Banning flavored tobacco sales to protect youth health

Aug.08.2022
Banning flavored tobacco sales to protect youth health
Bangor City Council reinstates ban on flavored tobacco sales to prevent youth vaping and smoking.

In October of last year, the council of the city of Bangor voted to ban the sale of flavored tobacco in order to prevent young people from vaping and smoking.


The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health's poster emphasizes the dangers of flavored tobacco. Source: Damian Dovarganes/AP.


After a vote of 7 to 1, a city lawyer has notified city council members that an ordinance set to take effect on June 1 must be repealed because the city failed to adequately notify tobacco retailers that it was considering the ban. Bangor City attorney David Szewczyk told council members in April that the city was required to directly notify local tobacco retailers at least 30 days before considering the ordinance because it was more restrictive than state law. Due to the lack of notification, the ban has been repealed before taking effect.


Now, almost 10 months later, the ban on the sale of flavored tobacco is once again being presented to the city council.


Unless there have been some changes since October - which we do not believe have taken place - the council should reissue the ban.


The rate of tobacco use among teenagers is on the rise, especially with regards to e-cigarettes. Based on a statewide health survey, in 2019 over a quarter of high school students in Maine reported using e-cigarettes, nearly double the rate from two years prior. Additionally, 16% of middle school students reported trying e-cigarettes in 2019, which is a rise from the 10% reported in 2017.


Across the country, 85% of young people who use e-cigarettes opt for flavored varieties. These products come in hundreds of different flavors, with many sounding like candy or soda, making them particularly appealing to young people.


According to data from the US Food and Drug Administration, three-quarters of current tobacco users report that their first tobacco product was flavored. The agency also reports that almost all smoking starts at the age of 18.


The FDA has proposed a rule to ban additional flavored tobacco products nationwide.


It is essential to keep tobacco products away from young people. Currently, it is illegal to sell tobacco products to anyone under 21 in Maine. However, the results of a youth health survey and state compliance report show that there are still many gaps in this law.


Banning the sale of flavored tobacco in one of the largest cities in the state will help fill these gaps and save lives and taxpayer money.


Bangor became the first community in Maine to vote last fall to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products. Portland passed its own anti-flavored tobacco sales ordinance in February, and Brunswick passed one in April. Both became effective on June 1st. Other communities are considering their own bans.


A statewide bill (LD 1550) that would ban flavored tobacco products in Maine has been put on hold as the legislative body has not taken final action.


Tobacco retailers and store owners are correct in stating that a statewide ban would make more sense than a community-by-community approach. However, in the absence of legislative action, bans in cities such as Bangor, Portland, and Brunswick may spur statewide action.


After presenting the evidence last year, the Bangor city council member strongly supported the ban. The evidence remains unchanged and their vote should not be altered.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information for the purpose of industry communication and learning.


The article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the accuracy or truthfulness of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely for use in industry exchange and research.


Due to limited translation abilities, the translated article may not fully express the same message as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and the author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Exclusive Analysis | Smoore H1 Revenue Rises 19.9% Amid Growth Concentration, Profit Pressure and Slowing Momentum
Smoore’s first-half 2026 revenue rose 19.9%, but the results revealed growing structural risks beneath the headline growth. Heat-not-burn contributed about 61% of incremental revenue and remains driven largely by one core customer, while traditional vaping markets diverged, own-brand growth slowed and China enterprise revenue declined further. Gross profit and adjusted profit lagged revenue growth, while second-quarter revenue growth slowed to about 1.9%, putting greater focus on the quality, concentration and sustainability of Smoore’s expansion.
Capital Markets
Aug.20
Product | OXVA Launches ONEO Pro in France, Upgrading Its Open-Pod Platform
Product | OXVA Launches ONEO Pro in France, Upgrading Its Open-Pod Platform
Vape brand OXVA has introduced the ONEO Pro, a refillable open-pod system that entered the French market in July 2026. The device features a 2,100mAh battery, up to 40W output, a 4ml refillable cartridge, multiple coil options and a 0.96-inch color TFT display. The launch reflects continued performance upgrades within the refillable open-pod segment, with brands adding higher capacity, adjustable output and smarter device interaction.
Aug.03
Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania has opened IQOS Boutique Victoriei in Bucharest, expanding the country’s IQOS retail network to 120 points of sale and advancing a Retail 2.0 concept that combines design, technology, interactive art and urban culture.
PMI
Jul.13
Smoore Wins Three Heated Device Supply Lots in China Tobacco Jiangsu’s Overseas Market Project Covering Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia
Smoore Wins Three Heated Device Supply Lots in China Tobacco Jiangsu’s Overseas Market Project Covering Japan, South Korea and Southeast Asia
China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co., Ltd. (JSIC) has completed its 2026-2028 heated device procurement project, with Shenzhen Smoore Technology Limited securing final supply contracts for three lots: U1, C1 and C2. The project was launched through a public tender in June 2026 to support overseas markets and involved heated tobacco devices carrying JSIC’s “iRod” trademark. Candidate supplier results published on July 13 showed Smoore ranked first for the three awarded lots, while Shenzhen Yunxi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Bodi Technology Development Co., Ltd. participated in the bidding process.
Aug.03
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06