Arrests Made in Drug Trafficking Operation, Spain

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nov.29.2023
Arrests Made in Drug Trafficking Operation, Spain
10 men were recently arrested in the town of Alfaz de Pi, Spain, for allegedly selling drugs in a "social club".

According to a report from Cope on November 28th, ten men in the Spanish town of Alfaz de Pi have recently been arrested by the police for alleged drug dealing. They were conducting drug transactions at a location known as a "social club." The investigation revealed that this "social club" was exploiting its ambiguous legality to serve as a front for drug sales.

 

According to the authorities, it has been deduced through administrative measures and data collection that there exists some sort of social or club establishment in this area, and its operating license has been revoked by the government of Alphastepi City. Additionally, it has been discovered that individuals who purchase drugs here come from various age groups, including many tourists who are merely visiting the area. These individuals often arrive in different vehicles, and some even take taxis to reach this location.

 

All information was gathered and the police applied to the court for search and seizure of these two locations, ultimately confirming and apprehending ten male individuals involved in drug trafficking. They range in age from 24 to 37 years old and hail from the UK, Spain, France, Morocco, and the Netherlands.

 

In the end, the police succeeded in seizing over 4700 grams of marijuana, approximately 230 grams of marijuana leaves, and 155 hand-rolled cigarettes containing drugs. All apprehended suspects have been handed over to the Fourth Guiding Court in Benidorm for further legal proceedings.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Roanoke City Council Considers $20,000 Annual Fee for Vape Shops, Sparking Debate
Roanoke City Council Considers $20,000 Annual Fee for Vape Shops, Sparking Debate
ROANOKE, Virginia — August 11, 2025 — The Roanoke City Council is reviewing a proposal that would require vape shops whose primary business is selling e-cigarette products to pay an annual operating fee of $20,000. The measure would not apply to gas stations or convenience stores that also sell vaping products.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability) (Stock code: 6055) Voluntary Announcement Measures for the Administration of Tobacco Products in Domestic Duty-free Markets (Draft for Consultation)
China Tobacco International (HK) Company Limited (incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability) (Stock code: 6055) Voluntary Announcement Measures for the Administration of Tobacco Products in Domestic Duty-free Markets (Draft for Consultation)
Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement.
Jul.28
Product| ELFBAR BC Series Debuts 30,000-Puff Device with Interactive LEDs & Extended Battery
Product| ELFBAR BC Series Debuts 30,000-Puff Device with Interactive LEDs & Extended Battery
ELFBAR's newly launched BC30000 features a 30,000-puff capacity powered by a 1100mAh battery. Its interactive LED screen displays animated emoticons with each puff while providing real-time e-liquid and battery status indicators.
Jun.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nepal High Court Rules to Lift Ban on E-cigarette Import and Sales
Nepal High Court Rules to Lift Ban on E-cigarette Import and Sales
Nepal’s Patan High Court ruled to lift the ban on e-cigarette imports and sales, stating the Health Ministry’s directive lacked legal basis. In 2023–2024, e-cigarette imports generated over NPR 230 million (about $1.73 million) in customs revenue.
Jul.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Juul Labs Files Lawsuit Against NJOY and Altria Over Patent Infringement
Juul Labs Files Lawsuit Against NJOY and Altria Over Patent Infringement
Juul Labs sues NJOY and Altria for patent infringement, escalating legal battle over e-cigarette technology.
Aug.11 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Legal Analysis: Why SKE Lost the “CRYSTAL BAR” Trademark Case and Key Takeaways
Attorney Liu Peiling analyzed SKE’s loss in the “CRYSTAL BAR” trademark case, highlighting the UK’s “first-to-file” principle and common pitfalls in Chinese firms’ overseas IP strategies, such as delayed registration and weak evidence. She urged Chinese brands to plan trademark filings early and improve evidence retention to avoid disputes and protect their rights.
Jul.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai