Controversy Surrounds Texas Law Punishing Students for Vaping

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.10.2024
Controversy Surrounds Texas Law Punishing Students for Vaping
Houston Chronicle reports that a new Texas law has led to a surge of students being sent to disciplinary centers. Critics argue the punishment is disproportionate.

According to a report by the Houston Chronicle, a significant number of public high school students in the Houston area are being sent to discipline centers due to a new law in the state of Texas aimed at curbing underage smoking. However, this penalty has sparked dissent among critics who argue that it does not align with criminal behavior.

 

According to reports, the SB114 bill took effect on September 1st last year and mandates that public schools send students caught using e-cigarettes to disciplinary centers, which are designated for students with severe issues. The bill places the act of possessing e-cigarettes on campus on the same level of punishment as carrying firearms to school, making terror threats, and committing acts of violence.

 

According to data compiled by the Houston Chronicle, more than 1,300 students from the five largest districts in Houston have faced disciplinary measures this year, with the majority being sent to alternative schools. This law allows for temporary suspensions either off-campus or on-campus when the capacity at Discipline Alternative Education Programs (DAEP) is insufficient.

 

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States, over 2.1 million students reported using e-cigarettes in 2023. These products are known to have addictive properties and pose potential risks.

 

Critics of the new law, including school administrators, parents, and advocates, argue that the punishment is too severe and lacks flexibility, suggesting that students would benefit from higher-quality outcomes through therapy and intervention measures. Ed Thompson, a Texas state representative who proposed the bill, stated that its goal is to rescue children from the criminal justice system and pointed out that there has been a reduction in smoking cases in Brazoria County since the legislation was passed.

 

Furthermore, he stated that he proposed this measure after learning about the inundation of e-cigarette issues in some schools and law enforcement agencies in Bralosoria County. He highlighted that many students in the region have been referred to the criminal justice system for using or selling e-cigarettes containing nicotine or marijuana.

 

He hopes the bill can give schools the opportunity to handle these students internally, with sufficiently strict punishments, "to make these children feel the fear of God," rather than depleting resources at the county level. He also hopes to prevent children from having a criminal record because of "one foolish decision.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s federal prosecutors sue for strict e-cigarette rules, urging regulation over a “paper ban”
Brazil’s Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPF) has filed a public civil action seeking to compel the federal government and Anvisa to establish a strict, enforceable regulatory framework for electronic smoking devices, replacing the current blanket ban. The lawsuit calls for mandatory product registration, nicotine caps, bans on youth-targeted advertising, and clear health warnings on packaging, and demands a national consumption report and an implementation timetable within 90 days.
Jan.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
A Seoul court has annulled South Korea’s health-levy assessments imposed on multiple importers of nicotine liquids used for vaping. While the court agreed the nicotine could be treated as “tobacco” because it was found to be leaf-derived, it ruled the levy—stacked with other taxes and calculated on a blunt, volume-only basis—was so severe it effectively deprived businesses of the ability to operate, breaching constitutional proportionality and equality standards.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK government letter agrees nicotine pouches are lower risk than smoking and a harm reduction tool
UK government letter agrees nicotine pouches are lower risk than smoking and a harm reduction tool
In correspondence with 20isPlenty campaigners, the government agreed nicotine pouches are likely to pose lower health risks than smoking and confirmed they are a harm reduction tool, while warning about their high nicotine content, fast absorption and potential to be flavoured.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK reminds vaping firms to apply for new excise duty registration from April 2026
UK reminds vaping firms to apply for new excise duty registration from April 2026
HMRC has issued a reminder urging vaping manufacturers, importers and warehouse operators to prepare for registration under the UK’s new Vaping Products Duty, with applications opening in April 2026 and the duty taking effect in October.
Feb.10
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul Labs has asked a U.S. federal court to prevent NJOY and Altria from using documents stored in a public UCSF database in an ongoing patent lawsuit, arguing they are protected by attorney–client privilege. The defendants say the files have long been public and may contain evidence relevant to Juul’s patent conduct.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai