Ban on Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Withdrawn in Guam

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.09.2024
Ban on Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Withdrawn in Guam
Guam bill to ban flavored tobacco sales withdrawn after public hearing delay, but will be reintroduced for further modification.

According to a report from American media outlet Postguam, a bill aimed at banning the sale of flavored tobacco products in Guam has been withdrawn after the public hearing was not held as scheduled.

 

Bill 50-37 attempted to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products in Guam, but was later withdrawn by its sponsor, Senator Thomas Fisher, in the next scheduled public hearing.

 

Fisher explained that he withdrew Bill 50 after receiving information from the American Cancer Society in order to make revisions. Fisher further plans to resubmit the bill on Friday morning and hopes to hold a public hearing on the bill on January 11th.

 

However, the lawmaker responsible for this hearing, Sabina Perez, explained that there are certain procedures that need to be followed before organizing a public hearing.

 

After explaining the possibility of a public hearing on January 11th, but without guaranteeing the date of such a hearing, Beres subsequently suspended the hearing.

 

Several hours later, a press release issued from Fisher's office stated that the lack of a public hearing was the result of "irresponsible arrangements.

 

Public hearings are sacred and should never occur, regardless of whether double bookings are due to irresponsible arrangements, misjudgments, or incompetence. The suppression of public opinion should be absolutely avoided," Fisher stated in a press release.

 

The shop owners closed their doors to ensure that their voices are heard today. Even if they oppose my bill, they should still be listened to, along with the opinions of the wider public," Fisher added in the statement.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Can hookah go institutional? A hookah company seeking to go public makes its case with capital, technology and regulation
Can hookah go institutional? A hookah company seeking to go public makes its case with capital, technology and regulation
2Firsts explored whether hookah can evolve into a more mature and governable category by interviewing Dubai-based hookah company AIR. AIR argues that strong margins, OOKA’s closed-system model and the prospect of differentiated regulation could support that shift. The larger question is whether this is simply AIR’s capital-markets narrative, or an early sign that competition, regulation and category boundaries in hookah are beginning to change.
Apr.02
Exclusive|Logistics Operators Warn of Possible New U.S. Border Crackdown on Illicit Vapes
Exclusive|Logistics Operators Warn of Possible New U.S. Border Crackdown on Illicit Vapes
Recent inspections and cargo disruption have led some logistics operators in the China-U.S. vape trade to see early signs of another U.S. border crackdown on illicit e-cigarettes. With late April to early May viewed as a key risk window, the market is watching closely. The bigger question is not only whether enforcement will tighten, but whether it can be sustained.
Special Report
Apr.09
Tasmanian Lower House Passes Tougher Tobacco Bill With Higher Penalties for Sales to Minors
Tasmanian Lower House Passes Tougher Tobacco Bill With Higher Penalties for Sales to Minors
The Tasmanian House of Assembly has passed a new bill aimed at cracking down on the sale of smoking products to children and curbing the illicit tobacco trade. Under the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026, businesses caught selling tobacco products to minors would face steeper, tiered fines.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Wins Default Entry in Case Against E-Cigarette Distributor, to Seek Permanent Injunction
FDA Wins Default Entry in Case Against E-Cigarette Distributor, to Seek Permanent Injunction
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made procedural progress in its lawsuit against North Carolina-based e-cigarette distributor Dream Distro LLC and its owner. A federal district judge granted the government’s request for entry of default after the defendants failed to respond to the complaint within 21 days of service. The government will next seek a default judgment, including a permanent injunction.
Apr.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Netherlands Plans Law to Ban Possession of Large Quantities of Vapes Intended for Trade
Dutch Health Minister Hermans is drafting legislation that would also ban possession of larger quantities of vapes, allowing the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority to intervene earlier and seize stock before proving that trade has taken place.
Apr.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
ITC Keeps Exclusion and Cease-and-Desist Orders in Place Against Stiiizy
ITC Keeps Exclusion and Cease-and-Desist Orders in Place Against Stiiizy
U.S. International Trade Commission has refused to pause the import and sales bans imposed on cannabis vape company Stiiizy while it appeals the agency’s patent infringement ruling in its dispute with Pax Labs.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai