Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027

News
Jun.26
Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027
The Scottish Government plans to remove business rates relief from vape shops from April 1, 2027, saying the measure is intended to ensure vape retailers contribute to the high street and align rates relief with public health commitments, while the impact on convenience stores that sell vaping products remains unclear.

Key Points

  • Scotland plans to remove vape shop rates relief.
  • The change is planned for April 1, 2027.
  • The government cited public health alignment.
  • Convenience store impact remains unclear.

2Firsts

June 25, 2026 — According to STV News, Scottish Grocer and Scottish Local Retailer, the Scottish Government plans to remove business rates relief from vape shops from April 1, 2027. If implemented, the policy would exclude specialist vape shops from some non-domestic rates relief schemes and add further operating-cost pressure to offline vape retailers.

Vape Shops to Lose Relief

Deputy First Minister Jenny Gilruth announced that the government plans to make vape businesses exempt from rates relief from April 1, 2027. She said ministers had heard concerns from businesses and trade bodies about apparent anomalies in the 2026 non-domestic property revaluation and would take urgent action.

Gilruth said the measures include ensuring that vape shops contribute to the high street, recognizing the sector’s growth in recent years and ensuring that rates relief aligns with the government’s public health commitments.

Business rates in Scotland, also known as non-domestic rates, are set by the Scottish Government and collected by councils to help fund public services. The amount is usually calculated based on a property’s rental value and multiplied by a nationally set tax rate.

Under the current system, reliefs such as Fresh Start and the Small Business Bonus Scheme can allow some businesses to receive up to 100% tax relief. Payday lending businesses, car parks and betting shops are already unable to apply for relief. If vape shops are added to the exclusion list, they would become another high-street business category unable to access such relief.

Convenience Store Impact Unclear

Scottish Grocer reported that the Scottish Government has not confirmed how the policy will affect convenience stores that stock vaping products, or whether such stores could lose rates discounts because they sell vapes.

That point matters for Scotland’s retail sector. Vaping products are sold not only through specialist vape shops, but also through convenience stores, independent retailers and small community shops. If the policy applies only to specialist vape shops, the impact will be concentrated on dedicated retailers. If it extends to mixed retailers that sell vaping products, the affected base could become much larger.

From a business perspective, the key question is how a “vape shop” will be defined. Regulators may need to clarify whether eligibility will be judged by business registration, primary trade, sales share, store display, or simply whether a shop sells vaping products.

For convenience stores and mixed retailers, uncertainty could affect merchandising, inventory and long-term category planning. If selling vaping products creates a risk of losing rates relief, some retailers may reassess the category’s margin contribution and compliance cost.

Tax Burden as a New Regulatory Pressure

The proposal is also linked to wider reform of Scotland’s non-domestic rates system. The Scottish Government said it will appoint an independent panel to review reported inconsistencies in the 2026 non-domestic property revaluation. The panel will identify possible anomalies and report its findings to Parliament.

Gilruth said the government will also examine broader improvements and reforms to the non-domestic rates system, seek independent advice and work closely with business to improve clarity, confidence, incentive and transparency.

For the vaping industry, the proposal shows that regulatory pressure is moving from the product level to the retail and tax level. The UK and Scottish vape markets have already faced changes including the single-use vape ban, product sales restrictions, advertising controls and youth-protection requirements. If specialist vape shops also lose rates relief, the profitability of physical stores will face additional pressure.

The measure also shows that the Scottish Government is bringing public health objectives into business rates relief policy. Vape retailers have already been affected by product safety rules, age-verification requirements, illicit-product enforcement and environmental policy. In future, store-level taxation, high-street contribution and sector growth may also become policy factors.

Three issues should be watched next: whether the Scottish Government clarifies the scope of “vape shops”; whether convenience stores and mixed retailers are included in the exclusion; and whether trade bodies challenge the removal of relief, the revaluation process or the broader cost pressure on retailers.

 

Follow 2Firsts for the latest updates on global tobacco harm reduction, nicotine products and regulatory developments.

Cover image: Scottish Grocer

Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23