JUUL Labs Accuses NJOY and Altria of Patent Infringement; U.S. ITC Launches Section 337 Investigation

Sep.11.2025
JUUL Labs Accuses NJOY and Altria of Patent Infringement; U.S. ITC Launches Section 337 Investigation
The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has instituted an investigation titled Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof (II) based on a complaint by JUUL Labs, Inc. JUUL alleges that NJOY, its parent and affiliates at Altria Group, infringed U.S. Patent No. 12,156,533 through the importation and sale of certain ENDS devices, cartridges, and components. JUUL seeks a limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders. Respondents must answer within 20 d

Key Points

 

  • Investigation No.: 337-TA-1460; Institution Date: September 9, 2025.
  • Patent & Claims at Issue: U.S. Patent No. 12,156,533, claims 1–8 and 10.
  • Complainant: JUUL Labs, Inc. (Washington, D.C.).
  • Respondents: NJOY, LLC; NJOY Holdings, Inc.; Altria Group, Inc.; Altria Group Distribution Company; Altria Client Services LLC.
  • Accused Products (plain description): Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) / vaporizer devices, companion cartridges and parts (including cartridge housings, nicotine-salt e-liquids, heating elements/atomizers, chargers, batteries), and subcomponents.
  • Requested Relief: Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) and Cease-and-Desist Orders (C&D).
  • Procedure: A USITC Administrative Law Judge will conduct the hearing; the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) is not participating as a party.
  • Response Deadline: Respondents must file answers within 20 days of service. Failure to respond to each allegation may result in default and issuance of exclusion and/or cease-and-desist orders.

 


 

2Firsts, September 10, 2025 — The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has issued a Notice of Institution initiating an investigation in Certain Vaporizer Devices, Cartridges Used Therewith, and Components Thereof (II) following a complaint filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. under Section 337 of the Tariff Act.

 

Complainant:

 

JUUL Labs, Inc.

 

 

Respondents:

 

NJOY, LLC

NJOY Holdings, Inc.

Altria Group, Inc.

Altria Group Distribution Company

Altria Client Services LLC

 

 

According to the notice, JUUL’s August 8, 2025 complaint alleges that respondents’ products, in the importation, sale for importation, or post-importation sale within the United States, infringe U.S. Patent No. 12,156,533 (the “‘533 patent”), specifically claims 1–8 and 10.

 

The USITC defines the scope of investigation in plain terms to include ENDS/vaporizer devices, their cartridges, and related components (such as cartridge housings, nicotine-salt e-liquids, heating elements/atomizers, chargers, batteries) as well as subcomponents.

 

JUUL requests that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order barring infringing products from entry into the United States and cease-and-desist orders against named domestic respondents.

 

The Commission’s Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign an ALJ to conduct proceedings. The USITC’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) will not participate as a party in this matter.

 

Per the notice, respondents must file an answer within 20 days of service addressing each allegation in the complaint and the notice of investigation. Failure to do so may be deemed a waiver of the right to appear and contest, enabling the ALJ and Commission to make findings of fact and issue initial and final determinations that could result in exclusion and/or cease-and-desist orders.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Vietnam Drafts Administrative Penalties for E-Cigarette Use, Setting Fines up to USD 380
Vietnam Drafts Administrative Penalties for E-Cigarette Use, Setting Fines up to USD 380
Vietnam plans to formalise penalties for e-cigarette and heated tobacco use under a draft decree. Individual users could be fined VND 3–5 million (USD 114–190), while premises allowing use face fines up to VND 10 million (USD 380). Higher penalties apply to business violations.
Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China’s Tobacco Regulator Moves to Introduce Credit Management Framework for E-Cigarette Manufacturers, Greater Transparency May Improve International Assessability of China’s Supply Chain
China’s Tobacco Regulator Moves to Introduce Credit Management Framework for E-Cigarette Manufacturers, Greater Transparency May Improve International Assessability of China’s Supply Chain
China’s tobacco regulator has moved to introduce a credit management framework for e-cigarette manufacturers, outlining a system that links compliance records to regulatory oversight. The proposal forms part of a broader push to institutionalize supervision and improve transparency across China’s e-cigarette supply chain.
Jan.05
GEEKBAR Announces Restock on Social Media, Pulse and Pulse X Lines Back in Stock
GEEKBAR Announces Restock on Social Media, Pulse and Pulse X Lines Back in Stock
GEEKBAR has announced a new round of restocking across multiple overseas social media platforms, bringing its flagship Pulse and Pulse X product lines back on sale, with several previously hard-to-find flavors returning simultaneously, alongside the launch of the new Thermal Edition.
Dec.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
Wisconsin Fines Vape Retailers Nearly $13 Million for Selling Unapproved Products
The state of Wisconsin has fined one retailer nearly USD 12.44 million and another USD 450,000 for violating the state’s new vape sales law, which took effect in September and restricts sales to an approved list of products.
Dec.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea Implements Public Tobacco Harmfulness Management Program, Including 22 Harmful Components in E-Cigarettes
South Korea Implements Public Tobacco Harmfulness Management Program, Including 22 Harmful Components in E-Cigarettes
South Korea’s Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety convened the first 2025 Tobacco Harmfulness Management Policy Committee, finalizing new lists of harmful substances for cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and liquid e-cigarettes to be publicly disclosed from next year.
Nov.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
UPC Court of Appeal refuses to revive VMR’s European vape patent, upholding lack of inventiveness
The Unified Patent Court’s Court of Appeal declined on Dec. 29 to revive a European patent held by VMR Products LLC, upholding a finding that the patent is not inventive over earlier devices. The decision said adding a window in the vape’s outer shell to reveal the internal cartridge holding vape liquid was an obvious, routine adaptation based on an earlier U.S. patent and general knowledge.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai