Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent

Sep.02.2025
Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent
Singapore's Health Minister Ong Ye Kung defended the e-cigarette ban, noting that e-cigarette cartridges have far more nicotine than cigarettes and can equal four packs. His comments sparked criticism on social media, with users questioning his neglect of the harms of cigarette combustion by-products and suggesting the government prioritizes tobacco tax revenue. Many called for regulation instead of a total ban.

Key points:

 

·Minister's stance: Wang Yikang states that e-cigarette pods have extremely high nicotine content, with one pod equivalent to four packs of cigarettes, and are easy to use continuously throughout the day, posing a risk no lower than cigarettes. 

·Concern from youth: He emphasizes that e-cigarettes are more attractive to young people, and without e-cigarettes, many young people would not actively smoke cigarettes. 

·New regulations: Starting from September 1, 2025, Singapore will increase penalties for e-cigarettes and "Kpods," implementing heavy fines, imprisonment, and caning. 

·Public reaction: Wang Yikang's remarks have sparked a large amount of criticism, with netizens questioning the disregard for the dangers of cigarette combustion and suggesting that the government may be turning a blind eye to cigarette tax revenue. 

·International comparison: Some comments point out that the UK and New Zealand view e-cigarettes as harm reduction tools, while Singapore has chosen to completely ban them, lacking a scientific balance.

 


 

On September 2, 2025, the online citizen reported that Singapore's Health Minister, Ong Ye Kung, defended the ban on e-cigarettes, responding to public questions about why traditional cigarettes are legal while e-cigarettes are not. Ong Ye Kung stated that while some believe e-cigarettes are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, this is not actually the case.

 

He explained that cigarettes are consumed one by one, and some smokers may stop after finishing one cigarette. However, an e-cigarette pod can be used for a whole day or longer, increasing the risk of continuous use. According to the Health Sciences Authority of Singapore, the amount of nicotine in one e-cigarette pod is equivalent to four packs of cigarettes. Wang Yikang pointed out that someone who continuously uses an e-cigarette for a whole day is essentially smoking four packs of cigarettes.

 

He added that in Singapore, the smoking rate among young people is low, but the introduction of e-cigarettes has led some young people to start smoking. He firmly believes that without e-cigarettes, young people would not smoke, as cigarettes are neither fashionable nor have a pleasant smell for them.

 

Starting from September 1, 2025, Singapore will impose stricter penalties on the use and supply of e-cigarettes and Kpods. Under Singapore's Misuse of Drugs Act, the use of nicotine and its analogues will be reclassified as Class C drugs. The new measures include caning for sellers, increased fines, and mandatory rehabilitation for underage offenders.

 

Online, Wang Yikang's comments have sparked widespread criticism, with over 700 responses on Reddit and CNA's Facebook pages combined. Many internet users are expressing dissatisfaction with the reasons for continuing to allow cigarette sales while banning e-cigarettes. Some have pointed out that Wang Yikang mentioned smokers would stop after one cigarette, questioning whether he is aware of the phenomenon of chain smoking.

 

Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent
Image source: the online citizen

 

Some users mocked, "It's better to use marijuana, because there is no nicotine." Another user expressed hope that the Health Minister could provide a more forceful explanation, such as emphasizing the need for cigarette manufacturers to clearly list the ingredients in their products, while e-cigarettes do not require this and are susceptible to the addition of illegal substances. Some people believe that the government may not ban cigarettes due to their significant tax revenue. In 2024, a report by Singapore Customs stated that they received 1.1 billion Singapore dollars (around 800 million USD) in tobacco tax.

 

Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent
Image source: the online citizen

 

Some netizens suggest that instead of banning e-cigarettes, it would be more effective to regulate them properly. "Banning e-cigarettes will lead to a surge in traditional cigarette use, including some former smokers going back to smoking," one person commented. "We should regulate e-cigarettes in the same way as traditional cigarettes.

 

Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent
Image source: the online citizen

 

A user criticized that while Wang Yikang's defense of the e-cigarette ban may sound reasonable politically, it appears shallow when viewed from a scientific perspective. Although e-cigarettes are appealing to young people and some pods contain high levels of nicotine, the user objected to Wang Yikang emphasizing the issue of nicotine while overlooking the fact that traditional cigarettes contain more harmful tar, carbon monoxide, and other combustion byproducts.

 

Some users have pointed out that this is why the UK and New Zealand classify e-cigarettes as less harmful alternatives. "Minister Wong has ignored existing research by equating nicotine content with overall harm," the comment continued, adding that Singapore's policy overlooks adult users who use e-cigarettes as harm reduction tools. "Public health policies should not only be reassuring but also reflect the complete evidence.

 

Singapore's Health Minister Responds to Queries on Legal Cigarettes and Banned E-cigarettes, Drawing Public Discontent
Image source: The online citizen

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Says It Will Not Take Enforcement Action Against Zone Nicotine Pouches Until Lawsuit Is Resolved
FDA Says It Will Not Take Enforcement Action Against Zone Nicotine Pouches Until Lawsuit Is Resolved
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has told vape manufacturer Fontem US that it does not presently intend to take enforcement action against the company’s Zone nicotine pouches while litigation over the agency’s handling of the application remains unresolved.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ITC Keeps Exclusion and Cease-and-Desist Orders in Place Against Stiiizy
ITC Keeps Exclusion and Cease-and-Desist Orders in Place Against Stiiizy
U.S. International Trade Commission has refused to pause the import and sales bans imposed on cannabis vape company Stiiizy while it appeals the agency’s patent infringement ruling in its dispute with Pax Labs.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS submitted a comment letter to USTR in a proceeding examining unfair trade practices worldwide. The letter focuses on illicit nicotine products made in China and shipped to the United States in violation of U.S. law. NACS said the U.S. electronic nicotine delivery systems market has become dominated by illicit products, mainly disposable e-cigarettes manufactured in China and sold without the marketing authorization required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Apr.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas says newly released internal FDA records show agency scientific reviewers supported authorization for several flavored G2 products before senior leadership halted them. According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, FDA’s Office of Science first recommended marketing authorization for all eight products in December 2025 and later supported six of them in February 2026. FDA ultimately authorized only the G2 device and one tobacco-flavored pod in March.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
Exclusive | China Starts Mandatory National Standards Process for Heated Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches
China has launched mandatory national standards work for heated cigarettes and nicotine pouches, further formalizing regulation of both categories. The move may help lay groundwork for future market entry, but does not signal imminent domestic commercialization.
Apr.15