Critique of Heavy Metal Toxicity in E-cigarette Vapor.

Jan.16.2023
Critique of Heavy Metal Toxicity in E-cigarette Vapor.
Professors Soulet and Sussman criticize flawed research claiming heavy metal toxicity risks in e-cigarette vapor, call for standardized vaping protocols.

Professors Soulet and Sussman from the United States have published a critical review of a study claiming to have discovered toxic risks of heavy metals in e-cigarette vapor. Both professors are recognized as leading experts in e-cigarette research.


Their research indicates that teams identifying potential toxic risks use poor research methods, leading to inaccuracies resulting in a disconnect between the actual harm of electronic cigarettes in the real world or an overestimation of exposure levels.


Heavy metals can accumulate in soft tissues of the body and cause toxicity. Many of them are essential for proper bodily function in small amounts, but when they build up they can become hazardous.


The primary metals that have garnered attention include aluminum, antimony, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lithium, manganese, mercury, nickel, and zinc.


In 2015, Planet of the Vapes reported on Dr. Farsalinos' first analysis of metal content in e-cigarettes. He emphasized how the negative results were obtained through inferential data, therefore not reflecting the daily use of e-cigarettes.


Two years later, the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University in the United States claimed to have found five heavy metals in vapor, and they repeated this claim the following year. This topic has become a favorite among anti-e-cigarette scholars.


Their discovery led to press releases, media briefings, and ongoing negative media coverage, with many people believing that these reports went against facts and common sense.


In 2019, a news report about a study on heavy metals found in nicotine products failed to mention that the samples were not electronic cigarette oil or electronic cigarette products. The press release and story obscured the fact that the results came from legally prescribed smoking cessation drugs, syrups, suspensions, and gum!


The name of the organization responsible for a majority of the output offers a clue as to why it is so negative: the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University.


Professors Soulet and Sussman focused their research on the 36 studies published in 2018 that assessed the levels of toxic heavy metals in electronic cigarette vapor.


They commented, "We found serious methodological flaws in all studies reporting high metal contents (such as nickel, lead, chromium, and manganese) that exceed toxicological markers.


The researchers identified a significant flaw in the suction protocol utilized, specifically regarding how the machine extracts vapor from e-cigarettes. This includes factors such as frequency, duration, the type of liquid utilized, and the wattage of the device settings.


As Dr. Farsalinos discovered many years ago, these vaping protocols cannot replicate the way in which e-cigarette users inhale vapor, resulting in an extreme and overwhelming experience that can be difficult to handle.


After reviewing these studies, Professors Soulet and Sussman suggest that researchers adopt a standardized vaping protocol, which can replicate the real-world use of electronic cigarettes.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
Acme Vape Ltd, the company behind UK vaping brand IVG, has received HM Revenue & Customs approval to operate an excise warehouse for vaping products and participate in the Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme. The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Acme Vape Ltd says its approved warehouse in Preston will become operational under the new regime on the same date.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea Extends Vape Rules to Unmanned Stores After Bringing Synthetic Nicotine Under Tobacco Law
South Korea's Ministry of Gender Equality and Family said on September 14 that it plans to designate unmanned e-cigarette stores as businesses where minors are prohibited from entering or working. Operators would be required to verify customers' ages and display notices restricting access by minors. The proposal is open for public comment through October 6. The move follows an April expansion of South Korea's statutory tobacco definition that brought products made with natural or synthetic nicotine under the Tobacco Business Act. Nicotine-free liquids and products using nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine, however, remain an emerging regulatory issue.
Sep.21
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
Following recent FDA authorizations for JUUL2 and ZYN ULTRA, 2Firsts Compliance Solutions held an online PMTA briefing on Sept. 4 to examine what the decisions may signal about review efficiency, scientific evidence and U.S. market access. Nearly 30 participants from brands, manufacturers, compliance service providers and investment firms joined the discussion.
2Firsts Events
Sep.06
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
British American Tobacco (BAT) Global Travel Retail has expanded the VELO Travellers’ Collection with three new Summer Editions: Mexico, Spain and Sweden. Inspired by destination themes, the new nicotine pouch variants are designed for global travel-retail channels. The launch further strengthens VELO’s positioning as a travel-retail exclusive product collection.
Aug.27