Australia's Anti-Vaping Policy is a "Policy Failure" - Expert

Sep.30.2022
Australia's Anti-Vaping Policy is a "Policy Failure" - Expert
An expert in tobacco harm reduction (THR) has criticized Australia's anti-vaping policies, calling for urgent review and sensible recommendations.

When one of the most respected experts on Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR) in the world concludes that Australia's anti-vaping regulations are a 'policy failure,' it is urgent that the country's tobacco control methods are reviewed," said coordinator Nancy Loucas.


Nancy Loucas, the Executive Coordinator of the Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA), has said that the comprehensive review provides much-needed information for Australia's anti-vaping system, and offers some reasonable and sensible suggestions.


Before her comments, Dr. Colin Mendelsohn, an expert and physician in Australia, released a comprehensive 29-page report on Australia's prescription regulations solely for nicotine e-cigarettes. The report examined the progress made in the 12 months since the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) introduced new regulations for nicotine e-liquid on October 1, 2021.


CAPHRA has stated that Australian leaders should rely less on the World Health Organization for advice and listen more to Dr. Mendelson, the scientific community, and the international community.


The Australian government has expanded their restricted prescription drug model and now customs officials are cracking down on individuals attempting to import nicotine e-cigarette liquid at the border. This regulation aims to prevent minors from being exposed to nicotine e-cigarettes while allowing adult smokers to use them as a tool to quit smoking.


Australia is the only Western democracy that requires a prescription for nicotine e-cigarettes, a policy that is not only outrageous but also a complete failure in terms of public health. This comprehensive review provides much-needed information on Australia's anti-vaping regime, and offers some sensible and reasonable suggestions, according to Ms. Loucas.


Dr. Mendelsohn's conclusion is that the regulations in Australia have failed to achieve their intended goals. In fact, they have had the opposite effect. The thriving black market has grown, there has been a sharp increase in teenage use of electronic cigarettes, enforcement against illegal sales and imports is ineffective, very few doctors prescribe nicotine, and very few pharmacies distribute nicotine e-liquids.


Obtaining electronic cigarette products has become increasingly difficult and expensive for adult smokers. As a result, most Australian electronic cigarette users purchase unregulated supplies on the black market and illegally import them without a prescription. Currently, it is easier to purchase deadly cigarettes from over 20,000 retail stores than to access safer alternatives.


CAPHRA states that in terms of effectively controlling tobacco, Australia continues to lag behind in the Asia-Pacific region, and is falling further behind.


According to the statement, approximately 70 countries worldwide have regulated safer nicotine products, however, Australia continues to prohibit adult retail. The medicalization will only make it harder for Australian smokers to switch to e-cigarettes and make it nearly impossible for Australia to achieve its goal of reducing smoking rates by 10%, the spokesperson stated.


The report's main recommendation is to allow sales in licensed retail stores, with strict enforcement of age verification and penalties, including license revocation, for selling to minors. Nicotine liquids with concentrations below 6% should be exempt from federal or state-level poison standards for harm reduction. Furthermore, the system should be overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.


The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) has stated that politicians and health officials in Australia should take heed of the opinions of Dr. Mendelsohn, the scientific community and the international society, instead of solely relying on the World Health Organization's (WHO) viewpoint.


The overall smoking rates in Australia have remained relatively stable in recent years, whereas New Zealand has seen a 50% reduction in smoking rates over the past decade. New Zealand is promoting the use of e-cigarettes as an effective tool for quitting smoking, while Australia's "quit smoking or die" tobacco control approach has failed its 2.3 million smokers, according to Ms. Loucas.


Despite 20,000 Australian smokers dying prematurely due to smoking-related illnesses, Australia's anti-e-cigarette policy has failed and needs to double down on efforts.


CAPHRA has expressed outrage at the active discouragement of Australian adult smokers to switch to less harmful nicotine alternatives. Queensland, New South Wales, and Western Australia continue to invest significant amounts of public funds into a misleading anti-vaping campaign.


Statement:


This article was compiled from third-party information and is only for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government when it comes to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related expressions and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.