Spain May Set Further Restrictions on The Sale and Distribution of Vapes

RegulationsMarket
Jul.05.2022
The Ministry of Health is looking into banning online sales of vaping products, and limit sales to specialized tobacco shops.

The Royal Decree 579/2017, is the legislation pertaining to the manufacture, advertising and sale of vaping products in Spain. The decree basically translates the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) into Spanish regulations, and has been effective since the 11th of June 2017.

Spain May Set Further Restrictions on The Sale and Distribution of Vapes

And now, says Euro Weekly, the Spanish Government has set out to put further restrictions on the sale and distribution of e-cigarettes, with the Ministry of Health saying that they aim to reformulate the local anti-smoking legislation and extend it to the use of e-cigarettes, as they cause “harmful short-term effects”.

 

Led by Carolina Darias, the ministry said they are concerned about the sale of the devices, as “there is a large number of websites where nicotine-based devices can be bought online, and the methods for preventing access to minors are neither sufficient nor effective.” To this effect, they are looking into banning online sales of vaping products, and limit sales to specialised tobacco shops.

 

A general e-liquid tax is proposed

 

Similarly last year, Spain’s Ministry of Finance said it wanted to tighten the tobacco regulatory framework, so as to be in line with WHO and EU TPD standards. The umbrella organisation- the National Committee for the Prevention of Smoking (Comité Nacional para la Prevención del Tabaquismo (CNPT) had prepared a report for the Ministry of Health suggesting an excise duty based on both volume of e-liquid and nicotine content.

 

The report proposed a general e-liquid tax at the EU average rate of €0.15 per ml, with an additional element for nicotine content at €0.006 per mg. The group said that with an average tax rate of 35.6%, the Spanish government could collect €35m in revenue a year from the tax. “This is a viable option for the Spanish economy,” said a CNPT spokesperson to ECigIntelligence. “The government would obtain an economic return, while at the same time promoting a reduction in the consumption of these products.”

 

Commenting on the proposed tax, ECigIntelligence has recently highlighted that if the Spanish government indeed agrees to the tax, the local vape industry would be deeply impacted. The agency believes that the CNPT’s proposal is currently being discussed internally between the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Finance.

 

The content excerpted or reproduced in this article comes from a third-party, and the copyright belongs to the original media and author. If any infringement is found, please contact us to delete it. Any entity or individual wishing to forward the information, please contact the author and refrain from forwarding directly from here.

PMI’s ZYN Launches Loyalty Platform in Mexico, Tapping World Cup Viewing Scenes for Nicotine Pouch Marketing
PMI’s ZYN Launches Loyalty Platform in Mexico, Tapping World Cup Viewing Scenes for Nicotine Pouch Marketing
PMI’s nicotine pouch brand ZYN has launched the ZYN Club loyalty platform in Mexico and introduced ZYN Live Stadium viewing experiences around football matches, showing how nicotine pouch brands are using rewards, limited benefits and offline consumption settings to reach adult consumers.
Jun.29
 BAT Bangladesh Cigarette Sales Fall 14%, Q1 Profit Drops 34%
BAT Bangladesh Cigarette Sales Fall 14%, Q1 Profit Drops 34%
British American Tobacco Bangladesh reported a 14% year-on-year decline in cigarette sales volume and a 34% drop in first-quarter profit, highlighting mounting pressure from inflation, taxation, and weakening consumer spending in Bangladesh.
News
May.18
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Special Report|U.S.-Facing Retailer Lists RELX Creator Pro 15K: A Chinese Brand Signal Under FDA’s Lower-Priority Enforcement Window
Vapesourcing has listed RELX Creator Pro 15K as “Coming Soon” with U.S. warehouse shipping options; while the page does not show that RELX has entered the U.S. market through official channels or that the product has received FDA authorization, the listing suggests that Chinese brand-led ENDS products are becoming a new point of observation as the U.S. market reassesses regulatory risk following the FDA’s updated enforcement-priority policy.
Industry Insight
Jun.11
Philippine Health Department Pushes Total Vape Ban, With Tobacco-Only Flavor Limit as Alternative
Philippine Health Department Pushes Total Vape Ban, With Tobacco-Only Flavor Limit as Alternative
The Philippine Department of Health said it is pushing for a total ban on vape products. If a full ban is not feasible, DOH officer-in-charge Director Dr. Dominic Maddumba said vape products should at least be limited to plain tobacco flavors to reduce their appeal to minors.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia’s Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim said duties and taxes on nicotine-containing vape products will be determined in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling on whether liquid or gel nicotine can be exempted from the Poisons List under the Poisons Act 1952, a case that could affect the legal basis for vape taxation, retail sales and future ban policy.
Jun.29