BAT Sells 3.5% Stake in ITC for $2.1 Billion

BAT by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mar.14.2024
BAT Sells 3.5% Stake in ITC for $2.1 Billion
British American Tobacco (BAT) sells 3.5% stake in India's ITC Ltd for $2.1 billion, retaining 25.5% ownership.

According to a report from the Indian media outlet Theweek, British American Tobacco (BAT) sold a 3.5% stake in Indian Tobacco Company (ITC Ltd) through a public market transaction on March 13, with the total transaction amount reaching 174.85 billion rupees ($2.1 billion USD).

 

Despite completing this major transaction, BAT remains an important shareholder of ITC, holding a 25.5% stake in the company. Other shareholders of ITC include the Singapore government, Singapore Monetary Authority, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Goldman Sachs (Singapore), Copthall Mauritius Investments, BofA Securities Europe SA, Societe Generale, Morgan Stanley Asia Singapore Limited, and Ghisallo Master Fund LP.

 

BAT has sold over 436.8 million equity shares through its subsidiary India Tobacco Manufacturers (India) Ltd, in 48 transactions, equivalent to a 3.5% stake in ITC. The average selling price for these shares was 400.25 Indian rupees per share, with a total transaction value of 174.85 billion Indian rupees.

 

Over 30 institutions purchased shares in this sale, including ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund, Motilal Oswal MF, Nippon India MF, SBI MF, Max Life Insurance Company, IMF, Capital Group, Kuwait Investment Authority, The People's Bank of China, and International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

 

It is reported that BAT plans to use the net proceeds from this bulk transaction to buy back its own shares by December 2025, starting as early as 2024, with a total amount of up to 700 million pounds. In addition, BAT will continue to use operating cash flow to fund its transformation and further reduce debt.

 

The initial investment by BAT in ITC can be traced back to the early 20th century, with both companies maintaining a mutually beneficial relationship for an extended period of time.

 

Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.

South Korea's Low Solid Nicotine Tax Draws Criticized for "Ultra-Low Tax Rate" Advantage
South Korea's Low Solid Nicotine Tax Draws Criticized for "Ultra-Low Tax Rate" Advantage
In South Korea, solid nicotine vapes are taxed based solely on nicotine weight, resulting in significantly lower tax burdens compared to liquid-based products. This has sparked debate over tax fairness, with experts calling for swift regulatory revisions to prevent market distortions and weakened policy effectiveness.
May.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Cambodia’s E-Cigarette Ban Extends to Foreign Investment—Is China or Vietnam Involved?
Cambodia’s E-Cigarette Ban Extends to Foreign Investment—Is China or Vietnam Involved?
In April 2025, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet publicly rejected an investment application for an e-cigarette factory from an unnamed country, which has drawn widespread international attention. Has China, Vietnam, or some other third country already begun industrial layout in Cambodia?
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New Product Gallery | SMOREL FEELM Exhibits 7 Products, Including Magnetic Flavor-Adjustable, Clear Oil Products, and Push-Screen Flavor Switching
New Product Gallery | SMOREL FEELM Exhibits 7 Products, Including Magnetic Flavor-Adjustable, Clear Oil Products, and Push-Screen Flavor Switching
According to the booth staff, FEELM has showcased 7 new products and four partner brands (VAPO, SNS, MEVOL, and RAMA) at the exhibition.
Jun.18
Tax Measures Proposed in Tennessee to Regulate E-Cigarette Market
Tax Measures Proposed in Tennessee to Regulate E-Cigarette Market
Tennessee proposes taxes on e-cigarette products, creates FDA-approved product registry to prevent unauthorized sales, concerns over market monopoly.
Apr.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Panic Buying Sweeps UK Market Ahead of Disposable Vape Ban, Popular Flavour Sales Surge 50%–100%
Panic Buying Sweeps UK Market Ahead of Disposable Vape Ban, Popular Flavour Sales Surge 50%–100%
Ahead of the UK's disposable vape ban, consumer stockpiling has emerged, with multiple online platforms reporting a 50% to 100% surge in sales of disposable devices—particularly in popular flavours. However, research shows that users aged 16 to 24 are increasingly shifting toward reusable devices, suggesting the ban may have limited impact on overall usage rates.
May.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
German Court: ELFPRO Infringed ELFBAR Trademark; Offender to Cease Operations
German Court: ELFPRO Infringed ELFBAR Trademark; Offender to Cease Operations
The Düsseldorf Regional Court ruled that the use of "ELFPRO" infringed on ELFBAR's trademark. The court supported iMiracle’s claims during the interim injunction phase. The infringing party plans to cease operations under legal pressure.
Apr.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai