Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia

Mar.03.2022
Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia
Russia is China's third-largest e-cigarette export market, facing challenges due to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

Russia is currently China’s third largest export market for electronic cigarettes, according to the “2021 Electronic Cigarette Industry Blue Book” published by the Electronic Cigarette Industry Committee of the China Electronic Commerce Association and Juul Labs. The report reveals that in 2021, China’s electronic cigarette industry is projected to export about 138.3 billion yuan, up 180% from the previous year. The top four countries and regions for electronic cigarette exports are the United States, the European Union, Russia, and the United Kingdom, accounting for 53%, 15%, 9%, and 7% respectively.

 

With the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, China's export of electronic cigarettes to Russia is facing multiple challenges.

 

The impact of SWIFT sanctions on settlements is limited.

 

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Russia's relationship with Western powers, is increasingly tense. On February 27th, the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom announced sanctions against the 10 largest financial institutions in Russia through the SWIFT system. The crisis has resulted in an atmosphere of great international tension.

 

Although some Russian banks may be excluded from SWIFT, the impact on the industry is not significant. Several e-cigarette foreign trade practitioners have stated that their company's export settlement has not been affected by SWIFT sanctions. They said that their company's clients usually open accounts in foreign banks in Russia, exchange rubles for dollars within Russia, and use dollars to complete payments. Currently, this business is continuing.

 

Ruble depreciation leads to order cancellations.

 

However, the devaluation of the ruble has had a more serious impact on the trade of electronic cigarettes between China and Russia. According to information obtained by "2FIRSTS", a vast majority of Chinese e-cigarette exporters have reported significant effects. Recently, there has been a great deal of volatility in Russia's financial markets. On February 24th, the Russian RTS index plummeted by over 50%, dropping to 611.95 points, while the MOEX index fell by more than 45%.

 

The Russian ruble experienced a significant depreciation, causing a surge in key energy commodities including oil and natural gas on February 28th. The off-shore exchange rate for the ruble against the US dollar also plummeted nearly 30%.

 

According to 2FIRSTS, Chinese exporters have stated that the devaluation of the ruble has caused immense pressure on Russian e-cigarette importers, with costs skyrocketing overnight. Faced with these huge cost pressures, a large proportion of importers have been forced to cancel their foreign trade orders for Chinese e-cigarettes. Importers are unlikely to engage in bulk order transactions until the ruble exchange rate improves.

 

This change has caught the market off guard. Prior to the recent conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the Chinese e-cigarette industry expected exports to Russia to increase by 50-100% this year. However, the unexpected event has had a significant impact. If the conflict persists, it is estimated that the Russian market will perform worse than last year, and the entire market will stagnate.

 

There could be ongoing disruptions to Grey's logistics.

 

Chinese e-cigarette exporters are facing significant difficulties in exporting to Russia due to challenging customs clearance procedures. Prior to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, e-cigarettes from China would typically be cleared through a grey customs clearance process, meaning they would first arrive in Russian-speaking countries surrounding Russia, go through customs there, and then be transported into Russia. However, in the current geopolitical climate, logistics and border controls are much stricter, making grey customs channels between China and Russia less accessible.

 

Currently, the electronic cigarette market in Russia is not experiencing any shortage pressures, as distributors typically hold a three-month inventory. The impact of logistics disruptions has not yet been felt by consumers, and there have been no reports of significant price increases.

 

The dispute between Russia and Ukraine is unlikely to be resolved to everyone's satisfaction in the short term, and western sanctions against Russia will continue. This will present various inconveniences for the export of Chinese e-cigarettes to the Russian market. While the battlefield may be constantly changing, the fundamentals of supply and demand have not shifted. In the long term, the Chinese e-cigarette industry can still keep an eye on the Russian market and wait for trade to return to normal.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
FDA Authorizes Four More Nicotine Pouches as Review Pilot Expands Beyond Initial Decisions
The FDA has authorized four additional on! nicotine pouches, bringing the U.S. total to 30. The decision marks another outcome of the agency’s nicotine pouch review pilot, whose communication and review practices are now being applied more broadly across the category. It also extends Helix’s authorized portfolio from on! PLUS to the earlier on! line. Yet all FDA-authorized nicotine pouches still come from subsidiaries of PMI or Altria, underscoring how concentrated U.S. regulatory access remains.
Aug.05
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company Launches Flavored Vuse Pro Pods in U.S. Without FDA Marketing Authorization
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has begun selling four flavored Vuse Pro pods — Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint — in Ohio and selected other U.S. markets. According to the Vuse U.S. FAQ, Vuse Pro contains approximately 5.0% nicotine by weight, and Vuse Pro pre-filled pods are intended for use with Vuse Alto devices. Reynolds told 2Firsts that product labeling lists an e-liquid capacity of 2.0 mL per pod. The Vuse Alto Power Unit received FDA marketing authorization in 2024, while the new Vuse Pro pods themselves have not received marketing granted orders. The rollout follows the FDA’s May 2026 revision of enforcement priorities for certain unauthorized vaping products with qualifying pending applications.
BAT
Sep.10
JTI Makes Third Bet on South Korea as Ploom AURA Enters a Market Dominated by lil and IQOS
JTI Makes Third Bet on South Korea as Ploom AURA Enters a Market Dominated by lil and IQOS
Japan Tobacco International is stepping up its heated tobacco push in South Korea with Ploom AURA. Since its official launch in April 2026, the device's limited First Edition and Glacier White version have sold out, while distribution has expanded across Seoul, Incheon, Gyeonggi Province and airport duty-free channels. The rollout marks JTI's third major attempt to build a stronger heated tobacco position in South Korea, following Ploom TECH in 2019 and Ploom X Advanced in 2024. At the group level, JT plans to invest about ¥800 billion, approximately $5 billion, in reduced-risk products from 2026 through 2028, with heated products and Ploom identified as its primary investment priority.
Aug.14
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28
Indonesia’s BNN Pushes Total Vape Ban as Health Ministry Tightens Tobacco Packaging Rules, Putting $40 Billion Industry at Risk
Indonesia’s BNN Pushes Total Vape Ban as Health Ministry Tightens Tobacco Packaging Rules, Putting $40 Billion Industry at Risk
Indonesia is entering a new phase of debate over vape and tobacco regulation. The National Narcotics Agency (BNN) has proposed a total vape ban, with some lawmakers supporting stronger restrictions. At the same time, the Health Ministry is advancing tobacco and nicotine regulations under Government Regulation No. 28/2024, including measures such as plain packaging and product controls. Tobacco and vape industries have warned that tighter rules could affect a sector worth around $40 billion, supporting about 6 million jobs and contributing significant tax revenue.
Jul.27
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21