San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes

Aug.17.2022
San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes
California's Santa Benito County has passed an ordinance banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes to combat youth smoking.

Under the leadership of many counties in California, the San Benito County Board of Supervisors recently passed an ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco in response to public health risks associated with youth smoking. This ban applies to all tobacco retailers in the county, including those in the Hollister and San Juan Bautista city limits. The five-member board unanimously voted to pass the ban on August 9th. The ordinance also prohibits the sale of disposable e-cigarettes countywide.


According to officials and the public from Hollister and San Benito County, the ban on flavored tobacco products has been in place for some time. County officials report that currently, 132 counties and cities in California have prohibited the sale of flavored tobacco products. Over the last few years, similar laws have been adopted in Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties. Nick Cullen, deputy director of public health for San Benito County, told the committee that the law passed on August 9 is "very similar" to the one implemented in Monterey County.


According to a report by county officials, the San Benito County Government Intergovernmental Committee - which includes representatives from the cities of Hollister and San Juan Bautista - has been at the forefront of efforts to control the impact of tobacco on the community. The committee members have been supportive of a ban on flavored tobacco products. County officials have noted that banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes is the "right thing to do" as these products are often blamed for the rise in smoking among children under the age of 18. The county's public health department has even made it a priority to ban these types of products.


There is overwhelming and indisputable evidence that teenagers prefer flavored tobacco," said Kollin Kosmicki, a member of the intergovernmental committee in charge. "It's time to do the right thing, at least to protect our children." According to county officials, data shows that the rate of tobacco use among teenagers in San Benito County is higher than the statewide average. Based on the 2017-18 California Health Kids Survey, 29% of 11th grade students in San Benito County have used e-cigarettes and 11% have smoked cigarettes; 16% of 9th grade students have used e-cigarettes and 5% have smoked cigarettes.


Officials in San Benito County report that nearly 32% of teenagers in the area have reported using e-cigarettes at least once in their lifetime. The county employees informed their supervisors that companies that produce and sell flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, little cigars, smokeless tobacco, and hookah tobacco, typically package and advertise their products in a way that appeals to children. The report goes on to state that on June 6th, public health officials worked with law enforcement and local youth in Hollister to conduct a "compliance check" at all 27 tobacco retailers in the area. In the sting operation, eight of the stores sold tobacco products to underage buyers without requesting identification to prove their age. Of those, six purchases were for flavored tobacco.


One possible solution to this problem, according to county officials, is to ban disposable e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products. "In San Benito County, over 60% of tobacco retailers sell flavored tobacco products, which could ultimately end up in the hands of our young people," the officials reported. "Among young people who have used tobacco, over 80% started with flavored tobacco products. By banning flavored tobacco products, this will help prevent youth tobacco use.


There are currently 38 licensed tobacco retailers in San Benito County. County officials report that this includes 27 in Hollister, four in San Juan Bautista, and seven in unincorporated areas. On August 9th, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that makes selling e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products illegal for any tobacco retailer. Retailers will now be held responsible for their employees' compliance with this regulation.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely for industry-related exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation capabilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original content. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully in line with the Chinese government's position on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
German Bundestag Passes Tobacco Tax Hikes: Vape Liquid Duty to Reach €0.44/ml, Heated Tobacco Taxes to Rise and Cigarettes Seen Near €12 a Pack
Germany's Bundestag passed amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act on October 15, 2026, setting out annual excise tax increases from 2027 through 2030 for e-cigarette liquids, heated tobacco, cigarettes and other tobacco products. Under the Finance Committee's amended bill, duty on qualifying e-liquids will rise from €0.32/ml in 2026 to €0.44/ml in 2030, an increase of 37.5%. Heated tobacco will retain its tax calculation based on 80% of the corresponding cigarette excise duty. The average price of a 20-cigarette pack is projected to approach €12 by 2030, with some brands potentially reaching €14. The legislation is projected to generate approximately €11.8 billion in additional tax revenue over four years and remains subject to further legislative procedures.
Regulations
Oct.19
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
U.S. Health Groups Seek to Overturn FDA Enforcement Discretion for Pending PMTAs as Altria's Helix, NJOY and AVM Move to Intervene
American Vapor Manufacturers (AVM) and Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY filed separate motions on October 7, 2026, seeking to intervene on the FDA's side in a lawsuit challenging its enforcement guidance for certain e-cigarette and nicotine pouch products with pending premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs). Seven public health and tobacco-control organizations, including the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, sued the agency in July to overturn the policy. AVM argues that vacating the guidance could disrupt orders, inventory, retail distribution and investments in regulatory submissions.
Regulations
Oct.09
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
Product | DOJO Launches 0+6ml BLAST7K Fresh in UK in September, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility Ahead of October Per-Milliliter Vaping Duty
DOJO officially launched the BLAST7K Fresh on September 17, 2026, introducing a UK-market prefilled pod product with 6ml of e-liquid and a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 7,000 puffs. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, the INSTA-JUICED structure and COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology, while retaining compatibility with existing BLAST pods. The launch comes less than two weeks before the UK's Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1. At the new duty rate, 6ml of vaping liquid would correspond to £1.32 in VPD. DOJO has not stated that the product's 6ml format was designed in response to the new duty.
Sep.20
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Bret Koplow said the PMTA pathway is “predicated on tobacco harm reduction.” He outlined four CTP priorities: youth prevention, helping adults quit or switch to lower-risk products, improving relative-risk communication, and reducing unauthorized products. Koplow also addressed flavored e-cigarettes, public risk perceptions, industry credibility and efforts to make PMTA reviews more efficient and predictable.
Sep.26
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives