Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes

Sep.09.2022
Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes
CAPHRA Coordinator Nancy Loucas criticizes Australian government's anti-vaping campaign as a misuse of public funds.

Nancy Loucas, the executive coordinator of the Asia Pacific Advocates for Tobacco Harm Reduction (CAPHRA), has expressed that the crackdown on e-cigarette retailers in Australia constitutes a serious misuse of public funds, which should be directed towards improving the country's healthcare system.


Before she issued her statement, the government of New South Wales in Australia intensified its warnings to compliant retailers about the risks associated with e-cigarette products. They also continue to back a controversial joint "education campaign" with the Department of Education on the issue of e-cigarettes.


The centerpiece of the event is the "Get the Facts" - Vaping Toolkit aimed at teachers, parents, and adolescent students. CAPHRA stated that despite Deputy Chief Health Officer Dr. Marianne Gale's assurance that the website does not contain "evidence-based resources and educational materials," it should be taken down while its many statements are independently verified.


These claims about electronic cigarettes are either completely exaggerated or, in the worst case scenario, have no scientific basis. The Australian public, regardless of age, needs to have complete confidence in any health statements on government websites. Unfortunately, this campaign is far from factual. Instead, it is filled with blatant lies," said Ms. Lucas.


In a statement that has angered advocates for tobacco harm reduction (THR) throughout the entire Asia-Pacific region, Dr. Gale claimed, "Many people believe that e-cigarettes are either completely harmless or less harmful than traditional cigarettes.


In a recent situation, an Australian chief health officer has been actively informing the public that the harm of vaping is not less than smoking. However, international research strongly refutes this claim. Despite providing no evidence to support her statement, the Australian public continues to receive such costly yet worthless advice. This is a complete embarrassment," she said.


According to CAPHRA, Australians who want to know the truth about vaping should look to New Zealand. Adults can legally use nicotine e-cigarettes there under regulations targeting retailers and manufacturers in 2020. Smokers looking to quit do not need to obtain a prescription from a doctor, unlike in Australia.


Asking doctors to prescribe cigarettes has left 2.3 million smokers in Australia disappointed, not to mention the approximately 20,000 Australians who die each year from smoking-related illnesses. While Australia's overall smoking rate has remained stagnant over the past decade, New Zealand has seen a 50% decrease in its smoking rate, largely due to the availability of legally sanctioned, less harmful alternatives for smokers, according to Ms. Lucas.


CAPHRA has pointed out that the headline of the New Zealand Ministry of Health's "Vaping facts" website states that "vaping is less harmful than smoking".


New Zealand is engaging in a positive dialogue with the public with the goal of achieving a smoke-free nation by 2025, with a smoking rate of 5% or less. In contrast, health leaders in Australia are continuing to ban adults from entering retail stores while using significant public resources to deter the use of e-cigarettes.


Australia's healthcare system is failing miserably. The persistent threats and lies surrounding e-cigarettes will make it almost impossible to achieve the country's goal of reducing smoking rates by 10% in the short term. They need a new strategy to eradicate tobacco, as the current one clearly isn't working," said Nancy Lucas.


CAPHRA, an advocacy group, has amassed almost 15,000 endorsement letters and is urging those who have quit smoking through the use of nicotine-free alternatives to share their stories on www.righttovape.org.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the opinion of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article’s content. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the translation process, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
A U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an initial determination on October 20, 2026, finding that certain Glas vaping devices, cartridges and components infringed 12 claims across two patents asserted by JUUL, constituting a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against the Glas respondents. Five months earlier, the FDA authorized four Glas e-cigarette pods, including mango, blueberry and two menthol variants. The patent investigation concerns device and cartridge structures and is separate from FDA premarket review. The proposed import restrictions have not become final, and their product-level scope remains unresolved.
company
Nov.05
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania begins enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. The October 18 directory contained 163 product records from seven manufacturers, including Vuse, JUUL, NJOY, Logic and Naked 100. Geek Bar, RAZ and Lost Mary were absent. BAT, Altria, Japan Tobacco and JUUL collectively accounted for 112 records, or 68.7%, while Imperial Brands' blu had no listings. The directory included 15 disposable vape records, 40 bottled e-liquids and 10 products labeled 0mg, but no open-system refillable devices. Twenty-two manufacturer certifications remained under review. Four Logic models corresponding to Smoore's pending records were listed under the brand owner, while LYCO, OXBAR and Boulder/Rock had no approved directory entries.
Regulations
Oct.19
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea Constitutional Court Upholds Volume-Based E-Liquid Tax, With Challenged Rates at KRW 370 and KRW 628 per Milliliter
South Korea's Constitutional Court has upheld fixed taxes on nicotine-containing e-cigarette liquids based on solution volume, ruling that challenged provisions imposing KRW 370 per milliliter in individual consumption tax and KRW 628 per milliliter in tobacco consumption tax do not violate the Constitution. The cases stemmed from historical disputes involving importers that reported nicotine as being extracted from tobacco stems rather than leaves. South Korea has since broadened its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine, while current tax laws provide reduced rates for certain products not derived from tobacco.
Sep.18
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products detailed new PMTA review data and process changes at the 2026 FDLI conference. Pending PMTAs fell from about 450,000 at the start of 2025 to 135,000 by September 2026. CTP also discussed its 180-day review goal, current sPMTA pilot, alternate-supplier planning, more than 50,300 pending SE reports, and lessons from the nicotine pouch pilot already being applied to ENDS review.
Regulations
Oct.07
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18