Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes

Sep.09.2022
Australian Government Accused of Misusing Funds to Combat E-Cigarettes
CAPHRA Coordinator Nancy Loucas criticizes Australian government's anti-vaping campaign as a misuse of public funds.

Nancy Loucas, the executive coordinator of the Asia Pacific Advocates for Tobacco Harm Reduction (CAPHRA), has expressed that the crackdown on e-cigarette retailers in Australia constitutes a serious misuse of public funds, which should be directed towards improving the country's healthcare system.


Before she issued her statement, the government of New South Wales in Australia intensified its warnings to compliant retailers about the risks associated with e-cigarette products. They also continue to back a controversial joint "education campaign" with the Department of Education on the issue of e-cigarettes.


The centerpiece of the event is the "Get the Facts" - Vaping Toolkit aimed at teachers, parents, and adolescent students. CAPHRA stated that despite Deputy Chief Health Officer Dr. Marianne Gale's assurance that the website does not contain "evidence-based resources and educational materials," it should be taken down while its many statements are independently verified.


These claims about electronic cigarettes are either completely exaggerated or, in the worst case scenario, have no scientific basis. The Australian public, regardless of age, needs to have complete confidence in any health statements on government websites. Unfortunately, this campaign is far from factual. Instead, it is filled with blatant lies," said Ms. Lucas.


In a statement that has angered advocates for tobacco harm reduction (THR) throughout the entire Asia-Pacific region, Dr. Gale claimed, "Many people believe that e-cigarettes are either completely harmless or less harmful than traditional cigarettes.


In a recent situation, an Australian chief health officer has been actively informing the public that the harm of vaping is not less than smoking. However, international research strongly refutes this claim. Despite providing no evidence to support her statement, the Australian public continues to receive such costly yet worthless advice. This is a complete embarrassment," she said.


According to CAPHRA, Australians who want to know the truth about vaping should look to New Zealand. Adults can legally use nicotine e-cigarettes there under regulations targeting retailers and manufacturers in 2020. Smokers looking to quit do not need to obtain a prescription from a doctor, unlike in Australia.


Asking doctors to prescribe cigarettes has left 2.3 million smokers in Australia disappointed, not to mention the approximately 20,000 Australians who die each year from smoking-related illnesses. While Australia's overall smoking rate has remained stagnant over the past decade, New Zealand has seen a 50% decrease in its smoking rate, largely due to the availability of legally sanctioned, less harmful alternatives for smokers, according to Ms. Lucas.


CAPHRA has pointed out that the headline of the New Zealand Ministry of Health's "Vaping facts" website states that "vaping is less harmful than smoking".


New Zealand is engaging in a positive dialogue with the public with the goal of achieving a smoke-free nation by 2025, with a smoking rate of 5% or less. In contrast, health leaders in Australia are continuing to ban adults from entering retail stores while using significant public resources to deter the use of e-cigarettes.


Australia's healthcare system is failing miserably. The persistent threats and lies surrounding e-cigarettes will make it almost impossible to achieve the country's goal of reducing smoking rates by 10% in the short term. They need a new strategy to eradicate tobacco, as the current one clearly isn't working," said Nancy Lucas.


CAPHRA, an advocacy group, has amassed almost 15,000 endorsement letters and is urging those who have quit smoking through the use of nicotine-free alternatives to share their stories on www.righttovape.org.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the opinion of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article’s content. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the translation process, the translated article may not fully reflect the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
JTI Proposes 25-Cent Irish Cigarette Tax Increase, Says It Could Raise €45 Million
Japan Tobacco International's Irish business has proposed a €0.25 tax increase on a pack of 20 cigarettes in its pre-Budget 2027 submission, below the €0.50-or-more increases typically imposed in recent Irish budgets. JTI says the proposal could generate around €45 million in additional Exchequer revenue while limiting further movement toward illicit and non-Irish-tax-paid tobacco. Revenue's existing estimate for a comparable €0.25 increase, including pro-rata rises on other tobacco products, is about €18 million for a full year.
JTI
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28
PMI Pushes Smoke-Free Business in Latin America as Argentina Lifts Heated Tobacco Ban, Mexico City Share Tops 7%
PMI Pushes Smoke-Free Business in Latin America as Argentina Lifts Heated Tobacco Ban, Mexico City Share Tops 7%
Philip Morris International (PMI) showcased IQOS heated tobacco systems and nicotine pouch products at Technovation 2026 in Buenos Aires on October 7–8, presenting research on consumer attitudes, regulatory developments and illicit cigarette trade across Latin America. PMI Chief Global Growth Officer Stefano Volpetti said smoke-free products accounted for more than 7% of the Mexico City market. Argentina repealed its heated tobacco ban in May 2026 and introduced registration requirements for tobacco and nicotine products, while local media reported nicotine pouch sales in Mendoza. A PMI-commissioned survey found that only 8% of respondents across four Latin American countries were familiar with nicotine pouches. A separate KPMG study estimated illicit cigarette consumption at 77 billion sticks across 11 markets in Latin America and Canada in 2025.
PMI
Oct.13
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21