US experts urge balanced approach to regulating e-cigarettes.

Sep.09.2022
US tobacco control experts call for balanced regulation of e-cigarettes, aiming to prevent youth use while promoting adult cessation.

Four tobacco control experts in the United States are calling for a more balanced approach to regulating electronic cigarettes.


In an article entitled "Proposal for the American E-Cigarette Policy Agenda: Products, Prices, Locations, and Promotions", the author observes that many Americans are confused about the relative dangers of nicotine use. Public information about this substance often emphasizes preventing youth use rather than helping adults quit smoking.


According to a paper authored by Kenneth Warner and his colleagues Cliff Douglas and Karalyn Kiessling at the University of Michigan, the United States' policies regarding electronic cigarettes are focusing primarily on measures aimed at reducing youth vaping, such as taxing and restricting flavors.


Unfortunately, some measures may have unintended consequences. For example, reducing taxes on e-cigarettes to decrease teenage use may actually increase smoking rates among children if it is not matched with comparable increases in tobacco taxes. Likewise, some youth-focused taxes appear to be reducing adult e-cigarette use, increasing smoking rates, and decreasing quit attempts. It is critical to develop policies that achieve the dual goal of preventing teen e-cigarette use and increasing adult smoking cessation.


The author advocates for the imposition of significant consumption taxes on cigarettes and other combustible tobacco products by both state and federal governments, and for more moderate consumption taxes to be levied on electronic cigarettes.


Disclaimer: 1. This article is compiled from third-party information and is only for exchange and learning within the industry. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, nor can 2FIRSTS confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is only for exchange and research within the industry. 3. Due to limited compiling skills, the compiled article may not fully express the same meaning as the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy. 4. For any statements or positions related to domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign affairs, 2FIRSTS fully supports the Chinese government. 5. The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.