China's E-Cigarette Tax Policy: Status and Prospects.

Aug.04.2022
China's E-Cigarette Tax Policy: Status and Prospects.
China's e-cigarette regulation is forming, with tax policies currently being developed. Future tax rates are expected to be high.

As of the end of July, China's regulatory system for electronic cigarettes has largely taken shape. One of the central components of this system is the development of a taxation policy for electronic cigarettes, which is currently still under progress. The Tobacco Bureau has suggested that it will collaborate with relevant departments to develop this policy, and is currently studying and working through the necessary procedures.


Industry experts widely believe that the implementation of taxes on e-cigarettes is only a matter of time. Ma Weimin, founder and CEO of GeWuXiaoFei, stated in an interview with the China Times that based on global trends in regulation, the e-cigarette industry will undoubtedly be subject to strong regulation and high taxes in the future.


Li Min, a tobacco engineering intermediate professional title and compliance expert, analyzed to a reporter from Hua Xia Times that the diversification and modernization of nicotine intake methods is a global trend. Countries such as Russia, Japan, the United States, and the United Kingdom that have imposed taxes on electronic cigarettes impose composite taxes on various tobacco products based on quantity and price, and the main regulatory measure is to gradually increase the quantity tax. From the taxation and market situations of tobacco products in overseas countries, the methods and rates of taxation have varying impacts.


Should cigarettes be included in the scope of consumption tax collection?


Under the new regulations, electronic cigarettes will be subject to the same regulations as traditional cigarettes and be sold through a specialized distribution system. However, there is currently debate within the industry as to whether electronic cigarettes will also be subject to consumer taxes, similar to traditional cigarettes.


According to a report by the Tobacco Economics Research Institute of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, titled "2018 China Tobacco Control Performance Report," China's comprehensive cigarette tax rate is 66.6%. Currently, the consumption tax on tobacco is classified into three categories: in the industrial production stage, Category A cigarettes are taxed at a rate of 56% plus 0.003 yuan per cigarette, while Category B cigarettes are taxed at a rate of 36% plus 0.003 yuan per cigarette. In the commercial wholesale stage, the tax rate is 11% plus 0.005 yuan per cigarette.


According to calculations by the fourth generation of wireless pods from Yuike, the current retail price per pod is 33 yuan. If taxed at the rate of a category B cigarette, which is 11% at the wholesale level and 36% at the production level, the incremental tax burden would be approximately 8.2 to 14.2 yuan, accounting for 25% to 43% of the original retail price.


In response to this, a reporter from China Times contacted the official of Yooz, and Yooz replied that they have not yet obtained any new information on the e-cigarette taxation policy. Currently, they are steadily advancing the work in accordance with the policy requirements.


Minsheng Securities has released a report stating that levying a consumption tax on new tobacco products is an inevitable trend. Drawing on Japan and South Korea for reference, China's future tax rate for new tobacco products may begin at a lower rate and gradually increase to approach that of traditional cigarettes. Currently, electronic cigarettes in China are only subject to value-added tax, with significantly lower tax rates than traditional cigarettes.


The electronic cigarette market has cooled down after the imposition of taxes.


According to Li Min, multiple countries have already implemented taxes on electronic cigarettes, although the tax rates may vary among each country.


The United States is the top global seller of electronic cigarettes. The government has yet to impose a uniform tax on e-cigarettes, but it is currently working on a plan to charge $0.0278 per milligram of nicotine content, which equates to about $1 per pod of 36 milligrams. Similar to traditional cigarettes, each state has its own regulations on taxing electronic cigarettes. California, for example, will start imposing a 12.5% ad valorem tax on e-cigarettes in 2021, while Texas currently has a 0% tax rate (though there will be licensing fees starting in 2021). Kentucky will impose a 15% ad valorem tax plus $1.50 per unit starting in 2021, while North Carolina has been charging a tax of $0.05 per milliliter of e-cigarette liquid since 2015. None of these states have established a specialized tax on tobacco products.


According to Li Min, in 2021, the electronic cigarette market in the United States exceeded $10.3 billion, which is about one-tenth of the $968 billion cigarette market. This is due to the fact that the electronic cigarette tax burden in various states is generally lower than that of traditional cigarettes.


