Police Seize Over 4000 e-Cigarette Pods in Drug Raid

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jun.20.2024
Police Seize Over 4000 e-Cigarette Pods in Drug Raid
New Taipei City police seized over 4000 e-cigarette pods in a drug raid based on a tip, leading to an arrest.

According to a report from Focustaiwan on June 20th, the police in New Taipei City, Taiwan seized over 4,000 e-cigarette replacement pods in a drug raid last week.


According to a press release from the agency, this drug bust was carried out based on an anonymous tip, which reported that a resident in Sanchong District had stockpiled a large number of e-cigarette pods at home. At 5 pm on June 13, the police raided the residence of a 24-year-old man surnamed Dong and seized thousands of replacement pods in various flavors.


According to the police, the man purchased these pods online and sold them on social media platforms, which was his main source of income. In a raid, authorities seized a total of 4,189 pods, estimated to have a market value of 1 million New Taiwan Dollars (approximately $30,868 USD).


In the testing, it was found that these pods contained "Methoxy Ma Huang Tang", a synthetic stimulant classified as a Class III drug in Taiwan, China.


Currently, the man has been arrested and transferred to the New Taipei District Prosecutors Office in Taiwan for investigation on suspicion of violating Taiwan's Harm Prevention Act.


The "Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act" in Taiwan, China prohibits the production, sale, import, supply, and advertising of "imitation tobacco products," including electronic nicotine and non-nicotine delivery systems such as e-cigarettes, pods, and vape pens.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russian Public Group Seeks Website Restrictions on Remote Vape and Nicotine Sales
Russian Public Group Seeks Website Restrictions on Remote Vape and Nicotine Sales
Russian public movement “Healthy Fatherland,” has proposed blocking access in Russia to online resources that sell vapes and nicotine-containing products remotely.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian business groups are trying to persuade the authorities to abandon plans to ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related liquids at both the federal and regional levels.
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
State Attorneys General Urge Visa, Mastercard and Others to Stop Processing Illicit E-Cigarette Transactions
State Attorneys General Urge Visa, Mastercard and Others to Stop Processing Illicit E-Cigarette Transactions
Fourteen U.S. state attorneys general sent a joint letter dated April 14, 2026 to Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Discover, asking them to immediately help stop the sale of illicit e-cigarette products by cutting off payment access.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
EU Launches Online Feedback as TPD Revision Enters New Milestone
The European Commission has opened an online call for evidence on revising EU tobacco products and advertising rules, marking a new phase in the TPD/TAD review. Policy options may cover novel products, flavours, packaging, digital marketing and advertising. A 2Firsts review of 855 early submissions shows rapid engagement and recurring debate over differentiated regulation, harm reduction, youth protection, illicit trade and economic impact.
Special Report
May.21
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul are asking a California federal court to pause an antitrust case while they appeal a class certification ruling to the Ninth Circuit. The case alleges that Altria’s 2018 investment in Juul, a $12.8 billion deal for a 35% stake.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai