California Tobacco Sales Ban Bill Put on Hold

Apr.17.2023
California Tobacco Sales Ban Bill Put on Hold
California tobacco bill to gradually eliminate sales put on hold, now focuses on enforcing flavor ban.

On April 15th, a California bill that aimed to gradually eliminate tobacco sales was put on hold, and anti-tobacco organizations have not disclosed why they did not provide support. The bill has since been modified to focus on enforcing the existing ban on flavored tobacco.


Three years ago, advocates successfully convinced California's legislative body to prohibit the sale of flavored tobacco products in an effort to reduce the number of smokers and e-cigarette users in the state, following a fierce lobbying campaign by industry proponents.


In recent months, a newly-elected member of California's legislature proposed a gradual elimination of tobacco sales, yet anti-tobacco organizations mostly remained silent. The proposal was postponed this week and did not even receive a hearing. The legislator will introduce a bill in this session to strengthen the enforcement of the ban on flavored tobacco.


In February of this year, Democratic legislator Damon Connolly introduced Assembly Bill 935, which proposes a bold move to prohibit the sale of tobacco products, including cigarettes, cigars, and e-cigarettes, to individuals born on or after January 1, 2007. Connolly hails from San Rafael.


This concept remains at the forefront globally. In December of last year, New Zealand became the first country to adopt such an approach, prohibiting the sale of tobacco products, including cigarettes, to individuals born after 2008. The town of Brookline in Massachusetts passed a broader tobacco product ban in 2020, including electronic cigarettes. The ban faced legal challenges from retailers and was upheld in court last year.


Lawmakers in Hawaii and Nevada have also proposed gradual elimination of sales this year, but neither of these measures have held a hearing yet.


Further reading:


California lawmakers propose bill to end tobacco use.


References:


California lawmakers have decided to postpone the proposed 'Endgame' bill aimed at eliminating the tobacco industry. The legislation has been put on hold for now.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan Investigates Social-Media Vape Sales Linked to a Banking “Drop” Arrangement
Kazakhstan Investigates Social-Media Vape Sales Linked to a Banking “Drop” Arrangement
Kazakhstan’s Financial Monitoring Agency (AFM) in Ulytau Region is conducting a pre-trial investigation into alleged illegal vape sales and the unlawful acquisition of access to a bank account. Authorities say a Satpayev resident has sold banned devices via social media since 2024 and used a “dropper” arrangement to disguise proceeds.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland to ban “characterising flavours” in heated tobacco sticks from Jan. 18, 2026
Poland will implement an amended health protection law on January 18, 2026, restricting the availability of tobacco inserts used in heated tobacco devices. The new rules prohibit products with a “characterising flavour,” meaning a clearly noticeable taste or smell other than tobacco, derived from additives and detectable before or during use.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York directs Tax and Finance to build “Vapor Products” registry; products not listed deemed illegal
New York directs Tax and Finance to build “Vapor Products” registry; products not listed deemed illegal
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul says the state will crack down on illegal flavored vapes by creating a registry identifying which vapor products may be legally sold. The governor directed the state Department of Taxation and Finance to establish a “Vapor Products” registry, with products not on the list treated as illegal.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
Element Vape, a U.S. online vaping retailer, uses origin labels such as “Made in USA” and “Assembled in USA” across disposable vape product pages and a dedicated collection page, grouping items under “Made in USA Disposable Vapes,” but the platform does not disclose on its public pages the applicable standards or evidentiary basis for these different claims.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
Vape sellers sue to block Texas law banning e-liquids from China and other “foreign adversaries”
A group of vape distributors and retailers has sued to block enforcement of a Texas law that criminalizes selling or marketing vape products containing e-liquids made wholly or partly in China or in countries designated as “foreign adversaries” by the U.S. Commerce Secretary. The plaintiffs argue the law violates the U.S. Constitution because only Congress may regulate foreign commerce.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai