Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia

Mar.03.2022
Challenges for China's E-Cigarette Export to Russia
Russia is China's third-largest e-cigarette export market, facing challenges due to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine.

Russia is currently China’s third largest export market for electronic cigarettes, according to the “2021 Electronic Cigarette Industry Blue Book” published by the Electronic Cigarette Industry Committee of the China Electronic Commerce Association and Juul Labs. The report reveals that in 2021, China’s electronic cigarette industry is projected to export about 138.3 billion yuan, up 180% from the previous year. The top four countries and regions for electronic cigarette exports are the United States, the European Union, Russia, and the United Kingdom, accounting for 53%, 15%, 9%, and 7% respectively.

 

With the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, China's export of electronic cigarettes to Russia is facing multiple challenges.

 

The impact of SWIFT sanctions on settlements is limited.

 

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Russia's relationship with Western powers, is increasingly tense. On February 27th, the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom announced sanctions against the 10 largest financial institutions in Russia through the SWIFT system. The crisis has resulted in an atmosphere of great international tension.

 

Although some Russian banks may be excluded from SWIFT, the impact on the industry is not significant. Several e-cigarette foreign trade practitioners have stated that their company's export settlement has not been affected by SWIFT sanctions. They said that their company's clients usually open accounts in foreign banks in Russia, exchange rubles for dollars within Russia, and use dollars to complete payments. Currently, this business is continuing.

 

Ruble depreciation leads to order cancellations.

 

However, the devaluation of the ruble has had a more serious impact on the trade of electronic cigarettes between China and Russia. According to information obtained by "2FIRSTS", a vast majority of Chinese e-cigarette exporters have reported significant effects. Recently, there has been a great deal of volatility in Russia's financial markets. On February 24th, the Russian RTS index plummeted by over 50%, dropping to 611.95 points, while the MOEX index fell by more than 45%.

 

The Russian ruble experienced a significant depreciation, causing a surge in key energy commodities including oil and natural gas on February 28th. The off-shore exchange rate for the ruble against the US dollar also plummeted nearly 30%.

 

According to 2FIRSTS, Chinese exporters have stated that the devaluation of the ruble has caused immense pressure on Russian e-cigarette importers, with costs skyrocketing overnight. Faced with these huge cost pressures, a large proportion of importers have been forced to cancel their foreign trade orders for Chinese e-cigarettes. Importers are unlikely to engage in bulk order transactions until the ruble exchange rate improves.

 

This change has caught the market off guard. Prior to the recent conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the Chinese e-cigarette industry expected exports to Russia to increase by 50-100% this year. However, the unexpected event has had a significant impact. If the conflict persists, it is estimated that the Russian market will perform worse than last year, and the entire market will stagnate.

 

There could be ongoing disruptions to Grey's logistics.

 

Chinese e-cigarette exporters are facing significant difficulties in exporting to Russia due to challenging customs clearance procedures. Prior to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, e-cigarettes from China would typically be cleared through a grey customs clearance process, meaning they would first arrive in Russian-speaking countries surrounding Russia, go through customs there, and then be transported into Russia. However, in the current geopolitical climate, logistics and border controls are much stricter, making grey customs channels between China and Russia less accessible.

 

Currently, the electronic cigarette market in Russia is not experiencing any shortage pressures, as distributors typically hold a three-month inventory. The impact of logistics disruptions has not yet been felt by consumers, and there have been no reports of significant price increases.

 

The dispute between Russia and Ukraine is unlikely to be resolved to everyone's satisfaction in the short term, and western sanctions against Russia will continue. This will present various inconveniences for the export of Chinese e-cigarettes to the Russian market. While the battlefield may be constantly changing, the fundamentals of supply and demand have not shifted. In the long term, the Chinese e-cigarette industry can still keep an eye on the Russian market and wait for trade to return to normal.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
EU ‘TPD3’ Enters Next Phase on Aug. 14 as Fragmented Vape and Nicotine Pouch Rules Push the Single Market Toward Regulatory Overhaul
A 12-week European Commission consultation on revising the Tobacco Products Directive and Tobacco Advertising Directive is due to close on Aug. 14, 2026. The Commission has identified e-cigarette flavours, disposable vapes, tobacco heating devices, nicotine pouches, nicotine-free e-cigarettes, packaging and digital marketing among areas for possible new EU rules. National regulations already vary significantly across the bloc, a fragmentation the Commission says creates internal-market barriers and distorts competition. No formal revised TPD/TAD legislative text has yet been published, with the Commission currently indicating December 2026 for the legislative initiative.
Aug.14
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
AIRSCREAM’s production hub in the Czech Republic brings nicotine pouch manufacturing, e-liquid bottling, product documentation, warehousing and international logistics into one operation, giving brands and commercial partners a practical platform from which to launch, expand and enter new markets.
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canada Health Minister Says She Is Not Considering Looser Nicotine Pouch Retail Rules as PMI-Linked Group Pushes for Wider Access
Canadian Health Minister Marjorie Michel says she is not considering loosening retail restrictions on nicotine pouches. Canada regulates pouches containing 4 mg or less of nicotine per unit as non-prescription nicotine replacement therapy and requires newer NRT formats such as pouches to be sold from behind pharmacy counters. Meanwhile, Unsmoke Canada, linked to Philip Morris International's Canadian business, is pushing to allow pouches in convenience stores and other general retail outlets. Health Canada also acknowledges continued unauthorized sales, while recent research shows rising pouch use among Canadian youth aged 16 to 19.
Sep.24
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
EU Tobacco Tax Reform Targets November Push as Sweden Holds Nicotine-Pouch Minimum at €20 per Kilogram
EU Tobacco Tax Reform Targets November Push as Sweden Holds Nicotine-Pouch Minimum at €20 per Kilogram
The Irish presidency of the Council of the European Union is using bilateral talks to push the bloc’s Tobacco Taxation Directive toward a political agreement in November. According to Law360, citing an EU official, Sweden is unwilling to accept a minimum excise threshold above €20 per kilogram for nicotine pouches. Council negotiations have already lowered the European Commission’s original proposal, but a May 2026 presidency compromise still set the minimum at 10% of the tax-inclusive retail price or €30 per kilogram in 2028-29, with higher levels later.
Market
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14