WHO's 2022 report on tobacco control in the Americas.

Sep.08.2022
WHO's 2022 report on tobacco control in the Americas.
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) released the 2022 tobacco control report, which fails to acknowledge the potential benefits of e-cigarettes.

The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), a subsidiary of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Americas, recently released the "2022 Report on Tobacco Control in the Americas." In it, once again, the WHO failed to acknowledge the potential role electronic cigarettes could play in reducing the harms caused by smoking.


In this nearly 150-page report, the World Health Organization dedicates an entire chapter to what it calls "novel nicotine and tobacco products," repeating myths that have already been debunked about e-cigarettes. The report suggests that the emergence and popularity of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) can be attributed to the fact that "tobacco control remains a priority and a challenge.


If the World Health Organization truly cares about controlling tobacco use and helping smokers quit, it should stop criminalizing electronic cigarette devices and promote their use as a smoking cessation aid. As evidenced by testimonies from quitters around the world, these devices are a part of the solution, not the cause of smoking as a continuing public health issue.


Additionally, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been accused of manipulating public opinion by attacking advocates of electronic cigarettes. They claim that terms such as "harm reduction" or "risk reduction" can be confusing and that there is no scientific evidence proving that consuming e-cigarettes - so-called reduced-risk products - is safe for health. However, no e-cigarette advocate has ever claimed that e-cigarettes are completely risk-free and that we should blindly use them. The WHO seems to misunderstand that scientific evidence shows that e-cigarettes are significantly less harmful than smoking, so the term "tobacco harm reduction" is entirely valid. Regardless of how the WHO tries to discredit it.


It appears that this is not enough, as the World Health Organization goes even further by daring to deny the use of ENDS as a smoking cessation aid. It explains that "these products are designed to exponentially reduce nicotine concentration over a specified period of time, but they are subject to less scrutiny by national authorities, so they cannot benefit from the same level of quality assurance as approved NRTs." This is not true.


As the name suggests, these devices are designed to safely consume nicotine rather than eliminate its consumption entirely. Additionally, nicotine has minimal health effects, as seen in other NRTs such as nicotine gum or patches, so why is it a concern with e-cigarettes?


Quitting smoking is a challenging task and it becomes even more difficult without help. Cold turkey methods often fail, and we cannot expect many smokers to quit overnight through sheer willpower. We know that when they try to quit, they experience withdrawal symptoms, and if they cannot overcome this, they may relapse.


Why not help smokers by providing them with safer and more effective ways to quit? E-cigarettes are 95% less harmful than smoking and the most effective method to quit smoking. Health organizations should stop assuming that smokers only have two options: quit or die. Instead, they should promote harm reduction overall, especially e-cigarettes as an aid to quitting smoking.


Statement


This article is compiled from information from a third party source and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


For any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan-related, or foreign-related expressions or stances, 2FIRSTS maintains full alignment with the Chinese government.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty (VPD), scheduled to take effect in October 2026, is prompting retailers to assess how different vape categories may be affected. UK retailer Vape HQ has estimated potential price changes under the new volume-based tax system, showing that 100ml shortfill e-liquids could see prices rise from around £12.99 to £39.39, a 203% increase, while 2ml prefilled pod vape kits could rise from £5.99 to £6.52, an increase of about 9%. The estimates highlight how a volume-based tax structure creates uneven cost impacts across product categories.
Aug.19