Elliott Management Corp. Increases Stake in Swedish Match

Nov.01.2022
Elliott Management Corp. Increases Stake in Swedish Match
Elliott Management increases stake in Swedish Match prior to deadline on decision to accept Philip Morris' acquisition offer.

On October 28th, well-known investment firm Elliott Management Corp. announced its decision to increase its stake in Sweden's Match Group to over 10%. This move came just a week before the November 4th deadline for shareholders to decide whether or not to accept Philip Morris International's (PMI) acquisition offer for the Swedish company.


In May of this year, PMI offered approximately $16 billion to acquire Swedish Match. The board of directors at Swedish Match recommended that shareholders accept the offer, but some investors, including Elliott Management Corp., opposed it, stating that the offer undervalued their company.


Earlier this month, PMI increased its offer from SEK 106 per share in May to SEK 116 per share ($10.34). The board of Swedish Match recommended that shareholders accept PMI's revised offer.


According to Swedish law, PMI requires approval from 90% of its shareholders to gain full control of the company. Elliot has increased its ownership stake from 7.25% to 10.5%, meaning that if they refuse the proposal, the transaction will not be able to go through. PMI has stated that they will not increase the revised offer price any further when announcing the increased bid.


PMI has the option to lower acceptance thresholds and gain a majority stake to prevent a failed acquisition. Prior to Elliott disclosing higher ownership, CEO of Swedish Match, Lars Dahlgren, told Reuters that he believes the company can develop independently or in partnership with Philip Morris.


I believe that as an independent company, we have exciting prospects, but I see exciting opportunities for potential mergers," he said.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not fully convey the intended meaning of the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

China’s Nov. Vape Exports to U.S. Hold at $549 Million, Sustaining High After October’s $591 Million Peak
China’s Nov. Vape Exports to U.S. Hold at $549 Million, Sustaining High After October’s $591 Million Peak
China’s Nov. vape exports to the U.S. held at $549 million, following October’s $591 million record. 2025 YTD exports reached $3.72 billion, officially eclipsing 2024’s full-year total. This $1.14 billion 60-day surge signals a critical inventory overhang, heightening financial and regulatory risks for manufacturers.
Dec.22
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexico’s Senate passed a reform to the General Health Law banning the production, importation, sale, and advertising of e-cigarettes and vape products nationwide. The bill passed with 76 votes in favor, 37 against, and one abstention.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore Health Minister Ong Ye Kung receives SEATCA award for tobacco control and anti-vaping push
Singapore Health Minister Ong Ye Kung receives SEATCA award for tobacco control and anti-vaping push
SEATCA has honoured Singapore Health Minister Ong Ye Kung with its inaugural Trailblazer Award, citing Singapore’s long-standing vaping ban, stepped-up enforcement and regulatory measures, and the city-state’s role in sharing tobacco-control policy experience across ASEAN.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
South Korean Court Strikes Down Health Levy on Vape Nicotine Liquids, Citing Disproportionate Penalties
A Seoul court has annulled South Korea’s health-levy assessments imposed on multiple importers of nicotine liquids used for vaping. While the court agreed the nicotine could be treated as “tobacco” because it was found to be leaf-derived, it ruled the levy—stacked with other taxes and calculated on a blunt, volume-only basis—was so severe it effectively deprived businesses of the ability to operate, breaching constitutional proportionality and equality standards.
Jan.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
China officially cancels e-cigarette export tax rebate, putting manufacturing under cost and risk pressure.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai