2Firsts Investigation | China–U.S. E-cigarette Shipping Costs Surge: Sea Freight Up Over 200%, Air Cargo Inspection Rate Exceeds 50%

Oct.15.2025
2Firsts Investigation | China–U.S. E-cigarette Shipping Costs Surge: Sea Freight Up Over 200%, Air Cargo Inspection Rate Exceeds 50%
Since late July, China–U.S. e-cigarette shipping costs have surged — sea freight up over 200%, air cargo inspection rates exceeding 50%. 2Firsts investigates the key drivers behind the spike and how the industry is responding.

Key Points

 

● China–U.S. e-cigarette shipping costs have surged since late July 2025, with sea freight rates increasing by over 200% and air freight prices rising three- to five-fold.

 

● The recently introduced “Special Port Service Fee” for U.S. vessels added a new cost factor, but high inspection rates in the U.S. remain the primary driver of logistics price hikes.

 

● Air cargo inspections now reach up to 50%, and sea freight inspections stand at 5–7%, leading logistics companies to shift toward smaller batch shipments to manage risk.

 

● Since mid-2024, the FDA and CBP have intensified joint enforcement, expanding inspections beyond ports to warehouses and distributors, significantly raising compliance risks for exporters.

 


 

By 2Firsts | October 15, 2025 | Shenzhen —Since early 2025, the logistics of exporting e-cigarettes from China to the United States have drawn growing attention across the industry. According to information obtained by 2Firsts from logistics providers, sea freight rates on the China–U.S. route have continued to rise since late July, while air freight costs and inspection risks have surged in parallel.

 

On October 10, China’s Ministry of Transport issued a notice introducing a “Special Port Service Fee” for U.S.-flagged vessels, effective October 14, 2025. The fee will be phased in over several years, adding a new cost factor to transpacific logistics.

 

To understand the latest dynamics in China–U.S. e-cigarette shipping, 2Firsts spoke with several logistics professionals.

 

 

Special Port Fee Adds New Cost Variable—but Not the Main Driver

 

 

The Notice on the Special Port Service Fee for U.S. Ships specifies the following rates based on net tonnage:

 

● From October 14, 2025: RMB 400 per net ton

● From April 17, 2026: RMB 640 per net ton

● From April 17, 2027: RMB 880 per net ton

● From April 17, 2028: RMB 1,120 per net ton

 

2Firsts Investigation | China–U.S. E-cigarette Shipping Costs Surge: Sea Freight Up Over 200%, Air Cargo Inspection Rate Exceeds 50%
Source: China Ministry of Transport

 

A logistics company told 2Firsts that following the announcement, Matson — a key fast-ship operator for e-cigarette cargo — raised its freight rates. A veteran logistics professional, referred to as “A,” said:

 

“Since the port fee was announced, the fast-ship rate for e-cigarettes has gone up by RMB 5 per kilogram — that’s RMB 5,000 per ton.”

 

In contrast, other e-commerce cargo saw more modest increases:

 

“For general goods, a container’s rate rose by about US$1,000, which translates to around RMB 0.6 per kilogram.”

 

This means the e-cigarette rate increase is over eight times higher than that for other types of cargo.

 

Another logistics company confirmed that quotes were broadly adjusted in response to the new port fee, with average sea freight for e-cigarettes rising by around RMB 1 per kilogram — though exact increases vary by route, delivery time, and insurance terms.

 

 

Sea Freight Prices Triple in Three Months, Risk Premiums Drive Surge

 

 

Despite the new port fee, most industry sources agree that the main driver of freight inflation is the elevated inspection rate in the U.S. rather than the new government charge.

 

“The special port fee is just a small part of the increase. What’s really pushing up the cost is the growing inspection risk,” said one logistics operator.

 

Since late July, sea freight rates for e-cigarettes exported to the U.S. have surged and are now at their highest levels this year.

 

“Before June, sea freight was just over RMB 10 per kilogram. Since July, it’s jumped to RMB 45–50. That’s more than a 200% increase — nearly the same as historical air freight levels.”

 

 

Air Freight Prices Spike, Logistics Firms Shift to Smaller Batches

 

 

On the air freight side, A noted that prices have risen to RMB 95–150 per kilogram (insurance included) since May — 3 to 5 times higher than the RMB 30–40 range seen before April ended.

 

“Air freight is under intense scrutiny. We can’t take too many orders. Our clients still want air, but if something goes wrong, the loss is too much.”

 

His company currently compensates clients at RMB 200/kg for goods, and with freight included, the potential loss per kilogram is RMB 300 — three times the shipping price.

