San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes

Aug.17.2022
San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes
California's Santa Benito County has passed an ordinance banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes to combat youth smoking.

Under the leadership of many counties in California, the San Benito County Board of Supervisors recently passed an ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco in response to public health risks associated with youth smoking. This ban applies to all tobacco retailers in the county, including those in the Hollister and San Juan Bautista city limits. The five-member board unanimously voted to pass the ban on August 9th. The ordinance also prohibits the sale of disposable e-cigarettes countywide.


According to officials and the public from Hollister and San Benito County, the ban on flavored tobacco products has been in place for some time. County officials report that currently, 132 counties and cities in California have prohibited the sale of flavored tobacco products. Over the last few years, similar laws have been adopted in Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties. Nick Cullen, deputy director of public health for San Benito County, told the committee that the law passed on August 9 is "very similar" to the one implemented in Monterey County.


According to a report by county officials, the San Benito County Government Intergovernmental Committee - which includes representatives from the cities of Hollister and San Juan Bautista - has been at the forefront of efforts to control the impact of tobacco on the community. The committee members have been supportive of a ban on flavored tobacco products. County officials have noted that banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes is the "right thing to do" as these products are often blamed for the rise in smoking among children under the age of 18. The county's public health department has even made it a priority to ban these types of products.


There is overwhelming and indisputable evidence that teenagers prefer flavored tobacco," said Kollin Kosmicki, a member of the intergovernmental committee in charge. "It's time to do the right thing, at least to protect our children." According to county officials, data shows that the rate of tobacco use among teenagers in San Benito County is higher than the statewide average. Based on the 2017-18 California Health Kids Survey, 29% of 11th grade students in San Benito County have used e-cigarettes and 11% have smoked cigarettes; 16% of 9th grade students have used e-cigarettes and 5% have smoked cigarettes.


Officials in San Benito County report that nearly 32% of teenagers in the area have reported using e-cigarettes at least once in their lifetime. The county employees informed their supervisors that companies that produce and sell flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, little cigars, smokeless tobacco, and hookah tobacco, typically package and advertise their products in a way that appeals to children. The report goes on to state that on June 6th, public health officials worked with law enforcement and local youth in Hollister to conduct a "compliance check" at all 27 tobacco retailers in the area. In the sting operation, eight of the stores sold tobacco products to underage buyers without requesting identification to prove their age. Of those, six purchases were for flavored tobacco.


One possible solution to this problem, according to county officials, is to ban disposable e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products. "In San Benito County, over 60% of tobacco retailers sell flavored tobacco products, which could ultimately end up in the hands of our young people," the officials reported. "Among young people who have used tobacco, over 80% started with flavored tobacco products. By banning flavored tobacco products, this will help prevent youth tobacco use.


There are currently 38 licensed tobacco retailers in San Benito County. County officials report that this includes 27 in Hollister, four in San Juan Bautista, and seven in unincorporated areas. On August 9th, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that makes selling e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products illegal for any tobacco retailer. Retailers will now be held responsible for their employees' compliance with this regulation.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely for industry-related exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation capabilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original content. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully in line with the Chinese government's position on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
Germany's Magdeburg Main Customs Office seized 115,800 untaxed e-cigarettes containing a combined 4.366 million mL of e-liquid during four truck inspections between August 10 and September 4, 2026. The seizures prevented an estimated €1.397 million in tax losses and set a record for the customs office's jurisdiction. Criminal proceedings have been initiated against four truck drivers. The case follows a separate German investigation involving more than 7.6 million illicit vapes and an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses.
Enforcement
Oct.13
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
According to CBS Los Angeles on August 27, 2026, California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 762, which would phase out disposable, battery-embedded nicotine vapes in the state. If signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, manufacturing and importation of the covered products would be prohibited beginning January 1, 2027, followed by a sales ban on January 1, 2028. Driven primarily by concerns over electronic waste, lithium-battery fires and environmental pollution, the legislation would further shift California’s legal vape market toward rechargeable, refillable or replaceable-pod devices.
Aug.28
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia Tobacco Retail Permit Takes Effect October 1, Covering Vapes as More Than 3,000 Businesses Apply in September
Virginia's new retail tobacco permit system took effect October 1, requiring sellers of vapes, nicotine products and related devices and accessories to obtain a Retail Tobacco Permit for each business location. Virginia ABC said more than 3,000 businesses applied in September alone, creating a processing backlog. Qualifying applicants that filed before October 1 may temporarily operate under a Letter of Authorization. The new store-level permit also sits alongside Virginia's existing vape product directory, where sales of unlisted liquid nicotine or nicotine vapor products can trigger civil penalties starting at $5,000.
Regulations
Oct.03
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03