Philip Morris International Funds Anti-Smoking Foundation

Nov.21.2022

Philip Morris creates anti-smoking fund with $1 billion allocation over 12 years, met with skepticism from experts.

In September 2017, one of the major tobacco companies, Philip Morris International (PMI), announced its bold move to allocate $1 billion to establish a foundation that aims to curb smoking. PMI pledged to provide an additional $80 million annually towards this initiative for the next 12 years.

At the time, many anti-smoking experts suspected that this move was simply to ensure the popularity and success of Philip Morris' reduced harm product, iQOS. On the other hand, Derek Yach, a well-known anti-tobacco activist who played a major role in the development of the 2005 World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), accepted the position of president of the foundation.

Inclusive approach

At the time, Yach assured his colleagues that he had not "gone to the dark side," adding that his relationship with PMI was based on opportunity rather than trust. "I'm not naive enough to believe that Philip Morris did this to achieve a warm fuzzy feeling about reducing the death rate. No, they wanted to have a lower-risk product and make a profit. That's the beginning and end of it.

Meanwhile, last year, Yach announced that he would be leaving the foundation, but he still believes that tobacco innovation is the way forward. Recently, Tobacco Reporter focused their entire issue on innovation and as part of this, they interviewed the former president of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World.

#Charity

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Nicotine Pouch Sales Surge, Forcing Convenience Stores to Rethink Backbar Layouts

U.S. convenience stores are restructuring backbar displays as nicotine pouches and other modern oral products gain space amid regulatory and product-mix shifts. The New York Association of Convenience Stores reports nicotine pouch sales are up over 40% this year, while some chains are trimming cigarette facings and testing zero-nicotine and herbal alternatives.

Dec.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Kyrgyzstan Extends Import Ban on E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Liquids by Six Months

The Kyrgyz government has extended its ban on the import of electronic cigarettes and nicotine-containing liquids for another six months. The decision, signed by the chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers, covers e-cigarettes, integrated nicotine delivery systems, and nicotine liquids used in such devices. The original ban was introduced in July and was due to expire soon.

Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Spain’s Competition Authority Questions Disposable Vape Ban

Spain’s National Commission on Markets and Competition (CNMC) has issued an opinion on the draft reform of the Tobacco Law proposed by the Ministry of Health, urging reconsideration of several measures. These include a proposed ban on disposable e-cigarettes and the full alignment of vaping products with traditional tobacco regulation.

Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Interpreting FDA’s on! PLUS Authorization: What the Agency’s Press Release Reveals About Its Nicotine Pouch Review Model

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that six on! PLUS nicotine pouch products have received Marketing Granted Orders (MGO) through the PMTA pathway. The authorizations were completed under the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot program in “record time,” with the FDA citing lower levels of harmful constituents while stressing that the decision applies only to the specified products and does not mean they are safe or FDA approved.

Regulations