California Bans Flavored Tobacco Products, Including E-Cigarettes

Dec.22.2022
California Bans Flavored Tobacco Products, Including E-Cigarettes
California has banned flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and pods, due to concerns about nicotine addiction among young people.

If you are unable to purchase your favorite flavored e-cigarette at a local California smoke shop today, do not be surprised.


In the previous election, California voters approved Proposition 31, which reiterates the ban on flavored tobacco. Two years ago, lawmakers passed the ban, claiming that fruit and candy-flavored e-cigarettes, vaping pods, and chewing tobacco encourage youth nicotine addiction. According to the official voting argument, supporters claim that 80% of children who smoke start with flavored tobacco products.


The law was reaffirmed when the U.S. Supreme Court denied the tobacco company's request to lift the ban.


The ban, which came into effect on December 21st, requires retailers to cease the sale, offer for sale, and possession with intent to sell, of flavored cigarettes and tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes and tobacco product additives.


In addition, California has banned the following products, regardless of whether or not they contain nicotine:


This refers to electronic cigarettes or devices that contain or are sold with flavored liquids or elements, such as "eliquids", "ejuices", or pods. It also includes tobacco products, ingredients, parts, or accessories that are sold with flavoring components, as well as flavored mini-cigars or cigars, smokeless tobacco, loose leaf tobacco, blunt wraps, or rolling papers.


The new ban does not affect high-quality flavored cigars and flavored loose-leaf tobacco for pipes that are sold at wholesale prices of $12 or more.


Furthermore, this law does not apply to shisha lounges in stores that sell flavored tobacco, which can only be open to individuals aged 21 or older.


Retailers and wholesalers who possess prohibited flavored tobacco products can contact their suppliers and request a refund. Conversely, distributors can seek a return of the consumer tax paid to the government.


Retailers who violate the ban will be fined $250 (approximately 1745 Chinese yuan) for each offense.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Cambodian's Phnom Penh Military Police continue crackdown after 300,000-device raid
Cambodian's Phnom Penh Military Police continue crackdown after 300,000-device raid
Phnom Penh Military Police said they have continued cracking down on locations selling electronic devices used for smoking chemicals, following a major raid last week that confiscated 300,000 electronic smoking devices.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea to regulate synthetic-nicotine e-liquids as tobacco from April 24
South Korea to regulate synthetic-nicotine e-liquids as tobacco from April 24
South Korea’s Health Ministry says amendments to the Tobacco Business Act will take effect on April 24, bringing synthetic-nicotine e-liquid vapes under the legal definition of tobacco. The shift extends cigarette-style rules to these products, including mandatory graphic warnings, sharply limited advertising channels, stricter vending-machine placement requirements, and a ban on use in smoke-free areas, with enforcement checks slated from late April.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
A committee substitute for House Bill 5437, the Vape Safety Act sponsored by Del. David McCormick (David McCormick), was recommended Monday afternoon by the House Health and Human Resources Committee to the full House, with the bill next heading to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 5437 would require specialty shops selling tobacco, tobacco-derived products, alternative nicotine, or vapor products and accessories to obtain a state license from the Alcohol Beverage Control Administration (ABCA)
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ispire Q2 FY2026 revenue falls to $20.3M as it trims lower-quality customers; A/R down nearly 20%
Ispire Q2 FY2026 revenue falls to $20.3M as it trims lower-quality customers; A/R down nearly 20%
Ispire reported a sharp year-on-year revenue decline in Q2 FY2026 as it shifted away from lower-quality customers, while cutting operating expenses and narrowing its net loss. The company also highlighted improved collections, with net accounts receivable down nearly one-fifth since June 30, 2025, alongside ongoing manufacturing and technology initiatives.
Feb.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
Ireland’s 2026 amendment bill to regulate nicotine pouches and tighten rules on vaping products
The Irish government has approved the publication of the Public Health (Tobacco Products and Nicotine Inhaling Products) (Amendment) Bill 2026. The bill would ban the sale of nicotine consumption products such as nicotine pouches to those under 18 and further regulate nicotine vaping products.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Breeze Smoke and Glas, Inc. have separately requested White House review under Executive Order 12866 as the FDA advances draft guidance on flavored ENDS (RIN 0910-ZC78). The guidance aims to clarify evidentiary standards under the statutory “appropriate for the protection of public health” (APPH) framework. The parallel filings highlight industry concern over regulatory predictability, particularly as Glas’s PMTA review status has recently drawn market attention.
Special Report
Mar.03