Regarding the impact of tax rates on the market, Li Min added, "The China Tobacco Science and Education Network reported in April of last year, in an effort to bring new perspectives. The report suggested that raising tobacco taxes could reduce tobacco consumption, with the World Health Organization recommending a tax rate of 75% of its retail price.


Looking at other countries and regions, the European Union does not have an overall requirement for member states to uniformly impose a consumption tax on electronic cigarettes. However, many member states have included the "e-liquid" for electronic cigarettes in their consumption tax code, and impose a volume-based tax on it. The tax rates vary among countries, with Finland and Portugal having the highest tax rate at 0.3 euros/ml.


South Korea became the first country to impose a consumption tax on electronic cigarettes. In 2011, the country expanded the scope of tobacco consumption tax to include "electronic tobacco" and began with a tax rate of 400 South Korean won per milliliter of e-liquid. The tax has since gradually increased and currently stands at a total of 1,799 South Korean won per milliliter of e-liquid. South Korea also imposes a green fund tax of 24.4 South Korean won per 20 pods, which is equivalent to the tax rate for 20 traditional cigarettes.


The taxation of electronic cigarettes in Indonesia is stricter compared to traditional tobacco products. Electronic cigarettes are subject to a 57% consumption tax based on their retail price, while the average consumption tax rate for Indonesian tobacco products is 23%.


The electronic cigarette markets in these countries have generally experienced a decline in popularity after being subjected to taxation, and may require some time to recover. For example, in Indonesia, sales of electronic cigarette products saw a sharp increase in 2016, but growth slowed down after the implementation of electronic cigarette taxes on July 1, 2017.


The state of the electronic cigarette market in Indonesia.


Source: Euromonitor, Zhongtai Securities Research Institute, ECiglntelligence


Statement


This article contains excerpts or reprints from third-party sources, and the copyright belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion. Any individual or organization that needs to reprint, please contact the author and do not reprint directly.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
U.S. Military Nicotine Policy Sparks Debate as Nicotine Pouches Enter Discussion
An opinion article published by Stars and Stripes argued that the Pentagon’s January nicotine clinical guidelines overemphasize abstinence, fail to reflect the reality that about 30% of active-duty personnel use nicotine, and do not address nicotine pouches as potential harm-reduction products.
Industry Insight
Jun.08
Ireland Vape Bill Passes Dáil, Setting Limits on Flavours, Packaging and Retail Display
Ireland Vape Bill Passes Dáil, Setting Limits on Flavours, Packaging and Retail Display
Ireland’s Public Health (Tobacco Products and Nicotine Inhaling Products) (Amendment) Bill 2026 has passed final stage in the Dáil and will move to the Seanad, with measures to limit vape flavours to tobacco or unflavoured products and tighten rules on packaging colours, retail advertising, in-store displays and sales of nicotine pouches to minors.
News
Jun.26 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Charlie’s Plans Q3 2026 Pilot of America’s First Age-Gated Flavored Disposable Vape
Charlie’s Plans Q3 2026 Pilot of America’s First Age-Gated Flavored Disposable Vape
U.S. vape company Charlie’s Holdings announced plans to pilot its age-gated flavored disposable vape products in hundreds of retail stores during the third quarter of 2026. The company said the products will utilize AI- and blockchain-powered age-verification technology designed to address FDA concerns over youth access and potentially create a new compliance pathway for flavored vape products.
Jun.15
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
Supreme Vape Revenue Rises 15% Despite UK Disposable Vape Ban
UK consumer goods group Supreme said its vaping revenue rose 15% to £148.1 million in the year to March 31, 2026, despite the UK disposable vape ban taking effect during the period, while the company identified the Vaping Products Duty due in October as the next major industry milestone.
Regulations
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Pennsylvania’s June 26 ENDS Pending Certifications list previews the state’s future legal vape market, placing Vuse, JUUL and Logic alongside Chinese-linked disposable brands OXBAR and LYCO. Shaped by PMTA eligibility and state rules, the list shows competition shifting from market share to market access.
Special Report
Jul.06
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
A University of Louisville research team published a study in an American Heart Association journal suggesting that synthetic cooling agents used in e-cigarettes, including WS-3 and WS-23, may disrupt cardiac electrical activity and increase arrhythmia risk. In animal experiments, WS-23 tripled premature heartbeats.
Jun.16