CAPHRA Launches New E-cigarette Series Exposing Anti-vaping Campaign in Australia

Aug.16.2022
CAPHRA Launches New E-cigarette Series Exposing Anti-vaping Campaign in Australia
CAPHRA launched a new e-cigarette series to counter anti-vaping propaganda in Australia, citing evidence-based videos by Dr. Colin Mendelsohn.

The Asia Pacific Advocates for Tobacco Harm Reduction Alliance (CAPHRA) has launched a new series of e-cigarettes that expose the anti-vaping campaign in Australia. According to Nancy Loucas, CAPHRA Executive Coordinator, "fortunately, the unpleasant truth about e-cigarettes is now available on laptops of Australians, debunking all the scaremongering propaganda being sold by health agencies and officials against vaping.


Prior to Ms. Loucas' commentary, Dr. Colin Mendelsohn, an Australian tobacco harm reduction expert, released a series of eight evidence-based, short videos about e-cigarettes to debunk misinformation provided by Dr. Karl Kruszelnicki to the Queensland Health Department.


Queensland, New South Wales, and Western Australia are investing a significant amount of public funds into an inaccurate anti-vaping campaign. As a result, adult smokers in Australia are being actively discouraged from switching to less harmful nicotine alternatives. Dr. Col's "Vape Truths" thoroughly exposes Australia's unfounded anti-vaping stance and is well worth a read, according to her.


Dr. Mendelsohn's eight-part video series reveals that the toxicity of vapor is significantly lower than that of cigarette smoke. Compared to smoking, e-cigarettes significantly reduce the risk of cancer and have never been linked to deaths caused by nicotine ingestion. When smokers switch to e-cigarettes, their breathing greatly improves. The doses of most chemicals in vapor are very low, and many are harmless or carry minimal risks.


The overall smoking rate in Australia has remained almost unchanged in recent years, while in New Zealand it has decreased by half over the past decade. New Zealand is promoting e-cigarettes as an effective smoking cessation tool, while Australia's "quit or die" tobacco control approach has failed its 2.3 million smokers severely, according to Ms. Loucas.


The Coalition of Asia Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (CAPHRA) has stated that Australia is falling behind the Asia Pacific region when it comes to regulating electronic cigarettes. They mentioned that the Philippines is the latest country to regulate the import, manufacture, sale, packaging, distribution, and use of e-cigarettes.


The "Vaporized Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Products Regulation Act" became a law on July 25 in the Philippines, and local health experts believe it will help reduce the incidence of serious illnesses and deaths caused by smoking.


CAPHRA has stated that Australia is the only Western democratic country where a nicotine prescription is required to consume electronic cigarettes, which is absurd.


Approximately 70 countries worldwide regulate safer nicotine products, but health leaders in Australia continue to prohibit adult retail. Medicalization makes it more difficult for smokers to switch to e-cigarettes and makes Australia's goal of reducing smoking rates by 10% nearly impossible. In contrast, New Zealand aims for smoke-free with only 5% or fewer New Zealanders smoking,” she said.


CAPHRA believes that Dr. Mendelsohn's latest counterattack movement confirms that the ongoing panic and hysteria surrounding e-cigarettes in Australia is completely unfounded.


These inconvenient facts also expose the World Health Organization's (WHO) continued refusal to acknowledge that an increasing amount of international scientific evidence confirms that the harm from e-cigarettes is far less than from smoking," she said.


Approximately 20,000 Australian smokers die prematurely each year due to smoking-related illnesses. CAPHRA believes that if Australia is serious about reducing this alarming annual death toll, politicians and health officials should rely less on the World Health Organization and instead listen more to Dr. Mendelsohn, the scientific community, and the international society.


The inevitable failure of the e-cigarette ban has been seen as the Philippines recently lifted its ban, with Malaysia and Thailand set to follow suit. Dr. Col's Vape Truths video series has timely exposed Australia's increasingly isolated and untenable position on e-cigarettes. "This is a must-watch for any skeptics," says Nancy Loucas.


This article is compiled from third-party information sources and is intended for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of its content. The compilation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research.


Due to the limitations in the level of translation, the compiled article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the original article for accuracy.


In all domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs, 2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government's positions and statements.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
Kuwait Tightens Tobacco and Nicotine Rules, Bans Under-21 Sales and Extends Public Smoking Restrictions to Vapes and Heated Tobacco
Kuwait Tightens Tobacco and Nicotine Rules, Bans Under-21 Sales and Extends Public Smoking Restrictions to Vapes and Heated Tobacco
Kuwait has issued a comprehensive new regulatory framework covering tobacco, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and other nicotine products. Ministerial Decision No. 237 of 2026, signed by Health Minister Ahmad Al-Awadhi, will take effect on January 1, 2027. The rules prohibit sales to people under 21 and ban sales through websites, apps, social media and delivery services. E-cigarettes and heated tobacco products will also be treated as smoking in public and enclosed places where smoking is prohibited. Nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products not registered as medicines are banned.
Regulations
Aug.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23