Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia

Mar.03.2022
Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia
Russia is China's third-largest e-cigarette export market, facing challenges due to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

Russia is currently China’s third largest export market for electronic cigarettes, according to the “2021 Electronic Cigarette Industry Blue Book” published by the Electronic Cigarette Industry Committee of the China Electronic Commerce Association and Juul Labs. The report reveals that in 2021, China’s electronic cigarette industry is projected to export about 138.3 billion yuan, up 180% from the previous year. The top four countries and regions for electronic cigarette exports are the United States, the European Union, Russia, and the United Kingdom, accounting for 53%, 15%, 9%, and 7% respectively.

 

With the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, China's export of electronic cigarettes to Russia is facing multiple challenges.

 

The impact of SWIFT sanctions on settlements is limited.

 

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Russia's relationship with Western powers, is increasingly tense. On February 27th, the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom announced sanctions against the 10 largest financial institutions in Russia through the SWIFT system. The crisis has resulted in an atmosphere of great international tension.

 

Although some Russian banks may be excluded from SWIFT, the impact on the industry is not significant. Several e-cigarette foreign trade practitioners have stated that their company's export settlement has not been affected by SWIFT sanctions. They said that their company's clients usually open accounts in foreign banks in Russia, exchange rubles for dollars within Russia, and use dollars to complete payments. Currently, this business is continuing.

 

Ruble depreciation leads to order cancellations.

 

However, the devaluation of the ruble has had a more serious impact on the trade of electronic cigarettes between China and Russia. According to information obtained by "2FIRSTS", a vast majority of Chinese e-cigarette exporters have reported significant effects. Recently, there has been a great deal of volatility in Russia's financial markets. On February 24th, the Russian RTS index plummeted by over 50%, dropping to 611.95 points, while the MOEX index fell by more than 45%.

 

The Russian ruble experienced a significant depreciation, causing a surge in key energy commodities including oil and natural gas on February 28th. The off-shore exchange rate for the ruble against the US dollar also plummeted nearly 30%.

 

According to 2FIRSTS, Chinese exporters have stated that the devaluation of the ruble has caused immense pressure on Russian e-cigarette importers, with costs skyrocketing overnight. Faced with these huge cost pressures, a large proportion of importers have been forced to cancel their foreign trade orders for Chinese e-cigarettes. Importers are unlikely to engage in bulk order transactions until the ruble exchange rate improves.

 

This change has caught the market off guard. Prior to the recent conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the Chinese e-cigarette industry expected exports to Russia to increase by 50-100% this year. However, the unexpected event has had a significant impact. If the conflict persists, it is estimated that the Russian market will perform worse than last year, and the entire market will stagnate.

 

There could be ongoing disruptions to Grey's logistics.

 

Chinese e-cigarette exporters are facing significant difficulties in exporting to Russia due to challenging customs clearance procedures. Prior to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, e-cigarettes from China would typically be cleared through a grey customs clearance process, meaning they would first arrive in Russian-speaking countries surrounding Russia, go through customs there, and then be transported into Russia. However, in the current geopolitical climate, logistics and border controls are much stricter, making grey customs channels between China and Russia less accessible.

 

Currently, the electronic cigarette market in Russia is not experiencing any shortage pressures, as distributors typically hold a three-month inventory. The impact of logistics disruptions has not yet been felt by consumers, and there have been no reports of significant price increases.

 

The dispute between Russia and Ukraine is unlikely to be resolved to everyone's satisfaction in the short term, and western sanctions against Russia will continue. This will present various inconveniences for the export of Chinese e-cigarettes to the Russian market. While the battlefield may be constantly changing, the fundamentals of supply and demand have not shifted. In the long term, the Chinese e-cigarette industry can still keep an eye on the Russian market and wait for trade to return to normal.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products is reshaping how it approaches tobacco product review. Based on 2Firsts’ on-site reporting in New York and Washington, this report traces CTP’s emerging direction: stronger links between PMTA and tobacco harm reduction, more category-specific review, greater emphasis on decision-relevant science, more predictable timelines and expanded use of sPMTA for product modifications. CTP also acknowledged major constraints, including just nine PMTA review teams, persistent backlogs and limits on hiring capacity.
Regulations
Oct.08
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia’s tobacco excise debate is increasingly exposing differences within the governing Labor Party. New South Wales Labor Premier Chris Minns reaffirmed on September 8 that he supports reducing tobacco excise, arguing that current tax settings are pushing consumers toward cheaper black-market cigarettes. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler continues to oppose an excise cut, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino have recently stopped short of ruling out future changes. The divergence follows the opposition Coalition’s proposal to cut tobacco excise by 80%.
Sep.08
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Ahead of implementation, DOJO, PIXL and Hayati have introduced or been reported to be adding lower-capacity tiers alongside larger products. DOJO has added a 6ml BLAST7K Fresh below its 10ml BLAST10K Fresh, PIXL offers both a 12ml 8000 and a 6ml 5K, while retailer Ninja Vapes says Hayati is preparing a 7ml 4K alongside its existing 12ml 6K. The pattern points to a growing lower-capacity tier in the UK market, although the brands have not all explicitly linked the changes to the new duty.
Sep.23
Los Angeles Cracks Down on Illicit Flavored Vapes and Counterfeit Goods: 12 Businesses Searched, 24 Arrested, Eight Truckloads Seized
Los Angeles Cracks Down on Illicit Flavored Vapes and Counterfeit Goods: 12 Businesses Searched, 24 Arrested, Eight Truckloads Seized
Los Angeles authorities searched 12 businesses and arrested 24 people during a multi-agency operation targeting illicit flavored vaping products, flavored cigarettes and counterfeit merchandise on October 22, 2026. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department said approximately eight tractor-trailer loads of merchandise were seized. Alleged violations involved flavored tobacco sales restrictions, tobacco licensing requirements and counterfeit trademark laws. Local, state and federal agencies participated. Authorities have not disclosed the number, brands or value of vaping products seized. Investigations remain ongoing.
Enforcement
Oct.28