Greens) and Stine Bosse (Renew).

 

POLITICO reports the decision to invite the Commission will rest with health committee party coordinators and chair Adam Jarubas (EPP), who did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

 

A Commission spokesperson told POLITICO and The Examination last month that the EU executive “strictly follows” the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and “does not shape, influence or lobby for specific health policies in third countries on behalf of any industry.” The report adds that a Commission spokesperson did not immediately respond on whether trade officials would appear in Parliament if invited.

 

Image source: POLITICO

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | 2Firsts Exclusive: Breaking Down Pachamama 25K, CHUC’s First U.S.-Made Factory Product
Product | 2Firsts Exclusive: Breaking Down Pachamama 25K, CHUC’s First U.S.-Made Factory Product
U.S. e-cigarette company Charlie’s has brought its first domestic manufacturing facility online, launching the disposable Pachamama 25K, which will initially roll out to 300 retail stores in Texas. The device features a 20 ml e-liquid capacity with 5% nicotine, three power modes and a built-in 1000 mAh battery, and is advertised to deliver up to 25,000 puffs.
Dec.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia’s MOH aims to implement a vape ban in 2026, starting with open pod systems
Malaysia’s MOH aims to implement a vape ban in 2026, starting with open pod systems
Bernama (Malaysia’s national news agency) reported that Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Ministry of Health aims to implement a vape ban this year, beginning with open pod systems, and will not compromise on enforcing the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852).
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. FDA Unveils Next-Generation Agentic AI Tool to Boost Review and Regulatory Efficiency
U.S. FDA Unveils Next-Generation Agentic AI Tool to Boost Review and Regulatory Efficiency
The U.S. FDA has announced the agency-wide deployment of new agentic AI capabilities, providing all employees with an optional multi-step task automation tool. Building on the broad adoption of its earlier large-language-model system, Elsa, the FDA aims to use this next-generation AI workflow to accelerate product review, regulatory oversight, and internal operations, while maintaining strict human supervision and data security.
Dec.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal to Launch Dual Open-System Devices Globally in Q1 2026
Kardinal OS and Syn Signal Strategic Expansion in Open-System ENDS
Dec.31
Harm Reduction Experts Warn: FCTC COP11 Policies Risk Marginalizing the Global South
Harm Reduction Experts Warn: FCTC COP11 Policies Risk Marginalizing the Global South
Two global tobacco harm reduction experts, in their submission to 2Firsts, argue that several COP11 policy proposals driven by high-income countries do not align with the capacities and conditions of low- and middle-income countries. They highlight research and funding gaps and call for a more equitable global support mechanism.
Nov.19
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai