California Bans Flavored Tobacco Products, Including E-Cigarettes

Dec.22.2022
California Bans Flavored Tobacco Products, Including E-Cigarettes
California has banned flavored tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and pods, due to concerns about nicotine addiction among young people.

If you are unable to purchase your favorite flavored e-cigarette at a local California smoke shop today, do not be surprised.


In the previous election, California voters approved Proposition 31, which reiterates the ban on flavored tobacco. Two years ago, lawmakers passed the ban, claiming that fruit and candy-flavored e-cigarettes, vaping pods, and chewing tobacco encourage youth nicotine addiction. According to the official voting argument, supporters claim that 80% of children who smoke start with flavored tobacco products.


The law was reaffirmed when the U.S. Supreme Court denied the tobacco company's request to lift the ban.


The ban, which came into effect on December 21st, requires retailers to cease the sale, offer for sale, and possession with intent to sell, of flavored cigarettes and tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes and tobacco product additives.


In addition, California has banned the following products, regardless of whether or not they contain nicotine:


This refers to electronic cigarettes or devices that contain or are sold with flavored liquids or elements, such as "eliquids", "ejuices", or pods. It also includes tobacco products, ingredients, parts, or accessories that are sold with flavoring components, as well as flavored mini-cigars or cigars, smokeless tobacco, loose leaf tobacco, blunt wraps, or rolling papers.


The new ban does not affect high-quality flavored cigars and flavored loose-leaf tobacco for pipes that are sold at wholesale prices of $12 or more.


Furthermore, this law does not apply to shisha lounges in stores that sell flavored tobacco, which can only be open to individuals aged 21 or older.


Retailers and wholesalers who possess prohibited flavored tobacco products can contact their suppliers and request a refund. Conversely, distributors can seek a return of the consumer tax paid to the government.


Retailers who violate the ban will be fined $250 (approximately 1745 Chinese yuan) for each offense.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Dutch Data Show 244 Companies Continued Illegal Vape Sales After Two Fines
Dutch Data Show 244 Companies Continued Illegal Vape Sales After Two Fines
According to RTL Nieuws, citing figures from the Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA), hundreds of Dutch shops continue to sell illegal vapes, often even after repeated fines.
Apr.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
BAT New Zealand Says Illicit Tobacco Trade Drove Nearly 29% Revenue Decline in 2025
BAT New Zealand Says Illicit Tobacco Trade Drove Nearly 29% Revenue Decline in 2025
British American Tobacco New Zealand said the illicit tobacco trade is responsible for its profit halving and revenue falling between the 2024 and 2025 financial years. Financial results filed with the Companies Office show that BAT Holdings (New Zealand) recorded 2025 revenue of NZ$180.7 million, or about US$106.95 million based on the European Central Bank’s April 27, 2026 reference rates, down from NZ$254 million, or about US$150.33 million, in 2024.
Apr.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Tobacco Farming in the New Nicotine Era: Why Indian Farmers Struggle to Transition — Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Tobacco Farming in the New Nicotine Era: Why Indian Farmers Struggle to Transition — Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
In this contributed article to 2Firsts, Mumbai-based journalist and harm reduction advocate Samrat Chowdhery examines India’s tobacco transition from the perspective of agriculture, supply chains and regulation. As noted by 2Firsts, India offers a relevant case for understanding how new nicotine technologies may affect not only consumption, trade and policy, but also tobacco farming.
Special Report
May.29
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
Carlos Cabrera, founder of CabLab Law & Advocacy, contributes this article to 2Firsts, arguing that the EU’s evolving approach to novel tobacco regulation may unintentionally reinforce cigarette use by narrowing alternatives. He warns companies to watch signals on flavours, labelling, traceability, nicotine pouch rules and digital marketing, while grounding business decisions in realistic timelines, compliance planning and continuous monitoring.
Apr.22
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case brought by seven small vape-liquid companies challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s denial of marketing authorization for their flavored electronic nicotine products.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai