San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes

Aug.17.2022
San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes
California's Santa Benito County has passed an ordinance banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes to combat youth smoking.

Under the leadership of many counties in California, the San Benito County Board of Supervisors recently passed an ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco in response to public health risks associated with youth smoking. This ban applies to all tobacco retailers in the county, including those in the Hollister and San Juan Bautista city limits. The five-member board unanimously voted to pass the ban on August 9th. The ordinance also prohibits the sale of disposable e-cigarettes countywide.


According to officials and the public from Hollister and San Benito County, the ban on flavored tobacco products has been in place for some time. County officials report that currently, 132 counties and cities in California have prohibited the sale of flavored tobacco products. Over the last few years, similar laws have been adopted in Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties. Nick Cullen, deputy director of public health for San Benito County, told the committee that the law passed on August 9 is "very similar" to the one implemented in Monterey County.


According to a report by county officials, the San Benito County Government Intergovernmental Committee - which includes representatives from the cities of Hollister and San Juan Bautista - has been at the forefront of efforts to control the impact of tobacco on the community. The committee members have been supportive of a ban on flavored tobacco products. County officials have noted that banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes is the "right thing to do" as these products are often blamed for the rise in smoking among children under the age of 18. The county's public health department has even made it a priority to ban these types of products.


There is overwhelming and indisputable evidence that teenagers prefer flavored tobacco," said Kollin Kosmicki, a member of the intergovernmental committee in charge. "It's time to do the right thing, at least to protect our children." According to county officials, data shows that the rate of tobacco use among teenagers in San Benito County is higher than the statewide average. Based on the 2017-18 California Health Kids Survey, 29% of 11th grade students in San Benito County have used e-cigarettes and 11% have smoked cigarettes; 16% of 9th grade students have used e-cigarettes and 5% have smoked cigarettes.


Officials in San Benito County report that nearly 32% of teenagers in the area have reported using e-cigarettes at least once in their lifetime. The county employees informed their supervisors that companies that produce and sell flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, little cigars, smokeless tobacco, and hookah tobacco, typically package and advertise their products in a way that appeals to children. The report goes on to state that on June 6th, public health officials worked with law enforcement and local youth in Hollister to conduct a "compliance check" at all 27 tobacco retailers in the area. In the sting operation, eight of the stores sold tobacco products to underage buyers without requesting identification to prove their age. Of those, six purchases were for flavored tobacco.


One possible solution to this problem, according to county officials, is to ban disposable e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products. "In San Benito County, over 60% of tobacco retailers sell flavored tobacco products, which could ultimately end up in the hands of our young people," the officials reported. "Among young people who have used tobacco, over 80% started with flavored tobacco products. By banning flavored tobacco products, this will help prevent youth tobacco use.


There are currently 38 licensed tobacco retailers in San Benito County. County officials report that this includes 27 in Hollister, four in San Juan Bautista, and seven in unincorporated areas. On August 9th, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that makes selling e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products illegal for any tobacco retailer. Retailers will now be held responsible for their employees' compliance with this regulation.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely for industry-related exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation capabilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original content. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully in line with the Chinese government's position on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Reynolds Seeks to Join Altria Lawsuit Challenging FDA PMTA Rule and Calculation of 180-Day Deadline
Three R.J. Reynolds companies are seeking to intervene in a lawsuit filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY challenging the FDA's 2021 PMTA final rule. The companies dispute how the agency uses Acceptance and Filing reviews and completeness determinations to establish when the Tobacco Control Act's 180-day decision period begins. Reynolds has also linked prolonged PMTA reviews to competition from unauthorized vaping products. The FDA, meanwhile, has been accelerating reviews and reducing its backlog.
Sep.14
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
NAS 2026 | Cliff Douglas: Risk Continuum Should Play a Central Role in Tobacco Policy
Cliff Douglas, a veteran U.S. tobacco-control and public health policy figure, told NAS 2026 that the “continuum of risk” should play a central role in tobacco policy. He called for clearer market pathways, stronger risk communication, differentiated regulation and enforcement, and said possible FDA reforms to PMTA reviews could be a “welcome correction” if they create a more efficient, predictable route for scientifically substantiated lower-risk products. Read 2Firsts’ on-site coverage.
Sep.26
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
AIRSCREAM’s production hub in the Czech Republic brings nicotine pouch manufacturing, e-liquid bottling, product documentation, warehousing and international logistics into one operation, giving brands and commercial partners a practical platform from which to launch, expand and enter new markets.
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
2Firsts Exclusive Analysis | RLX Q2 Revenue Rises 14.8%, Company Takes Control of Western European Distributor and Expands Multi-Category Strategy
business accounting for 68.5% of sales. A new controlling investment in a Western European distributor and plans to scale modern oral nicotine pouches point to a broader international strategy spanning channels and multiple product categories.
Special Report
Aug.14