 

“Even with insurance included, if a shipment is inspected, we still end up losing money.”

 

As a result, many logistics providers have scaled back their air freight operations, only handling small batches of cargo.

 

At A’s company, air freight now accounts for less than 15% of its e-cigarette business, while sea freight makes up nearly 80%.

 

 

U.S. Crackdown on Illicit E-cigarettes Drives Up Inspection Rate and Freight Costs

 

 

A told 2Firsts that the sustained rise in logistics costs is primarily linked to the persistently high inspection rate at U.S. ports since late April.

 

“Warehousing and port fees abroad are already high. When inspections rise and it’s hard to return seized goods, everyone has no choice but to raise prices.”

 

According to him, sea freight inspections have risen to 5–7%, up from 1–2% before June, while air freight inspections are far more intense, reaching 40–50%.

 

These enforcement efforts reflect broader U.S. regulatory trends. According to previous 2Firsts interviews with the FDA and related international media reports, only 39 e-cigarette products have been granted FDA marketing authorization to date, accounting for less than 20% of the U.S. e-cigarette market. Most of the popular products currently sold in the U.S. have not received full regulatory clearance.

 

Moreover, some tobacco companies have criticized the FDA for its slow pace in product review, which they argue hampers the path to lawful commercialization.

 

Since mid-2024, the FDA has intensified joint enforcement actions in coordination with the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other federal agencies, targeting the sale and import of unauthorized e-cigarettes.

 

“FDA, CDP, and Customs are working together. Inspections have expanded beyond ports to include overseas warehouses and even distributor facilities,” A added.

 

Larger warehouses now face higher inspection risks. Once flagged, goods are often difficult to return and more likely to be confiscated, significantly increasing the overall risk.

 

Under such conditions, many logistics firms have shifted to a “batch-and-clear” model — shipping in smaller volumes and clearing each shipment before moving the next, in order to minimize large-scale losses.

 

However, despite the high shipping costs, demand for e-cigarette exports remains strong. 

 

A stated that the company has not seen any decline in orders; instead, they continue to grow. “Right now, we hesitate to take on many shipments for fear of potential issues and losses. There’s no shortage of orders—what’s lacking are the ones we can accept with peace of mind.”

 

2Firsts will continue to monitor developments in e-cigarette logistics between China and the United States, as well as trends in the U.S. e-cigarette market.

 PMI Opens Generative AI Center in Portugal to Support Global Operations
PMI Opens Generative AI Center in Portugal to Support Global Operations
According to information released by Portugal’s Trade & Investment Agency (AICEP) in July 2026, Philip Morris International (PMI) has established a global Generative Artificial Intelligence Factory (GenAI Factory) at its Portuguese subsidiary Tabaqueira. The center will support PMI’s global operations by developing and deploying AI solutions focused on industrial process optimization, data analytics, operational automation and AI application development. The initiative strengthens Portugal’s role in PMI’s global technology and innovation network.
Aug.27
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
A new Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2026, requires retailers to obtain permits to sell liquid nicotine, vape and tobacco products, while directing Virginia ABC to conduct inspections and verify that stores sell only products listed in the state directory.
Jul.20
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
How Large Is France’s Off-Channel Tobacco Market? Logista Says It Has Become Structural, While the Official Estimate Is 17.7% and Some Industry Studies Put It Above 50%
How Large Is France’s Off-Channel Tobacco Market? Logista Says It Has Become Structural, While the Official Estimate Is 17.7% and Some Industry Studies Put It Above 50%
Logista France says tobacco consumption outside France’s official tobacconist network has become a large and structural market phenomenon, but official and industry estimates differ sharply. France’s TAFE study estimates that 17.7% of tobacco consumption escaped domestic taxation in 2023, with most of that volume attributed to cross-border purchasing rather than street sales. Some industry studies use broader off-channel definitions and put the figure above 50%. Meanwhile, French Customs seized 547.94 tonnes of tobacco in 2025, up 12%, showing continued pressure from illicit trade.
Sep.04
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Couche-Tard Posts Double-Digit U.S. Same-Store Growth in Other Nicotine Products, Led by Pouches
Alimentation Couche-Tard said U.S. same-store sales in its “other nicotine products” category grew at a double-digit rate in the first quarter of fiscal 2027, led by nicotine pouches, while overall U.S. same-store merchandise revenues increased 1.7%. The company also said its Canadian nicotine business continued to face regulatory pressure and illicit-market headwinds. The U.S. performance coincides with Couche-Tard's participation in efforts to reopen Canadian convenience-store access to authorized nicotine pouches, though the company has not established a direct causal link between the two.
Sep.14
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28