ELFBAR Resolves Global Dispute Over "ELF" Trademark with VPR Brands LP

Apr.01
ELFBAR Resolves Global Dispute Over "ELF" Trademark with VPR Brands LP
ELFBAR announces global settlement with VPR Brands LP over "ELF" trademark dispute, covering major markets like US, Canada, UK.

Key points

 

  • ELFBAR has announced that a global dispute over the "ELF" trademark with VPR Brands LP has been resolved. 
  • The settlement agreement applies to almost all major global markets including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the European Union. 
  • ELFBAR stated that they have now confirmed ownership of the ELF series trademarks including ELFBAR, ELFX, ELFA, and ELFLIQ. 
  • VPR stated that they signed a litigation settlement agreement on January 30, 2026 for a total consideration of $5.25 million, with VPR receiving $3.2 million after deducting legal fees.

 


 

April 1, 2026,2Firsts

 

According to a press release from PRNewswire and stocktitan, ELFBAR has announced that it has reached a permanent settlement with VPR Brands LP in a US court, ending a three-year dispute over the "ELF" trademark.

 

Reconciliation covers major markets such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the European Union

 

ELFBAR stated that the latest announcement signifies that all disputes globally involving the "ELF" trademark with VPR have been resolved. According to the settlement agreement, the scope covers nearly all major global markets, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the European Union.

 

According to the agreement, VPR will withdraw all trademark lawsuits and objections against ELFBAR related to the "ELF" trademark, no longer assert any related rights, cease production and marketing of any e-cigarette products bearing the "ELF" trademark, and abandon all claims to trademark rights in the "ELF" category determined by both parties.

 

ELFBAR has confirmed its global rights to the ELF series trademark

 

ELFBAR has confirmed that it now holds full rights to the ELF series trademarks in major global markets, including but not limited to ELFBAR, ELFX, ELFA, and ELFLIQ.

 

The company spokesperson stated that this settlement further solidifies their complete and legitimate claim to the "ELF" trademark, and also helps to maintain their global trademark portfolio and brand strategy.

 

ELFBAR also mentioned that during the period from 2020 to 2024, multiple favorable court judgments and intellectual property rulings in mainland China have strengthened its legal rights to the "ELF" trademark in this dispute.

 

VPR Square received a settlement of $3.2 million

 

According to the notice submitted by VPR, VPR Brands signed a litigation settlement agreement on January 30, 2026, to resolve all disputes and lawsuits related to its ELF trademark and U.S. Patent No. 8,205,622 for e-cigarettes.

 

According to the agreement, parties involved in ELFBAR will pay a total of $5.25 million, with VPR receiving $3.2 million after deducting legal fees.

 

VPR has agreed to irrevocably transfer its U.S. Patent No. 5,486,616 for the ELF trademark and all related trademarks and applications in exchange for a global, fully paid, irrevocable, non-exclusive, permanent license to Defendant's '622 patent.

 

After the agreement takes effect, VPR can sell existing inventory of ELF brand products within 75 days, but they are not allowed to produce new ELF brand products. Additionally, VPR has agreed to withdraw all trademark disputes related to the ELF brand and abandon certain trademark applications in the United States, European Union, United Kingdom, and Canada.

 

According to a report by 2Firsts, in December 2025, VPR Brands and ELFBAR submitted a joint notice to the federal court in Florida, stating that they have signed a list of settlement terms and plan to complete a global settlement covering multiple lawsuits within 30 days.

 

The dispute over the "Elf" trademark began in 2022 and has since involved injunctions, counterclaims, and key developments such as the reversal of a ruling by the federal appeals court.

 

Reviewing the three-year legal tug-of-war over the "ELF" trademark

 

The global legal battle over the "ELF" trademark has spanned three full years, evolving from intense confrontation to a financial settlement. The following are the key turning points in this dispute:

 

  • October 2022: Lawsuit Initiated - VPR Brands officially filed a lawsuit against the parent company of ELFBAR in the federal court of Florida, alleging trademark infringement and related patents, marking the beginning of legal proceedings. 
  • February 2023: Key Injunction - A judge approved a preliminary injunction against ELFBAR. In order to continue operating in the American market, ELFBAR was forced to undergo a major rebranding, changing its name to "EB DESIGN," sparking widespread attention in the e-cigarette industry. 
  • 2023 to 2025: Legal Battle - Both parties entered into a lengthy legal standoff, involving multiple rounds of appeals, counterclaims, and complex debates regarding "fair use defense." Rulings from Chinese courts gradually reinforced ELFBAR's legitimate claim to the trademark. 
  • January 2026: Settlement Agreement - The two parties reached a settlement agreement, signing a total of $5.25 million for the lawsuit resolution, with VPR agreeing to transfer ownership of the related trademarks. 
  • March 2026: Global Confirmation - ELFBAR officially announced the complete resolution of the dispute, confirming its full legal rights to the "ELF" series trademarks in major global markets including the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union. 

 

Image source: 2Firsts

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
JT Plans ¥800 Billion Investment in Heated Tobacco Over Three Years, Betting on Ploom as Second Growth Engine
JT Plans ¥800 Billion Investment in Heated Tobacco Over Three Years, Betting on Ploom as Second Growth Engine
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) CEO Takehiko Tsutsui said the company plans to invest about ¥800 billion (approximately US$5.4 billion) in heated tobacco products over three years through 2028, aiming to establish Ploom as a second growth engine after combustible cigarettes. Tsutsui said Ploom AURA helped JT increase its share of Japan’s heated tobacco market to 15.8% in the first quarter of 2026. Ploom products are now available in 29 markets, with Ploom AURA sold in 25 markets including Japan. JT also plans to continue its cigarette business while positioning its food operations, particularly frozen noodle products in North America, as another growth opportunity.
Jul.23
French Vape Market Under Pressure as Europe’s First Listed Vape Company Kumulus Vape Reports 7.8% H1 Revenue Decline, Retail Sales Rise 41.5%
French Vape Market Under Pressure as Europe’s First Listed Vape Company Kumulus Vape Reports 7.8% H1 Revenue Decline, Retail Sales Rise 41.5%
Kumulus Vape, Europe’s first publicly listed vape company, reported a 7.8% year-on-year decline in first-half 2026 revenue. Amid changing conditions in France’s vape market, the company said channel diversification helped offset pressure, with physical store sales increasing 41.5% year on year. Listed on Euronext Access Paris in 2019 and later transferred to Euronext Growth Paris, Kumulus Vape is viewed as a representative company of Europe’s vape sector. Its performance highlights the industry’s shift from rapid expansion toward more operationally focused growth.
Jul.27
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
Malaysia’s Vape Rules Face Review as Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad Addresses Dropped Nicotine Appeal
According to Free Malaysia Today on August 26, 2026, Malaysia’s Health Minister Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Health Ministry would explain the government’s decision to withdraw its appeal against a High Court ruling involving the exemption of liquid nicotine used in vape products from the Poisons List. The High Court previously ruled that the exemption decision was irrational. Dzulkefly said withdrawing the appeal did not mean the government would stop regulating vaping, and that future regulatory approaches would continue under existing legal frameworks.
Aug.28
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Special Report | Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Launch Fresh Push to Rein in Vaping
Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are tightening vape regulation through different tools, from Ukraine’s stronger enforcement push and Belarus’s proposed advertising restrictions to Russia’s new GOST standard and regional sales-ban mechanism. As black-market concerns persist, some Russian experts argue that China’s tightly controlled but legalised model — built around licensing, traceability and taxation — may offer a more effective alternative to blanket prohibition.
Jul.15