Patient Survey Shows Concern Over Tobacco Company Ownership of Respiratory Treatment Devices

Aug.16.2022
Patient Survey Shows Concern Over Tobacco Company Ownership of Respiratory Treatment Devices
70% of respondents to an international survey expressed concern about tobacco companies profiting from respiratory disease treatment equipment.

In an international survey conducted earlier this year, 70% of respondents expressed either "concern" or "serious concern" about devices used to treat lung diseases when tobacco companies profit from them through inhalers, drugs, or other means. The results of the study are reported in a communication brief titled "Pharmaceutical Industry's Ownership of Tobacco Business: An International Survey of Patients with Respiratory Diseases," which has been published in the official journal of the British Thoracic Society, Chest.


In an international survey, 70% of respondents stated that they feel "annoyed" when tobacco companies profit from inhalers, medications or other devices used to treat lung diseases.


The survey enabled individuals with chronic lung disease to voice their opinions in conversations about tobacco companies owning companies that develop tools and medications to treat respiratory illnesses. In early 2022, a total of 1,196 individuals who reported using inhalers completed the survey. According to the survey results reported in Thorax, a majority of patients were highly concerned with tobacco companies having financial interests in medication or equipment companies and profiting from life-saving treatments.


The COPD Foundation, Global Allergy and Airways Patient Platform (GAAPP), and Australian Lung Foundation collaborated to conduct a survey of patients with chronic lung disease in English, Spanish, and German from January to March 2022. All responses were kept confidential, and no personal identification information was collected. The majority of respondents (68%) were from North America, although they represented a broader global area. Additionally, most respondents were former smokers (73%), with 11% currently smoking and 15% indicating they had never smoked.


Following the acquisition of pharmaceutical company Vectura by Philip Morris International (PMI) in 2021, patient advocacy groups are calling for clarity on patients' attitudes towards tobacco organizations holding stakes in companies that manufacture respiratory inhalation devices. Vectura has developed several widely used medical delivery devices and/or formulations for inhalation therapy in patients with chronic lung diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma.


We have joined a series of global patient advocacy groups, academic organizations, and relevant individuals in protesting the sale of Vectura to PMI," said Dr. Ruth Tal-Singer, President and CEO of the COPD Foundation and co-author of Thorax. "Furthermore, as we stated in Thorax, the acquisition of Vectura has led to medical associations banning the organization from participating in conferences and publications.


According to Tal-Singer, the missing piece in global advocacy work is the patient voice, which the Foundation considers crucial for dialogue.


Linda Walsh, Chief Community Engagement Officer, discussed the idea of an international patient survey with the COPD360 Community Engagement Committee (COPD360CEnCo), which is composed of patients and caregivers, on behalf of the foundation.


Our vision is to gather different perspectives from at least 1,000 respondents with various lung diseases," said Walsh. "Our community fully supports this survey. After all, patient voices are at the core of our foundation's mission. Allowing patients to share their life experiences related to lung diseases enables us to prioritize research and innovation on what matters most so we can make breakthroughs in treating chronic lung diseases. As the majority of patients demand transparency and ethically-funded treatment options, we must elevate their voices to a level that can create lasting and meaningful change," she added.


In addition to multiple choice questions, the survey also collected responses from 750 patients in free text format, to the following question: "In your own words, what is your opinion on tobacco companies profiting from inhalers and/or drugs for lung diseases?" 78% of respondents answered negatively, with statements such as:


They have won on both ends, the cause and the treatment." "Smoking can lead to lung disease. They should not profit from the diseases they cause. It is morally wrong," said Dr. Byron Thomashow, the Chief Medical Officer of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Foundation and co-author of the Thorax Brief. "They have made a lot of money; they should research and develop treatments for those who use their products." According to Dr. Thomashow, many of the surveyed patients expressed interest in switching inhaler brands if they knew tobacco companies were manufacturing or selling them.


According to Dr. Thomashow, "48% of respondents indicated that they would like transparency around drug ownership and are willing to switch to treatment options not supported by tobacco companies." He noted that this was an unexpected finding, as many of his own patients had expressed a preference for sticking with medications that had worked for them. However, socioeconomic and systemic factors, such as insurance coverage, healthcare system limitations, and convenience, strongly influence patients' ability to make treatment choices, he added.


Tal-Singer stated, "This patient survey supports the position statement issued by professional organizations and provides information for our advocacy efforts towards transparency in determining who benefits from drug sales during shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry professionals for learning and knowledge sharing purposes.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the content. The article has been translated solely for the purpose of industry research and communication.


Due to limitations in the translator's proficiency level, the translated article may not express the original article accurately. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and foreign-related expressions and positions.


Copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands Expands Blu Fruit-Flavour Offerings Following Consumer Preference Data
Imperial Brands Expands Blu Fruit-Flavour Offerings Following Consumer Preference Data
Imperial Brands has announced the launch of a new Sour Berry flavour for its Blu vape range. The product will launch across retail this month, with both the Blu bar kit and Blu pod pack carrying a recommended retail price of GBP 5.99 (approximately USD 7.79, based on 1 GBP ≈ 1.30 USD).
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RLX Technology 2025 Revenue Rises 44.0% YoY to Nearly USD 566.1 million, International Business Accounts for 76.5% in Q4
RLX Technology 2025 Revenue Rises 44.0% YoY to Nearly USD 566.1 million, International Business Accounts for 76.5% in Q4
RLX Technology Inc. announced its unaudited financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025. Q4 net revenue reached RMB 1.1413 billion, a 40.3% year-over-year increase, while full-year net revenue grew 44.0% to RMB 3.9589 billion.
Mar.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
FDA Issues Draft PMTA Guidance for Flavored E-Cigarettes, Maintaining Higher Evidence Bar for Fruit and Sweet Flavors
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 9 released a draft guidance outlining its current thinking on premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs) for flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The document reiterates that fruit, candy, dessert, and other sweet-flavored e-cigarettes present a “significant public health risk” to youth and therefore face a higher evidentiary burden if manufacturers seek marketing authorization.
Mar.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
Editorial says West Virginia’s HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” goes too far, targeting residency and citizenship provisions
A News and Sentinel editorial argues that West Virginia’s HB 5437, the “Vape Safety Act,” goes beyond reasonable regulation by adding provisions barring any part of a vape or smoke shop from being used as a residence and requiring owners to be U.S. citizens.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh High Court rule targets vape-ban clause; fines up to about $1,635 cited
Bangladesh’s High Court issued a rule asking why Section 6(G) of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) Act, 2005 — which bans the import, supply and sale of vapes and e-cigarettes — should not be declared unconstitutional and illegal.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai