US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute

Jan.23.2025
US Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on RJR Vapor-FDA Dispute
Tobacco Reporter: US Supreme Court hears oral arguments between RJR Vapor and FDA over jurisdictional issue.

According to a report from Tobacco Reporter on January 21st, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday (21st) between British American Tobacco subsidiary RJR Vapor and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).


The FDA claims that the Tobacco Control Act allows cases to be tried in the District of Columbia Circuit Court, the jurisdiction where the plaintiff is located, or their primary place of business. However, the British-American Tobacco subsidiary, RJR Vapor, is attempting to challenge the FDA in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Louisiana.


RJR Vapor has teamed up with retailer Avail Vapor in Texas and a convenience store association in Mississippi that sells RJR products to submit a request for a review. Both states are in the Fifth Circuit.


The North Carolina headquarters of RJR Vapor falls under the Fourth Circuit, where an appeal against the FDA's rejection of their application has been dismissed. The Fifth Circuit Court had criticized the FDA for making it nearly impossible for companies to comply with regulations, calling it a "needle in a haystack" situation. RJR Vapor and retailers argue that regulations allow "any adversely affected person" to challenge the FDA, including retailers in the Fifth Circuit who may face closure risks due to selling Vuse products.


In 2016, the FDA rejected RJR Vapor's application, stating that the product was "not appropriate for protecting public health." The FDA believed that their decision primarily targeted manufacturers and had an indirect and insignificant impact on retailers. Allowing this case to be heard in the Fifth Circuit could potentially lead to regulatory evasion and encourage "forum shopping.


As a result, the FDA has filed a petition with the Supreme Court to review the case, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear it in October 2024. RJR Vapor argues that the Supreme Court does not have the authority to rule on such a "non-final" case and hopes that it will be dismissed while still pending.


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal is among the countries opposing the UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which would ban tobacco sales to people born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. According to the report, Portugal, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Slovakia and Romania have submitted reasoned opinions and formal observations to Brussels, arguing that the bill breaches post-Brexit arrangements including the Windsor Framework.
Apr.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Belgian Health Minister Calls Tobacco Industry “Criminal” After Court Undermines Supermarket Sales Ban
Belgian Health Minister Calls Tobacco Industry “Criminal” After Court Undermines Supermarket Sales Ban
Belgian Health Minister Frank Vandenbroucke described the tobacco industry as a “criminal” sector with “no future” during an appearance on VRT’s current affairs program Ter Zake. His comments came after Belgium’s Constitutional Court ruled that a government ban on cigarette and vape sales in supermarkets was discriminatory because it allowed small shops to sell tobacco products while prohibiting larger retailers from doing so.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
IMF Article Sets Out Three Principles: Cover All Harmful Products, Match Tax Rates to Harm, Improve Cross-Border Coordination
IMF Article Sets Out Three Principles: Cover All Harmful Products, Match Tax Rates to Harm, Improve Cross-Border Coordination
A March 2026 article in Finance & Development, “Taxing Harmful Habits,” argues that taxes on harmful products such as tobacco, alcohol and sugary drinks should better reflect the health harm they cause. The authors propose three principles: capture all harmful products, align tax rates with health harm, and strengthen cross-border coordination to reduce evasion and smuggling.
Mar.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris International Says Part of Owensboro ZYN Output Is Exceeding Market Demand
Philip Morris International Says Part of Owensboro ZYN Output Is Exceeding Market Demand
Philip Morris International said its Swedish Match facility in Owensboro will adjust part of its production schedule this summer in response to changing market conditions. According to a notice the company gave union leadership and employees on April 22, parts of ZYN production will shift from a 24/7 schedule back to a 24/5 schedule. The ZYN Flagship department will return to a five-day, three-shift operation.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Exhibition Insights | Geek Bar Booth Shows Two Fasoul Heat-Not-Burn Devices in Prague
Exhibition Insights | Geek Bar Booth Shows Two Fasoul Heat-Not-Burn Devices in Prague
At EVO NXT 2026 in Prague, the Geek Bar booth displayed two Fasoul heat-not-burn devices, Q1 Pro and C2. One stressed compact size, screen-led control and dual modes, while the other highlighted faster heating, a larger battery and added functions. Both were presented as compatible with IQOS TEREA and SENTIA sticks. Materials on a website displaying Fasoul-related information also show recent market activity in Japan and Italy.
Apr.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Azerbaijan Cancels E-Cigarette State Standard as Full Vape Ban Takes Effect on April 1
Azerbaijan Cancels E-Cigarette State Standard as Full Vape Ban Takes Effect on April 1
The Azerbaijan Institute of Standardization (AZSTAND) has announced the cancellation of state standard AZS 941:2023, “Electronic Cigarettes. General Technical Specifications.”Under legal amendments adopted on December 30, 2025, Azerbaijan has prohibited from April 1, 2026 the import, export, manufacture, storage, wholesale and retail sale, and use of e-cigarettes and their components.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai