Ohio Police Shoot and Kill Unarmed Black Man

Sep.01.2022
Ohio Police Shoot and Kill Unarmed Black Man
Ohio cop fatally shoots an unarmed 20-year-old black man holding an e-cigarette, mistaken for a gun, sparking investigations.

A police officer in Ohio fatally shot a 20-year-old black male who was holding an electronic cigarette and raised his hands. The police thought it was a gun.


At a press conference held several hours later, Police Chief Elaine Bryant played body camera footage. The video showed police arriving at an apartment on Sullivan Avenue around 2:30 am to serve an arrest warrant for Lewis, who was wanted for assault. Police waited outside the front door for about 10 minutes before two men emerged and were detained, but there was no sign of Lewis initially. Police then sent in a barking K-9 dog and followed it into the home. Moments later, K-9 Officer Ricky Anderson opened the bedroom door and found Lewis in bed, where he was immediately shot and killed.


According to Bryant, a frame-by-frame review of the video shows that Lewis appeared to have "something" in his hand as he raised his hands when police opened the door and pointed their guns at him.


Kobe stated that no firearms were found on the scene, but an electronic vaping device was discovered on the bed.


According to the Columbus Dispatch, after being shot, the dying Lewis was ordered to "get up" from his bed, then handcuffed and removed from the apartment. After receiving CPR on scene, Lewis was taken to OhioHealth Grant Medical Center where he died within an hour. The chief did not comment on whether authorities believed Lewis had a weapon in his possession, a question that is expected to be resolved by the investigation launched by the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation.


Kobe expressed sympathy and sadness for Donovan Lewis' mother upon his passing. He also expressed sorrow for the community, but stated that they will allow the investigation to proceed. As the newly hired official, he emphasized the city's commitment to holding any officials responsible for any wrongdoing, but stressed that a national investigation must be conducted first.


Disclaimer: 1. The content of this article is compiled from third-party information, and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the accuracy and authenticity of the content. The compilation of this article is for industry exchange and research only. 3. Due to limitations in the level of compilation, the content may differ from the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy. 4. 2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government regarding any statements and positions related to domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign matters. 5. The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Special Report|Virginia Vape Directory Shows Contrast Between Vuse and JUUL Pod Systems and CrossBar 20K, Loon Flavored Disposables
Special Report|Virginia Vape Directory Shows Contrast Between Vuse and JUUL Pod Systems and CrossBar 20K, Loon Flavored Disposables
A 2Firsts analysis of Virginia's liquid nicotine and vapor product certification directory identified 213 product records from 15 manufacturers. Companies associated with BAT, Altria, Imperial Brands, JTI and JUUL account for 127 entries. The directory also includes independent brands CrossBar 20K, Loon and Breeze. CrossBar advertises a 13mL disposable capable of up to 20,000 puffs, while Loon has 16 disposable entries featuring fruit, cooling and beverage-related flavors. Of all records, 120 are labeled as under FDA PMTA review. Virginia introduced revised penalties on October 1, 2026, including a minimum first-violation civil penalty of $5,000 per unlisted product, alongside new retail tobacco permitting requirements.
Regulations
Oct.30
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
F1 Faces Renewed Pressure Over Tobacco and Nicotine Sponsorships as 67 Groups Target ZYN and VELO Ahead of Madrid Race
Ahead of the Formula 1 race in Madrid, 67 Spanish and international public-health, medical and consumer organizations have sent an open letter to F1 President and CEO Stefano Domenicali calling for an end to sponsorships linked to the tobacco and nicotine industry, including nicotine pouches, vaping products and heated tobacco. The letter focuses on Philip Morris International’s ZYN partnership with Ferrari and British American Tobacco’s long-running partnership with McLaren and exposure for VELO. The campaign follows a March letter in which more than 160 organizations worldwide made a similar request to Formula 1.
Sep.10
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
An October 2026 review of U.S. state vapor product directories found KUMI 6 SCENIC 50K listed in Louisiana and Nebraska. Louisiana classifies 20 related product entries as “FDA EXEMPTION.” The SCENIC platform is marketed in both conventional nicotine-salt and NoNic6 formulations, each advertised with 22mL e-liquid capacity and up to 50,000 puffs. U.S. wholesaler Midwest Goods listed both versions in August 2025 with a suggested retail price of $19.99 each. The NoNic6 version is associated with 6-methylnicotine and is also marketed by some distributors as “nicotine-free.”
product
Oct.27
FDA Authorizes 24 VELO Nicotine Pouches, Increasing U.S. Authorized Total by 56%
FDA Authorizes 24 VELO Nicotine Pouches, Increasing U.S. Authorized Total by 56%
The U.S. FDA authorized 24 VELO nicotine pouch products from a British American Tobacco subsidiary, raising the total number of authorized products from 43 to 67, a 55.8% increase. The newly authorized 4 mg products include lime and passion fruit flavors and feature certified child-resistant packaging. VELO's first FDA marketing authorization adds BAT to a list previously limited to PMI and Altria products, while bringing the agency's nicotine pouch review pilot total to 47 authorized products.
Oct.30
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
Special Report | Altria's NACS Booth Raises Questions Over U.S. Tobacco Advertising Warnings
During its coverage of Altria's booth at NACS Show 2026, 2Firsts documented product displays that prompted questions about U.S. tobacco advertising warning requirements. Following public comments from a former FDA official, 2Firsts sought responses from Altria and independently consulted U.S. regulatory lawyer Azim Chowdhury. Altria maintained that its B2B communications complied with applicable laws, while Chowdhury explained that federal warning rules provide no general trade-show exemption for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches. The special report examines the broader regulatory implications.
Nov.04