Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027

News
Jun.26
Scotland Plans to Remove Business Rates Relief From Vape Shops From 2027
The Scottish Government plans to remove business rates relief from vape shops from April 1, 2027, saying the measure is intended to ensure vape retailers contribute to the high street and align rates relief with public health commitments, while the impact on convenience stores that sell vaping products remains unclear.

Key Points

  • Scotland plans to remove vape shop rates relief.
  • The change is planned for April 1, 2027.
  • The government cited public health alignment.
  • Convenience store impact remains unclear.

2Firsts

June 25, 2026 — According to STV News, Scottish Grocer and Scottish Local Retailer, the Scottish Government plans to remove business rates relief from vape shops from April 1, 2027. If implemented, the policy would exclude specialist vape shops from some non-domestic rates relief schemes and add further operating-cost pressure to offline vape retailers.

Vape Shops to Lose Relief

Deputy First Minister Jenny Gilruth announced that the government plans to make vape businesses exempt from rates relief from April 1, 2027. She said ministers had heard concerns from businesses and trade bodies about apparent anomalies in the 2026 non-domestic property revaluation and would take urgent action.

Gilruth said the measures include ensuring that vape shops contribute to the high street, recognizing the sector’s growth in recent years and ensuring that rates relief aligns with the government’s public health commitments.

Business rates in Scotland, also known as non-domestic rates, are set by the Scottish Government and collected by councils to help fund public services. The amount is usually calculated based on a property’s rental value and multiplied by a nationally set tax rate.

Under the current system, reliefs such as Fresh Start and the Small Business Bonus Scheme can allow some businesses to receive up to 100% tax relief. Payday lending businesses, car parks and betting shops are already unable to apply for relief. If vape shops are added to the exclusion list, they would become another high-street business category unable to access such relief.

Convenience Store Impact Unclear

Scottish Grocer reported that the Scottish Government has not confirmed how the policy will affect convenience stores that stock vaping products, or whether such stores could lose rates discounts because they sell vapes.

That point matters for Scotland’s retail sector. Vaping products are sold not only through specialist vape shops, but also through convenience stores, independent retailers and small community shops. If the policy applies only to specialist vape shops, the impact will be concentrated on dedicated retailers. If it extends to mixed retailers that sell vaping products, the affected base could become much larger.

From a business perspective, the key question is how a “vape shop” will be defined. Regulators may need to clarify whether eligibility will be judged by business registration, primary trade, sales share, store display, or simply whether a shop sells vaping products.

For convenience stores and mixed retailers, uncertainty could affect merchandising, inventory and long-term category planning. If selling vaping products creates a risk of losing rates relief, some retailers may reassess the category’s margin contribution and compliance cost.

Tax Burden as a New Regulatory Pressure

The proposal is also linked to wider reform of Scotland’s non-domestic rates system. The Scottish Government said it will appoint an independent panel to review reported inconsistencies in the 2026 non-domestic property revaluation. The panel will identify possible anomalies and report its findings to Parliament.

Gilruth said the government will also examine broader improvements and reforms to the non-domestic rates system, seek independent advice and work closely with business to improve clarity, confidence, incentive and transparency.

For the vaping industry, the proposal shows that regulatory pressure is moving from the product level to the retail and tax level. The UK and Scottish vape markets have already faced changes including the single-use vape ban, product sales restrictions, advertising controls and youth-protection requirements. If specialist vape shops also lose rates relief, the profitability of physical stores will face additional pressure.

The measure also shows that the Scottish Government is bringing public health objectives into business rates relief policy. Vape retailers have already been affected by product safety rules, age-verification requirements, illicit-product enforcement and environmental policy. In future, store-level taxation, high-street contribution and sector growth may also become policy factors.

Three issues should be watched next: whether the Scottish Government clarifies the scope of “vape shops”; whether convenience stores and mixed retailers are included in the exclusion; and whether trade bodies challenge the removal of relief, the revaluation process or the broader cost pressure on retailers.

 

Follow 2Firsts for the latest updates on global tobacco harm reduction, nicotine products and regulatory developments.

Cover image: Scottish Grocer

Germany Seizes 56 Pallets of Illegal Vapes, Probe Estimates €1.8 Million Tax Loss
Germany Seizes 56 Pallets of Illegal Vapes, Probe Estimates €1.8 Million Tax Loss
German authorities have seized dozens of pallets of illegal disposable vapes in a criminal investigation, with the products estimated to have caused at least €1.8 million in tax losses. The case has also raised concerns over cross-border supply chains linked to unauthorized nicotine products entering the European market.
Jul.14
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
Chinese authorities have disclosed the country’s first reported criminal case involving counterfeit vapes marketed as “medical nebulizers” and “zero-nicotine” products. Authorities determined that the products involved were counterfeit vapes and pursued criminal charges for producing and selling counterfeit goods. According to the report, the case resulted in the seizure of 347,000 counterfeit vape pods and 53,700 vape devices, with physical goods valued at 22.13 million yuan.
Aug.04
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13