San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes

Aug.17.2022
San Benito County Bans Flavored Tobacco and Disposable E-Cigarettes
California's Santa Benito County has passed an ordinance banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes to combat youth smoking.

Under the leadership of many counties in California, the San Benito County Board of Supervisors recently passed an ordinance banning the sale of flavored tobacco in response to public health risks associated with youth smoking. This ban applies to all tobacco retailers in the county, including those in the Hollister and San Juan Bautista city limits. The five-member board unanimously voted to pass the ban on August 9th. The ordinance also prohibits the sale of disposable e-cigarettes countywide.


According to officials and the public from Hollister and San Benito County, the ban on flavored tobacco products has been in place for some time. County officials report that currently, 132 counties and cities in California have prohibited the sale of flavored tobacco products. Over the last few years, similar laws have been adopted in Monterey, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz counties. Nick Cullen, deputy director of public health for San Benito County, told the committee that the law passed on August 9 is "very similar" to the one implemented in Monterey County.


According to a report by county officials, the San Benito County Government Intergovernmental Committee - which includes representatives from the cities of Hollister and San Juan Bautista - has been at the forefront of efforts to control the impact of tobacco on the community. The committee members have been supportive of a ban on flavored tobacco products. County officials have noted that banning flavored tobacco and disposable e-cigarettes is the "right thing to do" as these products are often blamed for the rise in smoking among children under the age of 18. The county's public health department has even made it a priority to ban these types of products.


There is overwhelming and indisputable evidence that teenagers prefer flavored tobacco," said Kollin Kosmicki, a member of the intergovernmental committee in charge. "It's time to do the right thing, at least to protect our children." According to county officials, data shows that the rate of tobacco use among teenagers in San Benito County is higher than the statewide average. Based on the 2017-18 California Health Kids Survey, 29% of 11th grade students in San Benito County have used e-cigarettes and 11% have smoked cigarettes; 16% of 9th grade students have used e-cigarettes and 5% have smoked cigarettes.


Officials in San Benito County report that nearly 32% of teenagers in the area have reported using e-cigarettes at least once in their lifetime. The county employees informed their supervisors that companies that produce and sell flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, little cigars, smokeless tobacco, and hookah tobacco, typically package and advertise their products in a way that appeals to children. The report goes on to state that on June 6th, public health officials worked with law enforcement and local youth in Hollister to conduct a "compliance check" at all 27 tobacco retailers in the area. In the sting operation, eight of the stores sold tobacco products to underage buyers without requesting identification to prove their age. Of those, six purchases were for flavored tobacco.


One possible solution to this problem, according to county officials, is to ban disposable e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products. "In San Benito County, over 60% of tobacco retailers sell flavored tobacco products, which could ultimately end up in the hands of our young people," the officials reported. "Among young people who have used tobacco, over 80% started with flavored tobacco products. By banning flavored tobacco products, this will help prevent youth tobacco use.


There are currently 38 licensed tobacco retailers in San Benito County. County officials report that this includes 27 in Hollister, four in San Juan Bautista, and seven in unincorporated areas. On August 9th, the Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that makes selling e-cigarettes and flavored tobacco products illegal for any tobacco retailer. Retailers will now be held responsible for their employees' compliance with this regulation.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry communication and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely for industry-related exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation capabilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original content. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully in line with the Chinese government's position on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
UK HMRC Urges Public to Report Suspicious Vape Shops in Crackdown on Tax Fraud, Money Laundering and Illicit Tobacco Sales
HM Revenue & Customs is urging members of the public to report vape shops, barber shops and other high-street businesses suspected of tax fraud, money laundering or other illegal activity, with informants not required to provide personal details. HMRC plans more than 30,000 interventions in 2026-27 targeting tax fraud, organised crime and illicit activity, including the sale of illegal vapes and tobacco. The push forms part of a broader UK effort to tackle organised crime on high streets, backed by a £30 million government enforcement programme.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
BAT Regional Director Fred Monteiro Supports Spain’s Nicotine Rules but Opposes 0.99mg Nicotine Pouch Limit
Spanish newspaper El Confidencial interviewed Fred Monteiro, Regional Director for Americas and Europe at British American Tobacco (BAT). Monteiro said BAT supports setting regulatory limits for nicotine products but opposes Spain’s proposed 0.99mg nicotine-per-pouch limit, arguing that such a restriction could affect adult smokers’ transition to alternatives. He said nicotine regulation should be based on scientific evidence and harm reduction principles. Monteiro also said smoke-free products now account for around 25% of BAT’s Americas and Europe business and nearly 30% of its Europe business
BAT
Jul.30