Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes

Sep.09.2022
Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes
CAPHRA Coordinator Nancy Loucas criticizes Australian government's anti-vaping campaign as a misuse of public funds.

Nancy Loucas, the executive coordinator of the Asia Pacific Advocates for Tobacco Harm Reduction (CAPHRA), has expressed that the crackdown on e-cigarette retailers in Australia constitutes a serious misuse of public funds, which should be directed towards improving the country's healthcare system.


Before she issued her statement, the government of New South Wales in Australia intensified its warnings to compliant retailers about the risks associated with e-cigarette products. They also continue to back a controversial joint "education campaign" with the Department of Education on the issue of e-cigarettes.


The centerpiece of the event is the "Get the Facts" - Vaping Toolkit aimed at teachers, parents, and adolescent students. CAPHRA stated that despite Deputy Chief Health Officer Dr. Marianne Gale's assurance that the website does not contain "evidence-based resources and educational materials," it should be taken down while its many statements are independently verified.


These claims about electronic cigarettes are either completely exaggerated or, in the worst case scenario, have no scientific basis. The Australian public, regardless of age, needs to have complete confidence in any health statements on government websites. Unfortunately, this campaign is far from factual. Instead, it is filled with blatant lies," said Ms. Lucas.


In a statement that has angered advocates for tobacco harm reduction (THR) throughout the entire Asia-Pacific region, Dr. Gale claimed, "Many people believe that e-cigarettes are either completely harmless or less harmful than traditional cigarettes.


In a recent situation, an Australian chief health officer has been actively informing the public that the harm of vaping is not less than smoking. However, international research strongly refutes this claim. Despite providing no evidence to support her statement, the Australian public continues to receive such costly yet worthless advice. This is a complete embarrassment," she said.


According to CAPHRA, Australians who want to know the truth about vaping should look to New Zealand. Adults can legally use nicotine e-cigarettes there under regulations targeting retailers and manufacturers in 2020. Smokers looking to quit do not need to obtain a prescription from a doctor, unlike in Australia.


Asking doctors to prescribe cigarettes has left 2.3 million smokers in Australia disappointed, not to mention the approximately 20,000 Australians who die each year from smoking-related illnesses. While Australia's overall smoking rate has remained stagnant over the past decade, New Zealand has seen a 50% decrease in its smoking rate, largely due to the availability of legally sanctioned, less harmful alternatives for smokers, according to Ms. Lucas.


CAPHRA has pointed out that the headline of the New Zealand Ministry of Health's "Vaping facts" website states that "vaping is less harmful than smoking".


New Zealand is engaging in a positive dialogue with the public with the goal of achieving a smoke-free nation by 2025, with a smoking rate of 5% or less. In contrast, health leaders in Australia are continuing to ban adults from entering retail stores while using significant public resources to deter the use of e-cigarettes.


Australia's healthcare system is failing miserably. The persistent threats and lies surrounding e-cigarettes will make it almost impossible to achieve the country's goal of reducing smoking rates by 10% in the short term. They need a new strategy to eradicate tobacco, as the current one clearly isn't working," said Nancy Lucas.


CAPHRA, an advocacy group, has amassed almost 15,000 endorsement letters and is urging those who have quit smoking through the use of nicotine-free alternatives to share their stories on www.righttovape.org.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the opinion of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article’s content. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the translation process, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has begun selling four flavored Vuse Pro pods — Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint — in Ohio and selected other U.S. markets. According to the Vuse U.S. FAQ, Vuse Pro contains approximately 5.0% nicotine by weight, and Vuse Pro pre-filled pods are intended for use with Vuse Alto devices. Reynolds told 2Firsts that product labeling lists an e-liquid capacity of 2.0 mL per pod. The Vuse Alto Power Unit received FDA marketing authorization in 2024, while the new Vuse Pro pods themselves have not received marketing granted orders. The rollout follows the FDA’s May 2026 revision of enforcement priorities for certain unauthorized vaping products with qualifying pending applications.
BAT
Sep.10
Florida Governor DeSantis Expands TANF Restrictions, Blocking Welfare Benefits From Buying Tobacco and Vapes
Florida Governor DeSantis Expands TANF Restrictions, Blocking Welfare Benefits From Buying Tobacco and Vapes
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced an expansion of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) restrictions that would prohibit Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) funds from being used to purchase tobacco and vaping products. The state will amend its TANF State Plan and submit the changes for federal approval. Florida officials said the restrictions would not affect eligibility for temporary cash assistance or the amount of benefits received, but would change how funds can be spent.
Aug.25
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
UK HMRC Unveils Red and Yellow Transitional Vape Duty Stamps Ahead of October Tax Launch
UK HMRC Unveils Red and Yellow Transitional Vape Duty Stamps Ahead of October Tax Launch
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has released sample images of the UK’s transitional vaping duty stamps, showing red and yellow versions ahead of the new Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme starting on October 1, 2026. Transitional stamps contain physical security features but no digital scanning function. Approved businesses may purchase them through November 30 and affix them through December 31. HMRC has not stated that the red and yellow samples represent different product categories or tax statuses.
Regulations
Sep.02
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04