Revision and Public Consultation of National Cigar Standards

Aug.21.2024

State Tobacco Monopoly Administration seeks public opinion on draft of national standard for cigars, urging industry feedback.

Recently, the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration issued an announcement stating that, according to the National Standardization Management Committee's standard revision plan, the Administration has organized the completion of the national standard for "Cigars" (draft for solicitation of opinions), and is now seeking public opinions.

According to reports, this document will replace "Cigars Part 1: Product Classification and Sampling Technical Requirements," "Cigars Part 2: Packaging Labeling," "Cigars Part 3: Product Packaging, Rolling, and Storage Technical Requirements," and "Cigars Part 4: Sensory Technical Requirements.

Simultaneously, the announcement also released the "Cigar" national standard drafting instructions. The National Standard Revision Project Team drafted the content of eight chapters including the scope of the standard, normative references, terms and definitions, product classification, sensory technical requirements, labeling and packaging requirements, inspection methods, storage and transportation, and researched and formulated sensory inspection methods for cigars as a normative appendix to this standard, ultimately forming the draft of the "Cigar" standard.

This statement points out that the current standards for defining and categorizing cigars do not take into account different styles of cigars. This lack of alignment with international cigar standards hinders the ability to meet the changing demands of the Chinese cigar market. It is necessary to revise the standards in order to clearly define what constitutes a cigar and scientifically classify cigar products.

For any suggestions or personal research on the development of the national standards for "cigar" and Chinese-style cigars, readers are welcome to communicate with 2Firsts. Please email us at info@2firsts.com. Thank you.

Click to download: National Standard for Cigars (Draft for Consultation)

Guidelines for the creation of national standards for cigars

Source: State Tobacco Monopoly Administration

Please refer to official information for accuracy.

References:

[1] 关于征求《雪茄烟》国家标准(征求意见稿)意见的通知

Also Read:

[1] Revision of E-cigarette Technical Evaluation Guidelines: Public Consultation Notice

[2] State Tobacco Monopoly Administration Solicits Public Opinions on E-cigarette Management

#Traditional tobacco #Legislation #Asia #China

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn

Notice

1. This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2. The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4. Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

Copyright

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Bangladesh Approves Ordinance Banning E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products

Bangladesh’s Advisory Council on December 24 approved the Smoking and Tobacco Products Usage (Control) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025, aimed at strengthening tobacco control laws. The ordinance bans the use, production and marketing of emerging tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery systems and heated tobacco products. Nicotine pouches are included in the definition of tobacco products.

Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai

Russia’s Public Chamber official opposes “generational ban” on tobacco sales, citing rights concerns

Vladislav Grib, deputy secretary of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation, said a “generational ban” on cigarette sales—restricting sales based on year of birth—would not resolve smoking and would instead lead to human rights violations. He argued older cohorts would buy and share, and the approach would split citizens into two categories.

Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai

German Environment Minister Backs Ban on Disposable E-Cigarettes, Citing Safety Risks

Germany’s Environment Minister Carsten Schneider has expressed clear support for banning disposable e-cigarettes, citing safety hazards, environmental damage, and waste management risks. While the ban has not yet been finalized, Germany’s parliament has instructed the government to examine the proposal. Several European countries, including Belgium, France, and the UK, have already implemented similar bans.

Dec.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai

NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects

A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.